Mail Archive Search: <+from:k1vu@tmlp.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k1vu@tmlp.com: 69 ]

Total 69 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Zone Map for CT10.04.001 Windows (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:54:32 -0400; I operated the CQ WW SSB test this last weekend using CT 10.04.001. I used ALT-Z to bring up the Zone Map, which worked. However, the actual zone I worked never showed on the map. I never had a probl; /archives//html/CT-User/2009-10/msg00023.html (7,293 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Is ALT-F broken for CT-WIN 10.04.001 ? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:34:39 -0400; This problem exits on any contest log I create with CT-WIN 10.04.001 I just created a "Dummy June VHF LOG" and another for CQ WPX. When I tried to edit the time with ALT-F, it bumped the time ahead a; /archives//html/CT-User/2009-03/msg00007.html (7,903 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Is ALT-F broken for CT-WIN 10.04.001 ? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:36:27 -0400; During the ARRL DX SSB contest last weekend I had to edit the QOS times using "ALT-F" on the first few Q's that I had entered by hand. The Q's entered before the "DST changeover" were +5 hours from t; /archives//html/CT-User/2009-03/msg00001.html (7,487 bytes)
4. Re: [ct-user] CT-time ver 10? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:37:40 -0500; Hi Hank: I had the same problem when they changed the dates for Daylight Savings Time. I thought that the files for CT9 & CT10 (DOS) had been straightened out, but I guess not. I suggest that you go; /archives//html/CT-User/2008-11/msg00007.html (8,241 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Thru Put Time for Contesting.com Lists ??? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:01:44 -0400; I've been having problems getting messages thru to the "cq-contesting.com" list !!! Thought I would try some of the other lists that I belong to on contesting.com to check the thru put times. It seem; /archives//html/CT-User/2008-07/msg00007.html (6,877 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Thanks - CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:32:23 -0400; Thanks To: Ed, Jim, Bob, and ALL others on the list for the help with my EST/DST change over problem for CT DOS. After being reminded about the existence of the "DOS SET TZ" variable I reset it in my; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-04/msg00006.html (11,229 bytes)
7. [ct-user] CT_TIME Utility ??? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:29:13 -0400; Hi: After using CT DOS V10 for the CQ WPX contest I found all of my times were off by +1 Hour due to the new EST/DST dates. I'm trying to correct my log before the submission deadline. I tried runnin; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-04/msg00005.html (7,860 bytes)
8. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:34:16 -0400; Hi John: No, I'm using WinME. I've been running every of CT DOS under it with out problems. I don't know what to expect from CT DOS when I'm forced to use WinXP or Vista. TNX es 73 Bob, K1VU ________; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00056.html (8,993 bytes)
9. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:37:02 -0400; Very interesting for the "Dark Ages" of the DOS OP System !!! After doing a little research, "DOS TIME" was based on GMT only, thus the need to include the Time Variable "SET TZ= EST?EDT" (or whateve; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00054.html (11,409 bytes)
10. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:39:58 -0400; Hi Ed: Thank you for getting things back on track. I guess that there must be a reason for the name of "Bullhead City" !!! My intent of my original massage was to alert the CT DOS users of a possible; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00048.html (16,132 bytes)
11. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:38:51 -0400; Hi Ed: Thank you for getting things back on track. I guess that there must be a reason for the name of "Bullhead City" !!! My intent of my original massage was to alert the CT DOS users of a possible; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00047.html (16,401 bytes)
12. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:33:39 -0400; MAL: First, I didn't call you any names, I just didn't agree that your solution was acceptable for todays applications (or yesterdays) !!! I don't know why you have a bone to pick with Hans, his opin; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00046.html (20,112 bytes)
13. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:21:06 -0400; Setting your clock to GMT is like using "Rubber Gloves for Leaky Fountain Pens"!!! Every program I have (20 year old DOS programs included) has provisions for compensating for the "TIME ZONE" offset; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00039.html (10,091 bytes)
14. [ct-user] CT_TIME instructions (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:11:56 -0400; Hi: After using CT DOS for the CQ WPX contest I found all of my times were off by +1 Hour. ie: First QSO was at 00:33Z, but was logged as 01:33Z. I downloaded the latest version of CT_TIME for CT 10; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00037.html (6,865 bytes)
15. [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:48:02 -0400; Hi: After using CT DOS V10 for the CQ WPX contest I found all of my times were off by +1 Hour. ie: My first QSO was at 00:33Z, but was logged as 01:33Z. While had patched my computer for the new DST; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00036.html (6,637 bytes)
16. Re: [ct-user] SUPER PARTIAL (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:34:25 -0500; Hi Jim: I'm still using CT DOS and I can use either Shift-F8 or F12 to bring up the Check Partial Window. Is this a change in CT WIN operation vs CT DOS ??? If I had CT WIN installed I'd just test ou; /archives//html/CT-User/2007-01/msg00007.html (8,151 bytes)
17. Re: [ct-user] NEQP & 7PQ Anomalies (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:24:29 -0400; Hi Ed: TNX for answering question #1. Any comment on questions #2 and #3 ??? Again, Anything I missed ??? TNX Bob, K1VU _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@co; /archives//html/CT-User/2006-05/msg00022.html (8,094 bytes)
18. [ct-user] NEQP & 7PQ Anomalies (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:13:24 -0400; Hi: Before I send Ken a bug report I wanted to check to see if anyone else noticed these problems. I'm using CT 10.02.008 (DOS) 1-In NEQP using the "W1 Side" CT would only accept 4 characters instead; /archives//html/CT-User/2006-05/msg00020.html (7,210 bytes)
19. Re: [ct-user] New version of CT to ADIF coming - comments? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 18:50:29 -0400; Hi Jim: Are you talking about the "Contest ID" in the header or putting a "Contest ID" in each record ? If none of these changes effect the Header as currently written and we can still simply use "C2; /archives//html/CT-User/2006-05/msg00010.html (10,059 bytes)
20. Re: [ct-user] ADIF CONTEST_ID field - what to do? (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:16:19 -0500; Jim: This sounds FB to me. I would prefer to not to have any <CONTEST_ID> embedded in record. So your example #1 would fit my needs, just use C2A in the usual manner. Like "C2A 10M05.BIN" or "C2A RAC; /archives//html/CT-User/2005-12/msg00036.html (10,513 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]