Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k2kir@telenet.net: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Hippisley, K2KIR" <k2kir@telenet.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:39:38 -0500
Nahhh. There is a semi-inexhaustible supply of SSB stations waiting in the wings to get on the air the minute the perceived QRM level lessens. Nahhh again. No relief from congestion will occur. The b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00294.html (10,834 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL Contest Participation Statistics (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Hippisley, K2KIR" <k2kir@telenet.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:21:28 -0500
I found two quotes from the article to be of interest: "Sweepstakes logs for both modes were off in 2003 by 6.4 percent." "Henderson blamed sagging propagation for at least some of the drop-off in lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00358.html (9,140 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: N6AA Golf Analogy (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Hippisley, K2KIR" <k2kir@telenet.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:11:26 -0500
N6AA's golf analogy reminds me to ask: N6TJ's unflagging stamina notwithstanding, why doesn't anyone ever propose a "Seniors" category? My thoughts: 1. Keep it at 48 hours. 48 hours makes great sense
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00308.html (10,728 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] NAQP - it IS a serious contest (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley, K2KIR)
Date: Mon Jan 13 19:06:58 2003
Just think how much more fun it would be if it TRULY replaced the CD Parties by using ARRL sections as multipliers.... Bud, K2KIR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00124.html (7,676 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] RE: NAQP name handicap experiment (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley, K2KIR)
Date: Thu Jan 16 09:58:43 2003
That's because you didn't use the right phonetics. If you had said "Aaron, as in Elvis Aaron Presley", no one would have needed any repeats....:-) Bud, K2KIR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00191.html (7,362 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Re: NAQP - it IS a serious contest (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley, K2KIR)
Date: Fri Jan 17 12:55:20 2003
Thanks to all who responded, both on and off the reflector, about my suggestion to use ARRL sections in the NAQP -- and especially to Dave, K8CC, who took the time to provide background on some of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00211.html (13,144 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley, K2KIR)
Date: Wed Apr 2 08:54:54 2003
Holy mackerel !!! I cod hardly believe it. At first I thought my e-mail program was all scrod up. Seemed like a-balone to me. Oh well, W7WHY did say he smelt something.... Bud, K2KIR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00046.html (6,887 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re: good headphones for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Hippisley, K2KIR" <k2kir@telenet.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:28:11 -0500
I love my Beyer Dynamic DT-770 headphones, but they were relatively expensive. They have no microphone attached. They are high fidelity, and low impedance -- 8 ohms, I think. I prefer these to my Hei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00396.html (9,284 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] New Blood in Contesting (can one go homeagain?) (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Fri Mar 17 01:35:49 2000
I'd like to see some comments posted == ! llege) I could only get on long enough to make two or three contacts and sometimes I took first place, but I was always in them, going after my own personal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00236.html (9,438 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] New Blood in Contesting (can one go homeagain?) (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Fri Mar 17 01:35:49 2000
I'd like to see some comments posted == ! llege) I could only get on long enough to make two or three contacts and sometimes I took first place, but I was always in them, going after my own personal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00237.html (9,451 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Comments on ARRL DX Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Thu Feb 18 20:09:56 1999
Yep -- it's meant "Go Ahead" ever since I got my Novice license in 1954... Bud, K2KIR -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-02/msg00007.html (7,095 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Comments on ARRL DX Contest Exchange (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Thu Feb 18 20:09:56 1999
Yep -- it's meant "Go Ahead" ever since I got my Novice license in 1954... Bud, K2KIR -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-02/msg00042.html (7,081 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Re: Choice of CW Narrow filters (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Fri Apr 16 17:18:48 1999
Well, there's a name for this effect, which has been documented previously in other fields. In my advanced years I can't remember it, though. The essence, as I recall, is that the "right" amount of b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00146.html (10,471 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Re: Choice of CW Narrow filters (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Sat Apr 17 14:29:46 1999
Yep, that's it!!! (I thought of it about six hours after posting my original message, when I was nowhere near an e-mail connection. Thanks for the assist. Bud, K2KIR -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00152.html (11,892 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Mon Jan 12 10:35:14 1998
Yes, and let's use ARRL/RAC sections instead of states. Bud, K2KIR <snip> -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00201.html (6,616 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] The best computer-control (and implementingit in the TS-930!) (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Tue Nov 10 14:52:00 1998
Certainly not the TS-940. Its response to computer polling screws up the transmitted frequency whenever RIT or XIT (but not both) is active and is set at a non-zero frequency differential relative to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00136.html (7,669 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Ts940 problems? (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley)
Date: Tue Nov 10 15:01:55 1998
Yep -- the TS-940 computer interface isn't smart enough to keep PC software polling of its frequencies from messing up the frequency of your transmitted signal if you have either RIT or XIT (but not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00138.html (8,211 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Re: QST Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: k2kir@telenet.net (Bud Hippisley, K2KIR)
Date: Thu Jul 25 13:38:00 2002
I don't agree -- when I was a new ham, I used to read the line scores for my section to see if I knew any of the contesters who participated -- even though I hadn't yet decided that I wanted to be a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00422.html (11,312 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu