Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k2owr@comcast.net: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Half sloper recommedations needed (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:15:39 -0500
tell us............ ......How well does it work? Tell us the kind of stuff you can work on the air. BILL K2OWR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00062.html (14,214 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:17:29 -0500
the guys dangling from it, then connect them. up with guys dangling, actually intended for the section after that and the whole process is repeated, guying every 30', but never climbing more than on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00104.html (8,921 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 18:55:52 -0500
later. It was not damaged seriously. It was dumb how it happened. I was down to the last 4 sections, where the first set of guys were, and in a fit of sheer "stupid" it seemed like a good idea, as l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00108.html (11,602 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Tiltover ideas? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:27:05 -0500
what method you use, but can I be your life insurance beneficiary? :-) BILL K2OWR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00148.html (8,574 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Re Henry 2KD2 Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:14:57 -0500
For me, I can't imagine 160 without using one. BILL K2OWR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00158.html (9,502 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex REMOTE control (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:39:56 -0500
some reason the limit switches fail you wind up with a backyard full of mangled tower sections, and perhaps a hole in your house. I know some people do it, but if you do, always have the tower in vi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00178.html (8,027 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex REMOTE control (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:30:37 -0500
left them up unless I was on the air. Another reason not to "remote" the tower operation is the fact that you cannot really see if any cables, like the coax, hang up or get caught. Another is the to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00181.html (8,479 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex REMOTE control (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:52:37 -0500
In the word's of the comic Victor Borge, you are searching for "the cure for which there is no disease" BILL _______________________________________________ _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00186.html (8,051 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] mailing list etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:03:45 -0500
While this configuration cuts down on mail to the entire list, it severely limits further discussion on a topic and in effect cuts the thread short. I too take the time to edit out the address. It w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00199.html (8,569 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] mailing list etiquette (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:04:16 -0500
I did warn you Marlon. :-( BILL -- Original Message -- From: "John Kemker" <john@kemker.org> To: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, January 11
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00204.html (11,732 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] broken balun wires (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:14:17 -0500
I would crimp it AND solder it. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00287.html (8,843 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Guy article in CQ (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:20:26 -0500
I never knew any of this stuff about guys. It must be a miracle that the dozen or so guyed towers that I've put up, over the fifty years I've been a ham, have not come crashing down, especially cons
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00305.html (12,818 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Guy article in CQ (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:52:12 -0500
amount of information being given on this topic. I am quite serious though about my really never overthinking this that much. My tower installations have been under 100', except for one, and all I e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00318.html (11,216 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Guywires (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:22:56 -0500
Here comes round two..... Bases. I can't wait to learn what I should have been doing with those all these years And from quite a few people who have never even actually put up a tower :-) BILL _____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00329.html (11,362 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] coax entry (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:41:38 -0500
this topic, but frankly the 3"PVC is the way to go. I have done it that way in several houses. After it's in there stuff a rag in it from the inside and yank it out whenever you need to remove or ad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00432.html (8,911 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] Fw: [Amps] condition 4-1000A tubes? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:09:23 -0500
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00518.html (8,387 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] serious noise problem (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:40:51 -0500
reflectors these days, but>>>>>> Do you have any "Touch" light controllers in that area? It took me awhile to find that problem in my house once. It is also possible for an incandescent bulb to radi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00780.html (9,101 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Deluxe climbing harness/fall arrest for sale (score: 1)
Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:04:50 -0500
can't handle the flaming so I won't :-) BILL K2OWR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00888.html (8,511 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] separating older tubular tower sections ? (score: 1)
Author: William Radice <k2owr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:56:31 -0400
jack...go slow and be careful.. Never heard of welds being there. BILL OWR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00217.html (8,221 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu