Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k2xx@swva.net: 268 ]

Total 268 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TowerTalk] rotor question (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:45:05 -0400
Greg, thread locking adhesive, such as Loctite or Permabond types, is essential here. Otherwise I suffer the same bolt loosening problems as you have. 73, Joe K2XX ___________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00404.html (9,483 bytes)

202. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM III x HAM IV and others (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:32:13 -0400
I have stayed out of this discussion because things mechanical are not my strong suit, and I have had my share of rotor problems lately. At any rate, several months ago I had a discussion with Craig,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00124.html (11,387 bytes)

203. Re: [TowerTalk] Positioning A LM-70 Crank-Up (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:31:32 -0400
I have done it with a forklift truck, the boom and crane from a brick delivery truck and the crane from a rigger's truck. (It probably can also be done with a conventional tow truck, but I've never t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00144.html (8,511 bytes)

204. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Cable bulkhead pass through (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:36:14 -0400
I use 8-pin Jones plugs and sockets (Chassis mount) for my rotor cables. The cables are hard wired to the sockets on the outside of the shack interface panel. 73, Joe K2XX ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00272.html (7,399 bytes)

205. Re: [TowerTalk] positive pull down for Tri-ex towers (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:59:35 -0400
That is absolutely right about the top section hanging up when trying to lower the tower in a strong wind. The wind tilts it so that it will not fall freely until the wind lets up. If you had been cr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00256.html (11,126 bytes)

206. [TowerTalk] WTB: 40M Quad Spreaders (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:35:05 -0400
If anyone out there has some 40M quad spreaders in good condition that they're willing to part with, I'd be interested in buying one or more. I prefer Cubex, but any manufacturer will do. Please let
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00549.html (7,157 bytes)

207. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax standoffs (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:51:45 -0500
While I haven't dealt with Tashjian in about three years, the communication lapses and delays reported here are about the same as I experienced. It is my distinct impression that Tashjian Towers is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00465.html (9,415 bytes)

208. Re: [TowerTalk] Quad questions, long(ish) (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:19:28 -0500
Martin, I can comment on your plan to use relays to short out the inactive drivers. It adds unnecessary complications. I do agree that it is essential to short the inactive driver elements, but that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00024.html (13,513 bytes)

209. Re: [TowerTalk] LM-470 and a T2X Rotor (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:49:49 -0500
Bill, I had problems fitting the T2X inside my LM-470s. However, I was advised by Skip, AJ6Y, who routinely installs tower systems, to place 1-2" spacers under the rotor plate. The spacers are made f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00052.html (8,912 bytes)

210. Re: [TowerTalk] LM-470 at 100 MPH (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:23:48 -0500
That scenario is consistent with the failure that I experienced several years ago. We were visited by a sudden mini-tornado, and I'd guesstimate that the wind peaked at around 100 mph. Tower was supp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00584.html (11,472 bytes)

211. [TowerTalk] Titanex Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:34:00 -0500
Does anyone know if Titanex has a US distributor? I wrote their German office asking for that information but received no reply. 73, Joe K2XX _______________________________________________ _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00205.html (6,687 bytes)

212. Re: [TowerTalk] Betr.: Topband: Titanex Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:28:38 -0500
Thanks for the info, Andi. I've copied the TT list on this reply because several others suspected that Titanex might be out of business. 73 es 55, Joe _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00261.html (7,926 bytes)

213. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Antenna Suggestions Wanted (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:40:42 -0500
I'd install either a 110' or 135' doublet fed with balanced feedline. In the latter case, you could let the extra wire droop in equal lengths from each end, but the difference in performance with the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00052.html (8,356 bytes)

214. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Antenna Suggestions Wanted (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:08:08 -0500
Actually, I was going to mention the EDZ when making my suggestion. Adding (drooping) three extra feet to each end to make 116' is 30M EDZ and a true half wave dipole on 75M. I have successfully used
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00090.html (10,125 bytes)

215. Re: [TowerTalk] Parts fo A HAM II (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:36:07 -0400
The original Ham IIs had aluminum ring gears. You should replace it with a steel gear and an improved heavy duty brake. Both are available from C.A.T.S. I have been told by Craig of CATS that it'll t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00266.html (8,090 bytes)

216. [TowerTalk] Balanced Feedline for Ground Mounted Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:00:34 -0400
If one had to install a ground mounted vertical as far as 2,000 feet from the shack and wanted to avoid the expense of using low loss coax, could a balanced feedline be used as an alternative? The id
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00409.html (8,000 bytes)

217. Re: [TowerTalk] Balanced Feedline for Ground Mounted Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 10:56:01 -0400
Rick, Jerry, Dave, Jan, Jim L. and Jim B.; many thanks for your informative replies. Jan, I will dig up that copy of HR and check the article by N4UH. First of all, I acknowledge that 2,000 feet of l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00436.html (14,982 bytes)

218. [TowerTalk] 1/2" Commscope 50 ohm hardline (SFX-500) (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:48:40 -0400
Anyone have experience with this hardline? Its attenuation at 150 MHz is 1.2 dB vs about 0.9 db for LDF4-50a and 1.5 for LMR-400. There are no data available for frequencies below 150 MHz. 73, Joe K2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00185.html (6,816 bytes)

219. Re: [TowerTalk] DAVIS RF response: Alternatives & Comscope SFX-500 data vs. LMR & LDF4 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:14:48 -0400
Steve, many thanks for your reply regarding the Commscope SFX-500. Yours was the only reply that I received, and I have to conclude that Commscope is a new player in the coax game and that there is n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00202.html (16,255 bytes)

220. Re: [TowerTalk] DAVIS RF response: Alternatives & Comscope SFX-500 data vs. LMR & LDF4 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:17:08 -0400
So I have now learned from several respondents. 73 and TNX to all, Joe K2XX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00213.html (10,144 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu