Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3bz@arrl.net: 292 ]

Total 292 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Tower base hole? (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:21:59 -0400
Let's see if I understand correctly: You're getting down in a 4 foot square hole... that's 7 feet deep, 15" over your head... in dirt soft enough to dig by hand in 4 hours, and you're going to underc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00222.html (10,395 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] Short Booms (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:38:19 -0400
The 3 element SteppIR has only a 16 foot boom, yet has achieved a strong following of users who think it's the best thing since the yagi was invented. I can't do the math, but it would seem that tune
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00306.html (8,801 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] using trees to anchor end(s) of wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:30:24 -0400
Tim... over here, we mostly call them "lag bolts" or "lag screws". An arborist friend told me use of lag bolts is, as you point out, much kinder to the tree. The tree heals right around them with no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00336.html (9,761 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] using trees as tower guypoints (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:24:11 -0400
Ted... thanks for the comments, especially about going all the way through the trunk with the anchor bolts (I think that's what you said). According to my friend the arborist, the tree will heal righ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00343.html (9,532 bytes)

105. [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:09:24 -0400
Do I understand correctly....that the thrust bearing (a) takes the weight off the rotor, and (b) allows removal of the rotor while leaving the mast and antennas in place? Any other purpose(s)? I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00397.html (7,276 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] Thrust Bearing Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:30:19 -0400
My thrust bearing has only two setscrews... at 90 deg to each other. That's what led me to think that the thrust bearing is a weight-carrying device, to take vertical load off the rotator. Many have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00415.html (11,410 bytes)

107. [TowerTalk] Cadweld, Ultraweld, etc (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:07:48 -0400
My ground system presently uses clamps, but I want to improve it. After checking the erico and harger websites, I'm not clear on what I need to weld my ground wire to the ground rods. I have several
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00572.html (8,176 bytes)

108. [TowerTalk] Ground Connection to Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:29:43 -0400
What is the best way to attach ground wires to aluminum tower legs? Would a brass ground-rod-type clamp be good? Or a copper lug under one of the leg bolts? Jerry K3BZ _______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00003.html (7,078 bytes)

109. [TowerTalk] SPG Panel Box (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:33:37 -0400
Can anyone direct me to magazine or book articles, or other sources of plans for building a basic Single-Point-Ground panel box for mounting outside at my point-of-entry? Jerry K3BZ _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00004.html (6,628 bytes)

110. Re: [TowerTalk] SPG Panel Box (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:28:12 -0400
For the first time, I didn't get many replies to an inquiry on TowerTalk. Being a ham-with-no-design-talents, I was looking for a construction article or some DIY plans for a Single Point Ground "box
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00033.html (9,738 bytes)

111. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:31:30 -0400
Dan... you are not alone... earlier this summer I had nearly the identical situation happen here. The hole turned out much bigger, the concrete truck sank in soft clay AND got stuck between two trees
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00054.html (10,914 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:48:50 -0400
I checked on the cost of a pumper...I was quoted a minimum of $600 here in eastern PA... and that was too much for me. I am SO glad that I then asked the concrete supplier to send someone to inspect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00058.html (11,021 bytes)

113. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 13:11:55 -0400
After much reading here on TowerTalk, my conclusions were that forms have to be removed after the pour and then the space has to be backfilled... with compression every foot or so. That would be more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00060.html (9,924 bytes)

114. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:40:10 -0400
There are 27 cu ft in 1 cu yd (3 ft x 3 ft x 3 ft)...so 2.5 ft x 2.5 ft x 5.0 ft = 31.25 cu ft... divided by 27 cu ft = 1.157 cu yd. Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: Jim Rhodes To: gdaught6@st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00071.html (9,743 bytes)

115. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:21:45 -0400
You may be right for a cylinder....but he said 2.5 x 2.5 x 5.... that's not a cylinder. Still, the calcs (1.157 vs 1.25) are not that much different. :-) Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: FireB
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00078.html (12,403 bytes)

116. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:38:25 -0400
Yeah, well... no worries...maybe this thread has just about exhausted itself anyway :-) Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: FireBrick To: Jerry Keller ; gdaught6@stanford.edu ; towertalk@contesti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00081.html (13,980 bytes)

117. Re: [TowerTalk] How do you cut this stuff? (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 23:02:17 -0400
If you want to see the most creative use of one of those grinders, check out www.grindergirl.com or watch the Letterman show on Thurs or Fri nites. Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: Jim White,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00084.html (11,786 bytes)

118. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:20:57 -0400
OK, maybe my ignorance is showing, but does anyone else think it a bit preposterous for an engineer to recommend digging a 25 foot deep hole for a tower base? If the soil content would allow augering
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00092.html (12,076 bytes)

119. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:41:58 -0400
K1TTT: "....where is this that you can drill that deep and not hit ground water??" Not to mention magma..... I would hate to do the rebar for it. A 25' long rebar cage that has to be positioned in th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00094.html (14,449 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] The tower base is poured BUT... (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 17:19:46 -0400
My conclusion that my backhoe operator used too big a bucket was HIS explanation for why the hole came out too big. He expected pretty much what he found under the surface here, but he said (in hinds
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00101.html (9,704 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu