Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3ft@erols.com: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Aren't M/Ms annoying? (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:55:05 -0500
You know... there is NOTHING that prevents you from trying to hog the bandedges all weekend IF you want to do so. I'm NOT saying you won't have a horserace on yourhands.. but you can try! Plus look a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00339.html (10,287 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] Is 'YOU' REALLY 'you' or is it 'YOU'??? (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 14:48:17 -0500
Since the SS also allows non-human categories (class S, etc) then it would seem that 'YOU' can be referring to the STATION, in the case of the schools. Either way... does it REALLY matter at all what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00115.html (8,864 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] Out of band during SS and other violations (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:27:45 -0500
The mails will begin delivering POPKIN-GRAMS! I would bet that Dave had to buy a new rubber stamp for these two SweepStakes! K3FT -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00226.html (8,463 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] Comments from VY1JA - NT (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:48:44 -0500
Greetings fellow seekers of the 'Clean Sweep' VY1JA sent me the following. with only 233 Q's it looks like ARRL may be forced to offer a mug that says 'I ALMOST got a clean-sweep in the 2003 SS!' Big
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00233.html (10,316 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] POPKIN GRAMS (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:35:57 -0500
Replace 'WAS' with 'IS' and you shall be correct. Dave Popkin is still around and his (in)famous 'Popkin Grams' are not only legend BUT true, to this day. When I worked for the FCC, in the Enforcemen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00242.html (9,558 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] Number, Check, etc (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:53:21 -0500
What I found, after almost 1500 Q's at N3OC where I opped SSB SS was that the most effective method was to transmit MY exchange with a measured cadence, slow and measured, with pauses in a couple spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00302.html (10,599 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] SS Question - THE intangible 'WHY' (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 08:00:49 -0500
In any radio competition there are BUILT IN advantages based on laws of physical location, electromagnetic propagation and YES.. MR.MURPHY! (And if you DON'T think Murphy's Law is real... you haven't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00368.html (10,066 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] N3OC's observations and paying your dues... (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:13:58 -0500
Richard notes, in a paragraph, within his response one VERY COGENT point that ANY and ALL ops who have become KNOWN as good ops can (and do) verify. Rich said "At least to some extent it's my previou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00414.html (10,761 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] Non-rare spots during contest (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 22:31:39 -0500
Spot ALL the DX -- rare or not. Why? because ALL DX counts for points AND QSO's! Sure, KP4, G, UR, and PY are not 'rare'.. but they ARE points and QSO's and trust me.. When you've managed to 'wring a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00069.html (8,524 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] George Orwell would be proud!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:20:55 -0500
To see his projections described in '1984' coming to pass - just a few years late. I have deleted the references to who posted what, because I'm not interested in pointing comments at a PERSON.. just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00174.html (12,337 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:47:16 -0500
A 6m Contest that Mark talks about would be one that Larson E. Rapp W1OU would be most pleased to be a part of! (if you recall who THAT is.. you are as old - or older - than I am) 73 K3FT -- The worl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00348.html (8,310 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:08:57 -0500
I am a little uncomfortable with talk of intentionally QRMing an ongoing communication even if it is unlicensed. , I don't think it is proper to intentionally or systematically QRM them. We are a cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00405.html (11,180 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] 10M (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:37:40 -0500
I am involved with logging and submitting reports on the 10M band invaders with 4-5 other hams Have also been participating with ARRL and FCC as well. If you are interested in being involved in this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00421.html (7,668 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] RE: Cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (k3ft@erols.com)
Date: Tue May 27 10:06:29 1997
...<snip> de k3ft Pete makes a very cogent point.. When I worked commercial marine (ship and shoreside) MF/HF CW we used cut numbers quite freqently in messages dealing with (mostly) numerical data s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00234.html (9,985 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] 'bogus' check (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT)
Date: Sat Apr 27 10:15:29 2002
Have to laugh at what some guy might think as he copies my check of '03' (for the 2002 SS) which, when, after about 15 hours my Q number is up there as being quite good for a 99 year old contester! H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00429.html (7,723 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] SoBS/SoBC (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT)
Date: Sat Apr 27 13:38:39 2002
So BC! So BS! Great idea! How about just 'BC' and 'BS' ;-) Personally, I don't care WHAT check or section you send as long as you are consistent and that's what you submit under IF you choose to send
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00433.html (6,378 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] seeking source for US County to US city lookup/vice versa (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT)
Date: Thu May 9 20:01:48 2002
Need an application OR an Internet site that will let me enter either a US City and get the appropriate US County or vice versa. This isn't specifically a contest question, but I DO use it for contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00089.html (7,639 bytes)

58. [CQ-Contest] US County-city lookup info (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT)
Date: Fri May 10 09:13:00 2002
The gang (as usual!) came through! The one I found that met my needs was referred from K1PX (TNX!) http://www.naco.org/counties/queries/city_srch.cfm This allows you to enter a County name OR a city
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00094.html (6,887 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] Italian Kilowatts (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT)
Date: Sun May 19 19:20:04 2002
Ron, NOW you've done it! You went 'pasta' the line and have stirred the pot.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00206.html (6,138 bytes)

60. [CQ-Contest] borrowed callsigns (score: 1)
Author: k3ft@erols.com (Chuck K3FT)
Date: Sun Jun 9 17:50:41 2002
I know that ARRL HQ, many times, has permitted their call (W1AW) to be used at various venues. Dayton, for example, operates W1AW/8 at their site. I know this was done because I visited Dayton and sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00113.html (7,938 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu