Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3mm@verizon.net: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Memorable SS Fun-etics (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:46:47 -0500
Those are fine, but I'd have trouble controlling myself at times if my call ended in "FU" ! Ty K3MM I'll add W7 Yogi-Bear in Montana! - KI5DR - K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com> wrote: The following station F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00598.html (9,179 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP front-end diode mod (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:23:06 -0500
Ty K3MM Tony, YES, In all three of our MP's. I have no testing equipment to chart the improvement in the MP's. Running MP's side by side the mod radio clearly hears much better. Big improvment over
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00066.html (9,261 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW Propagation "spotlighting" (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:34:22 -0500
160 was very good from here as well as was 80. I worked NM on 160, but somehow missed it on 40 and couldn't get a pass back there. I think I heard XE as well, but didn't work it. I did work ZF2NT on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00295.html (10,589 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:10:05 -0500
No. All you have to do is say that all antennas must be confined to an area with a 100ft or 30 meter radius. There should also be a height limitation of , say, 70 feet max for all antennas. RX antenn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00527.html (10,635 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:20:21 -0500
No, I'm saying single element for the wires/vertical category, but also add the space limitation to eliminate bizarre things like rhombics, beverages, etc. that most people don't have the space to co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00568.html (13,069 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:29:04 -0500
Of course, we'll have the Force Radio Gestapo conduct raids on suspects stations and cut off their privates for violations! Geez! How do we enforce ANY contest rules? Who cares about loading coils? T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00570.html (12,465 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:05:55 -0500
Rules have to be measureable and enforceable and trying to specify a gain limitation would be anything but that IMHO... How would you calculate ground losses, odd configurations due to space limitati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00596.html (12,014 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cordless keyboard / mouse (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:35:09 -0500
Answer: Bluetooth! Ty K3MM These cordless devices most of the time use 27MHz as their TX/RX frequencies, so that explains why you block it out working on 28MHz. However I do not understand why it get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00664.html (10,689 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] Filed Day operations on digital??? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:58:01 -0500
I spearheaded the W3AO digital operation last year and it's actually become a significant part of our score. PSK is where it's at and the operators seem to have gotten much better about "contest mode
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00163.html (8,444 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] Filed Day operations on digital??? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:18 -0500
As long as you have enough isolation between antennas you are fine. Keep em lined up end to end and separated a bit and it should be fine. e. It is hard to envision the PSK users interfering with CW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00194.html (8,256 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Freaking me out (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:40:10 -0500
Re: RTTY on 160, there has been a lot of talk on the RTTY reflectors about 160 skeds, activity hours and the like, so that's not too surprising. Ty K3MM There's an old Dilbert cartoon in which Wally
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00263.html (8,877 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:58:57 -0500
Contest secret, Part 2: Try RTTY. You can do an entire contest without speaker or headphones, in absolute silence. XYL approved. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Uuhhhh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00638.html (8,387 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Contest and CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:12:06 -0500
Yes, as one of those dastardly RTTY contesters, we have no choice. More importantly, the DX we are trying to work has a lot less choice. For instance JA's are supposed to stay between 7025 and 7030,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00168.html (8,807 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get me the bandplan cops - RTTY on the low end of40! (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:55:33 -0500
I guess I don't count. I was around 7028 almost all last night! You CW Sprint guys are bouncing all over the band with your silly QSY rule that is designed to disrupt every net and rag chew for 50 kc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00169.html (9,575 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Circle Jerks (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:30:01 -0400
Only problem with grid squares is that they arent really square. They get smaller as you move away from the equator. Ty K3MM That still penalizes clubs where a given state is chopped into multiple se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00303.html (13,639 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Surplus FT1000MP Shipping cartons? (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:41:13 -0400
Nonsense. I used my original double-boxed styrofoam blocked container for several airline trips into the Caribbean, etc., with no ill effects. Either it wasn't double boxed and/or the shipping compan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00099.html (10,345 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band pass filters (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:48:42 -0500
Huh? How is the Dunestar "smarter" than the ICE? I've found the ICE units to be more reliable, especially less prone to abuse damage by improper impedances, ie. high voltage damage. ICE uses silver m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00373.html (9,621 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX RTTY quirk (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:57:34 -0500
If memory serves, this contest started up under the Digital Journal or perhaps even before that before it went under CQ. At any rate, back then some felt that either 30 hrs was plenty of time to work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00208.html (8,551 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart"<k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:30:54 -0500
With the long exchange, it's a big help to S&P'ers to have the call in the exchange so they can tell who's frequency it really is, make sure it wasn't a busted spot, and/or figure out if a QSO is jus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00270.html (11,863 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:42:51 -0500 (CDT)
We'll be using traditional packet and skimmer spotting networks at W3AO. A good source is the reversebeacon.net web site. You can telnet direct to them or pick one or two receiver sites close to you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00114.html (7,539 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu