Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ik@subich.com: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:27:15 -0400
"Can't hear them," "Where are they," "Why are they working xxx and not me?" comments are all a major PITA. If it is something relatively rare and folks have set alarms on their terminal software, fla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00073.html (11,682 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:00:40 -0400
Some people are "fortunate" to be able to use their shacks for other things (like "real" work) and can't be tuning the bands constantly ... or like to be able to spend time with a family and still kn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00085.html (15,069 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another view for 1-pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:20:17 -0500
Not hardly ... CQWW RTTY already includes 1 point for "own country QSOs" and multipliers for each US State/VE Province. That hardly discourages participation. In my opinion, it increases participatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00823.html (9,087 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another view for 1-pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:20:17 -0500
Bill, the solution is to adopt the CQWW RTTY scoring rules. In CQWW RTTY, "own country QSOs" are worth one point. In addition US States and VE Provinces are multipliers. Those changes would put US st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00824.html (7,903 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fixing contests (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:21:59 -0500
Dale, If you want to improve the number of participants in a contest like CQWW, the scoring system for US stations absolutely needs to be fixed. It can be completely demoralizing for a station in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00021.html (9,447 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another view for 1-pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:46:01 -0500
With soundcards and software (MixW, MMTTY, WinWarbler, etc.) that offer "Contest Modes" I will bet that participation levels in CQWW RTTY will be very close to those of CQWW CW within five years. To
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00026.html (9,510 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers etc (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:48:56 -0500
The zero point rule tends to concentrate SOAB operations in areas that do not have to deal with the zero point issue (EU, W1, W2, W3). In those places with large numbers of potential zero point Qs, y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00057.html (9,337 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: What Software to use ???? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:53:33 -0500
This problem is unique to Yaesu radios and very fast multi-processor (dual core and hyperthreding) systems due. N1MM released the latest update (5.11.12) yesterday that includes a change in polling f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00325.html (8,622 bytes)

109. [CQ-Contest] LotW Support by ARRL Officials & Officers ... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:26:03 -0500
Here is an interesting analysis of Logbook of the World participation by key ARRL officers and Directors done by AB5K. It is a sad commentary to see several well-known and active amateurs who can't e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00467.html (10,539 bytes)

110. [CQ-Contest] FW: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert - LOTW User Update (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:43:47 -0500
RTTY ops, I need to update my post on ARRL Officials that do not use the LOTW. It turns out that Central Director: George R. Isely, W9GIG does use the LOTW and is listed in the HB9BZA LOTW user list.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00480.html (11,637 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:24:51 -0500
No - a Rhombic is either a two element (stacked "V" beams) or four element (an array of 4 long wires) antenna depending on how classify it. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00522.html (9,419 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] Somewhere in the Future (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:44:43 -0500
I would hope that those who value amateur radio would seek to have much of the MF/HF allocations treated as international parks. That is they remain as a preserve, away from high data rate, automated
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00533.html (8,337 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu