Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k5qe@sabinenet.com: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] using non-amateur means for skedsduring contests (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:46:56 -0600
Hello to everyone....for me, VHF contesting is all about the CONTACTS. You can either work them or you can't. The ARRL seems to be worried about the HOW of that contact rather than the contact itself
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00281.html (11,289 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] rules (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:20:27 -0600
RRR....if we could just get the HFers out of the world of VHF, most things would work better. The VUAC made some very good changes to the VHF contest rules.....they just did not go far enough. All th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00305.html (11,337 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] rules (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:02:36 -0600
Hi George....I just spent two hours writing to another guy that was offended by my comments. I guess that I was too tart in my tone. However, on these reflectors, I can't afford the time to write two
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00310.html (15,444 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 7000 vs other HF/VHF/UHF rigs (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:54:13 -0600
Hello to all....I like the IC7000 for roving...it has several features that work nicely. 1. All my rover transverters are set up as "max of 10W on 28Mhz IF" for the input. We actually adjust them for
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00330.html (12,001 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] transverter questions (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:28:02 -0600
Hello to all.....we used the Elecraft transverters in our White Rover on 6M thru 432. They work very well and we have had no problems. We did this because DEMI is not makeing a 6M converter with 28Mh
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00026.html (13,448 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] SPLAT! (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:01:53 -0600
Hello to all....I have run a SPLAT! plot for my station, assuming 144.2Mhz and an antenna height of 440ft.....I clearly don't understand what this plot is telling me. The circular pattern that I get
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-03/msg00046.html (10,933 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting ethics for rovers (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:45:31 -0600
Hello to all....I was one of those that pushed the VUAC hard for the "Family Rule" to be specifically allowed in the rules. This because I have a father with 3 sons(ages like 9, 11, and 12) all of wh
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-03/msg00090.html (9,455 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2008 ARRL June VHF - 3830 Claimed Scores 20Jun2008 (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:41:39 -0500
WOW!!!! Maybe I need to refigure my score with this new method.......73's Marshall K5QE _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00343.html (8,487 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Limited Roving - Worth the Effort? (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:49:19 -0500
Hello to all....This reply has gotten long too, so it may fall into the LONG RANT category too....Sorry..... GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: I have been watching this thread for some time with intrest. The fir
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00087.html (23,432 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] 902.010 for contests? (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:45:11 -0500
Hello to everyone....I asked Kent, WA5VJB, how the 902 / 903 split ocurred. He told me that long ago, the East got a bunch of crystals that put them on 903, while the center of the country got a bunc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00089.html (13,446 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Coax for VHF / UHF (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:12:47 -0500
Hi Rich.....this is a serious topic and unfortunately has a lot of "IFs, ANDs, or BUTs". The most important thing to focus on is LOSS. It is LOSS that we are trying to avoid on VHF / UHF. The HF guys
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00130.html (15,613 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Coax for VHF / UHF (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:37:34 -0500
Hello again to everyone.....Mike has found THE Times Microwave Chart that I was trying to send to everyone. That second link is the one. I could not find that chart on the web anymore, so 2 AttaBoys
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00133.html (11,041 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] 2008 fall sprints (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:26:50 -0500
Hello to all.....This "new" method appears to be the "old" method of rover scoring. I think that it is what is used in the CQ WW VHF Contest. Far superior to the current ARRL method. Right now, under
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00155.html (7,979 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] FW: Apology about DEMI (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:32:28 -0600
Hello to all....a REAL man does not read the instructions!!!!! What I say about software is that if you have to read the instructions for a piece of software, it is DEFECTIVE!!! This is somewhat "ton
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00025.html (9,728 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:25:56 -0600
Hello to all.....Steve may be onto something with these proposed rules. CONCERNING RULE 1: I think that I would allow 20 contacts for both the Limited Rover and Rover classes. I see no need to limit
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00068.html (12,780 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] logs are members property (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:02:41 -0600
Hello to all.....ROGER ROGER.......It may be a waste of web space to publish all the logs, but certainly the logs of the top 10 in every cagegory should be published. Others could be published at the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00075.html (9,111 bytes)

17. [VHFcontesting] A reasonable approach to the grid circling problem.... (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:39:03 -0600
Hello to everyone.....K1IIG has posted that this is not a rover reflector and that we should stop talking about the rover rules. He is right....this is not a rover reflector, it is a VHF Contesting r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00105.html (10,282 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] K5QE Contest activities (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:57:31 -0600
Hello to everyone interested in VHF contesting..... The January VHF contest is looming in the near future. We will be operating the K5QE contest station for the entire contest(assuming that we can co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00006.html (10,016 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] Beating the East Coast monopoly stations (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 15:02:44 -0600
Hi Mike, Greg and everyone else on the reflector...... Well guys, I seem to get into QST all OK. I have yet to win an ARRL VHF contest(I have two seconds in Jan), although I have won the UHF contest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00017.html (12,596 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] A distance scoring contest (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:08:33 -0600
Hello to everyone.....Concerning the Distance scoring thing: First, let me say that I neither oppose nor favor a distance measured contest. I have never operated in one and it might be fun. However,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00150.html (13,129 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu