Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k5zd@outlook.com: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] K8CC SK (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 18:56:34 +0000
Very sorry to hear this news. Dave was editor of the National Contest Journal for several years. First while I was publisher and then when the ARRL took over the publication. He was a guy who got thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00198.html (9,406 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Feb Sprint time changes (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 00:28:43 +0000
The actual goal of moving an hour earlier is to reduce the West "advantage". In the last few years, 20m has only been open in the Eastern USA for a short time after the start. This reduces it to a tw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00010.html (19,452 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting tip of the week (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:51:48 +0000
As contesters we may feel that way, but the original point is valid. The casual guy who is chasing awards does not feel compelled to maximize QSOs. He is looking for contacts that could result in QSL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00043.html (10,048 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 04:32:07 +0000
I worked that guy. Gave me a smile. I want to know why RTTY ops always send my call when they are calling me. So many times I would hear my call print in the clear and then there was QRM from other c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00057.html (8,550 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:24:23 +0000
Nothing wrong with this default message. I believe the error is that guys send the exchange message when they are calling someone. So as the CQer, it is a bit confusing to see an exchange printing wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00068.html (13,168 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX logs and overlays (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:17:08 +0000
You may only enter one Overlay category. You must make a choice. Randy K5ZD Is it possible to enter both the classic and the TB-Wires category overlays for the RTTY WPX contest? The robot won't let m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00094.html (8,502 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] New CQ WPX Activity Map (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 02:35:48 +0000
We are always looking for new and interesting ways to present the results of the CQ WPX Contest. Thanks to the efforts of Tom Morrison, K5TM, we can now display the number of entries over the past 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00019.html (7,213 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] WPX Web site changes (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:26:57 +0000
There are several update to the CQ WPX web site due the category changes and to present historical data in new ways. Full details on the blog at https://cqwpx.com/blog/web-site-changes-for-new-catego
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-03/msg00103.html (6,796 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 10:36:37 +0000
One of the great things about contesting is that everyone gets to select their own way to play the game. They may get on for a few hours, a lot of hours, high power, QRP, single band, or maybe they j
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-04/msg00023.html (11,472 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Please Explain This... (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:47:19 +0000
Yes, this can be annoying. Especially when there are two or more callers about the same frequency and signal strength. These days, it seems there are many people working CW who don't really copy it t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-04/msg00091.html (11,468 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Wonderings (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 01:32:06 +0000
I think this page will answer your question. https://cqwpx.com/legacyrecords.htm Randy K5ZD GE All         So now that there is no distinction between assisted and unassisted         in CQ WPX CW thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-04/msg00144.html (8,782 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Wonderings (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:47:42 +0000
The change that really impacted WPX SSB/CW was when the limit for single ops went from 30 hours to 36 hours. This greatly limited the competitive opportunities around the world. Those extra 6 hours p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-05/msg00008.html (12,260 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] What is a good prefix for the WPX Contest? (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 02:13:05 +0000
One of the fun things about the WPX contest is the number of multipliers. Every new prefix worked helps build the score. Ray NM2O has looked at the TI7W log from last year and made a list of the USA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-05/msg00075.html (7,718 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] What is a good prefix for the WPX Contest? (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:17:23 +0000
Not sure about weird or unusual, but a QSO that has stuck in my mind from many years ago was working A35NN in and ARRL DX CW contest. His exchange was 5NN NN. I remember it took me a few QSOs listeni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-05/msg00087.html (12,557 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:09:55 +0000
Good question Steve! If I recall, the category was first adopted by ARRL and then later by CQ WPX. Not sure that it's continuation has anything to do with RHR... I don't see much downside for it to c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00027.html (11,517 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Alternative Contest Operator Table (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:55:15 +0000
I think this might be what you are looking for. https://www.warca.org/ It is a contest operator ranking system that uses contest results from major contests over 3 years. It is not well know or easy
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00119.html (8,801 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Operating - Cross County (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:56:16 +0000
This is not a CQ or ARRL contest issue. It is a government regulations issue. It is also one where you may not want to ask the question and get and answer you did not expect... Good question Ed. Mike
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-07/msg00081.html (15,618 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Forum topic (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 13:35:08 +0000
The K1DG CTU presentation is excellent. Everyone should review it before the Fall contests! There is always going to be "stuff that happens" that causes some busts and NILs in your log. But, good to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00093.html (12,297 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 06:55:32 +0000
The CQ WW RTTY contest is going on this weekend. Runs until 0000z. I have yet to work anyone in NM, ND, VT, or MT. Bands have been great. Especially 15 meters. Almost like we have sunspots or somethi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00075.html (6,539 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2026/2027? (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 17:20:36 +0000
I believe it will depend greatly on whoever steps forward to organize the next WRTC. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00011.html (8,559 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu