Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6jek@comcast.net: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 07:31:15 -0700
Antenna Wax. It's a classic joke out here if not a very good one. Polished the antenna today with antenna wax. Maybe it wasn't a joke. Jon _______________________________________________ TenTec maili
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00007.html (11,079 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 08:17:17 -0700
How big are the ground losses? Are they the difference between an EZNEC prediction over perfect ground and what it says over average ground assuming average is what you have? Is it the difference bet
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00047.html (19,353 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 09:29:55 -0700
That's what I've been doing, modeling antennas at different heights over different grounds. But the pattern changes too. Dipoles become more omni directional. That by itself will change the maximum g
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00050.html (22,867 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 12:34:56 -0700
This is the quote I've wondered about. It's from Bob Orr, W6SAI's, Antenna Handbook. "Antenna radiation resistance is influenced by antenna height. Assume the antenna is an 80-meter dipole. A common
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00055.html (24,002 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 13:51:46 -0700
Steve, Where are you getting losses out of EZNEC? I did re-run the the dipole at 25 and 55. As expected, all sorts of things are different. But where are you reading losses? Jon _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00058.html (13,665 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 14:30:57 -0700
Thanks _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00062.html (12,187 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] PTO lube shelf life... (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:00:52 -0700
Roger, I'd go with PTFE (teflon) based grease. I haven't re-built a Ten-Tec PTO but I have re-built boat anchor PTOs. Lithium grease dried up after a few years and became an anti-lubricant. I was puz
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00070.html (9,684 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] [TenTec_Eagle] Re: Just ordered my Eagle (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:37:13 -0700
Or spend the least on radios. I call my Corsair my $200 radio for a reason. I got my Johnson KW Matchbox for nothing. Other radios, maybe I spent money on. One of the better reflectors, this one, sma
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00173.html (9,692 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Neverwet for ladder line (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:06:40 -0700
Here we go. New stuff to keep the water off our ladder line. This may ruin the long standing joke about antenna wax. The video is quite amusing: http://www.chonday.com/Videos/NeverWet-arrives-in-stor
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00072.html (6,734 bytes)

30. [TenTec] Herc II relay problem (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:27:45 -0700
Anyone familiar with the Hercules II relays? Mine now keeps the antenna disconnected from the transceiver (O7) whenever the amp is on. Pulled the amp on to the bench and sure enough IN doesn't connec
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00386.html (7,332 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Herc II relay problem (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:05:24 -0700
Correction. K3 is a reed relay. It appears to be toast. I still don't understand how it's supposed to work. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com h
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00390.html (7,953 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Herc II relays (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:08:55 -0700
Nice write up and pictures, Rick. I've saved it in case I need it. This must be International Hercules II Relay Week. I just solved a problem similar to yours caused by a different failed relay. When
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00415.html (9,140 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] 160 meters, ten ted 238 tuner, part two (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 18:47:40 -0700
Yes Jim, But if we draw the Venn diagram of RF Chokes and BALUN's I speculate there is something in the overlap, is there not? Jon _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00444.html (12,598 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Model 238 plastic cabinet cap source (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:58:40 -0800
The little decorative end pieces on the sides of the front panel of my trusty 238 are broken. The are little brown vertical pieces of plastic maybe 5" long, tapered, held on with little clips. I see
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00141.html (7,496 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Corsair noise blanker and frequency display (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:14:16 -0800
FWIW my Corsair does exactly the same thing on both counts. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00046.html (9,564 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:01:31 -0800
I know. As an aficionado of vintage equipment I agree in spirt. But on SSB it really is delightful to talk with people who are actually on frequency, a rarity with vintage gear but the norm now with
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00241.html (10,771 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:03:01 -0800
My experience is that with modern equipment, when people say they are on 3895 they actually are, +/- not much and they actually stay there. Land yourself on that number and you've got it. With older
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00246.html (14,560 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:03:39 -0800
Hey, We have a lot of the same equipment. I'm not the guy complaining about others. I'm the offending party. I have a lot of experience being off frequency. For years, maybe a decade I was in regular
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00252.html (17,667 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 19:11:56 -0800
Fine stuff. I have a 2B too. My CE 100V from 1959 was the best sounding SSB transmitter I had for a long time. I always get compliments even from the HiFi SSB people. Later when I got the OMNI VII an
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00261.html (11,616 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 00:30:35 -0800
They don't complain. They just advise. BTW, Jon, you're 50 Hz high or whatever. When we aren't doing a round table but just jumping in, I know it's annoying to be pushing the RIT whenever party X tra
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00266.html (14,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu