Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6ll@juno.com: 277 ]

Total 277 documents matching your query.

81. [TowerTalk] Stacking Distances (more info) (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 08:57:51 -0700
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999 13:38:56 -0000 "c penna" <clive@gm3poi.prestel.co.uk> writes: I I had the same thing happen to me. I had 3 el beams for 10, 15, 20 on a 10 foot mast. I thought everything was fine
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00413.html (7,949 bytes)

82. [TowerTalk] Wind Loading Question (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 07:31:34 -0600
I think the point that some people may be missing is that "projected area" of a piece of tubing is equal to diameter times length. For example, a 1" O.D. piece of tubing, 120 inches long, has a proje
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00417.html (9,315 bytes)

83. [TowerTalk] Plumbing a tower using a plumb bob (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 20:15:27 -0600
It doesn't have to go down the exact middle, as long as the hanging point and the bullseye are consistent. You could even run it spaced a few inches outside the tower. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00542.html (8,076 bytes)

84. [TowerTalk] t2x, c31xr and ef240x (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 12:22:19 -0600
Not really. turn radius x wt = effective moment c31xr 23.8 x 82 = 1952 ef240 25.1 x 38 = 954 mast 0.083 x 140 = 12 total effective moment = 2918 ft pounds. The t2x is rated for 3400 ft-lbs, so you ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00023.html (8,789 bytes)

85. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD and C3E (which on top) (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 15:26:24 -0600
If the C3 is your only antenna for 10, 15, and 20, I think 75' and 87' are both too high. You might think about adding a second C3 later, about 30' - 35' below the top one. Depending on how your guys
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00035.html (8,134 bytes)

86. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft A3 help (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 16:38:18 -0600
I asked the same question about a year ago, and below are excerpts from two messages on the subject. Cushcraft does NOT recommend disassembly of the traps, so the best way is to use the dip meter. Yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00270.html (9,591 bytes)

87. [TowerTalk] XM240 and Tribander Stacking (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:33:03 -0600
Another potential problem that can occur when close-stacking a 2 el 40 is that the unused feedline dangling off the 40m driven element can cause that element to become near-resonant on one of the tri
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00326.html (7,611 bytes)

88. [TowerTalk] Tower Height question (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 17:04:15 -0600
I've done the analysis between 50', 70', and 90' several times, using computer models, trying to decide whether it's worth the investment for me. The difference between 50' and 70' is 2 dB at the use
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00372.html (9,408 bytes)

89. [TowerTalk] Guy anchors (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 20:50:52 -0600
Rohn drawing B841300, near the back of the book, says "The portion of the steel anchors, from top of anchor block to ground level, shall be coated with Bitumen." I think they mean that gooey black ta
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00383.html (8,434 bytes)

90. [TowerTalk] Calculating Raised Guy Height-Lengths? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:06:34 -0600
Since horizontal distance is 80% of height, the answer is .8x7 = 5.6 feet. I'm not a soils expert, but 3 feet doesn't sound like enough. You could also back-guy the I-beam like the power companies do
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00630.html (9,526 bytes)

91. [TowerTalk] SS bolts in Aluminum (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:30:10 -0600
Perhaps you are thinking of a thread (no pun intended) that I started regarding the screws which hold the two halves of the HAM-M thru HAM-IV series rotors together. These are NOT the screws that sec
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00034.html (8,590 bytes)

92. [TowerTalk] Stacked tri-banders and 40m dipole - which antenna where? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:12:37 -0600
Another option is to put the top tribander AND the 40 dipole at 85', with the dipole parallel to the tribander boom. The 20' tribander boom shouldn't affect the dipole, especially if the tribander el
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00193.html (9,065 bytes)

93. [TowerTalk] Stacked tri-banders and 40m dipole - which antenna where? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 13:15:08 -0600
If you search the Towertalk archives, you will find a very nice article on gamma-matching the boom of a tribander for use on 40 meters. Apparently it works quite well. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL San Dieg
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00196.html (8,507 bytes)

94. [TowerTalk] Re: bracketed Rohn 25 (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:18:04 -0600
The Rohn manual is about the best there is. There are so many variations in tower configurations that it always seems to come down to a table of some sort. This reflector is a good way to get the tab
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00299.html (10,696 bytes)

95. [TowerTalk] $/db (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 12:10:28 -0600
Don't forget to double the benefit if any change helps also on RECEIVE. Multiply the benefit by X if the change helps on X number of bands. Transmit benefit only. Rx is atmospheric noise limited. I t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00314.html (9,716 bytes)

96. [TowerTalk] Tower on a downslope (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 20:11:35 -0600
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999 19:29:29 -0700 "Rod Brink" <rodbrink@montereybay.com> writes: The program YTAD, which will provide a specific answer to this question for your particular terrain, is available fre
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00380.html (8,647 bytes)

97. [TowerTalk] C31XR & XM-240 (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:15:47 -0600
I have a similar setup, a big KLM tribander just above the thrust bearing, and a 40-2CD Cushcraft short 40 just 6 feet above the tribander. The booms are in-line, not rotated 90 degrees, and everythi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00395.html (9,218 bytes)

98. [TowerTalk] laser pointer for setting guy tension (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 13:44:15 -0600
Harbor Freight has a laser pointer for $5.99 that they say will project a 1/4 inch dot at 600 feet. So you make a little jig to set this thing pointing vertically at the base of the tower in the exac
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00414.html (8,207 bytes)

99. [TowerTalk] Thanks for input (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 09:53:07 -0600
Wayne Overbeck, N6NB, ran a series of comparison tests on various yagis vs. quads many years ago. The results were published in a national ham radio magazine, "Ham Radio," I believe. One of the findi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00528.html (8,745 bytes)

100. [TowerTalk] Small tribander & AB-577 (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 11:24:14 -0600
The Hy-Gain TH-2 is another small antenna that performs very well. As I remember N6NB's antenna gain measurements many years ago, the TH-2 was used as a reference and had surprising gain for an anten
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00114.html (8,063 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu