Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6sti@att.net: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Soil Probe Calculator (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:47:10 -0800
Jim, Rudy Severns, N6LF, is developing a new 24" soil probe. In the process he discovered that common-mode current on the long cable he runs to his desktop computer from his older VNA can seriously
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-12/msg00115.html (8,809 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] My take on small power differences (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 17:31:05 -0700
I've been told I should post a link to this writeup I did several years ago: http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/pileup.htm As noted in the analysis limitations section, I'm not sure how much it really adds.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-05/msg00129.html (7,815 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Tribanders (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:37:51 -0700
Here's how TA handled stacking: -- STACKED ANTENNAS -- TA can plot the pattern for a pair of antennas with vertical and/or horizontal offset. First snapshot the pattern with the antenna at one stacki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-06/msg00051.html (9,624 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Wideband Antenna Models with Coils (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:54:16 -0800
This writeup uses a trapped triband Yagi to show how to create wideband models for antennas with coils: http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/wbc.htm The method uses an updated version of my coil inductance and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-11/msg00169.html (7,015 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:28:59 -0800
K9YC: "The likely unknown here is the soil characteristic plugged into the model, as compared to what we have. :)" I'll use this as an excuse to plug my ground probe calculator. Build your own ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00037.html (8,158 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] 16om vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 08:46:15 -0800
Rob, K5UJ: "For US hams wanting to get a rough idea of where they land in the ground conductivity lottery, you can look at the high def. FCC map and either cheer or weep. But, keep in mind, the bound
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00049.html (9,915 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] 16om vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 10:21:41 -0800
Paul, W9AC: "Isn't the measured probe result only useful for near-field system efficiency analysis? By near-field I mean to obtain system efficiency within a wavelength or so of a vertical radiator.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00055.html (10,519 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Traps? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 15:21:14 -0800
The example shows how to automatically optimize an antenna with traps: http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/wbc.htm The trap resonance result deserves further study. Optimizing a 10/15m trapped dipole gave the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00010.html (7,717 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Traps? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:51:57 -0800
I tried optimizing a loaded dipole for 3.525 and 7.025 MHz. I used an RLC load to properly represent a self-resonant coil. After optimization, the load wound up out 40.5' on a 53.9' wire (one side of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00016.html (9,406 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Traps? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 15:36:28 -0800
I probably should have included this image of a full-length, resonant, 3/2-wavlength dipole: https://i.postimg.cc/2Sq0dJTd/full.gif Brian _______________________________________________ _____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00018.html (8,097 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Traps? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 18:17:30 -0800
Since we're on the subject of loading coils, I wanted to pass along an interesting practical study of coil loss due to corrosion: https://www.w0qe.com/Technical_Topics/inductor_Q_tests.html I mention
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00020.html (8,730 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Ground Probe Calculator (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 02:42:26 -0800
A ground probe lets you measure your local ground permittivity and conductivity for antenna analysis. Accurate models of verticals and low horizontal wires need realistic values. The probe uses two m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00038.html (7,893 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] DIY Air Wound Coils (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:56:51 -0800
Helpful article on the properties of various 3D-printing plastics: https://www.3dnatives.com/en/plastics-used-3d-printing110420174/ Check the dielectric constant and dissipation factor of the plastic
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00060.html (8,264 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] DIY Air Wound Coils (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:54:48 -0800
Can you cite some examples of plastics that have high loss at HF and low loss at UHF or vice versa?  I've never encountered that phenomenon. Rick, see CUSTOMIZE.TXT in gnd.zip (download from the COIL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00062.html (8,963 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] DIY Air Wound Coils (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 17:15:30 -0800
"My final choice was slotted acrylic bars for strength, water and UV resistance, and ease of solvent gluing the wires in place." Grant, after seeing several neat coil form designs in the style of Air
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00064.html (8,108 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] Hairpin Match Calculator (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:01:21 -0800
I've applied the Getsinger corrections for transmission line end effects to leads in my coil calculator (http://ham-radio.com/k6sti/coil.htm) and rods in my ground probe calculator (http://ham-radio.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-12/msg00029.html (8,642 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Hairpin Match Calculator (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:42:19 -0800
Accurately calculating rod length and antenna reactance for a hairpin match turned out to be more complicated than I expected. I realized pretty quickly that my boom model was dubious. I abandoned it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-01/msg00028.html (9,172 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Hairpin Match Calculator (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 03:09:25 -0800
"NEC does use a simplified model for the "wire" - it takes into account dielectrics and skin effect (I'm in the middle of figuring out what ZINT does, which is the core of the "resistance and inducta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-01/msg00030.html (8,516 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] New N6LF Ground Probe Designs (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:44:40 -0800
Rudy Severns, N6LF, has updated his writeup on ground parameter measurement with several new probe designs. A ground probe and NanoVNA let you measure the permittivity and conductivity of your local
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-03/msg00001.html (8,307 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] New N6LF Ground Probe Designs (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 12:10:09 -0800
Rick, see Rudy's original writeup where he goes into this in great detail. His recent update is just an update on that earlier work. He doesn't repeat the basics. It only gives a spot measurement of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2024-03/msg00006.html (12,586 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu