Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6xt@pacbell.net: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: GP vs. Vertical (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 23:52:12 -0800
Well I just can't stay away from this discussion. I'm loading a tower as a ground plane on 160. The ant use 4 radials strapped to the tower at 32 feet elevation, with shunt feed connected at (about)
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00227.html (7,988 bytes)

2. TopBand: FT1000 key clicks (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 23:52:17 -0800
At risk of heat: Several years ago in the pages of that august journal, the San Diego DX Club Bulletin, I published the results of some measurements I conducted on the CW capabilities of 3 rigs I was
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00228.html (7,616 bytes)

3. TopBand: GP vs. Vertical (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:03:53 -0800
Bill I don't know if it will work "better" with more radials. Not going to try for more than 6, which I'll roll out next season. The feed impedance altered !microscopically! with the change from 3 to
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00236.html (8,477 bytes)

4. TopBand: vertical v. gp (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 22:15:19 -0800
Tom makes a very good point, perhaps, but widely missed the point of my comments. I made absolutely no assertion that my 160 feed point impedance had anything at all to do with the antenna efficiency
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00245.html (7,987 bytes)

5. TopBand: ant switch (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 22:15:21 -0800
Wayne Same deal here. I use Icom in conjunction with a 10 ft high 160 dipole for receive. Both Rx and the dipole are grounded thru 50 ohms on transmit with a small relay. The relay is powered directl
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00246.html (7,512 bytes)

6. TopBand: elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 22:41:23 -0800
Joe My personal experience is that the elevated radials are the equal of a ton of buried copper and deserve serious consideration. As you point out, in bang for the buck terms, a few elevated radials
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00290.html (11,809 bytes)

7. TopBand: elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: k6xt@pacbell.net (Art Charette)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:31:18 -0800
Actually, I'm something of a computer guru. Software like email included. I know how. It's my policy to always send the original message back to the originator so (s)he knows what the reply is all ab
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00306.html (9,842 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu