Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7xcnv1@gmail.com: 88 ]

Total 88 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why so few New England rovers? (score: 1)
Author: k7xcnv1 <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:05:37 -0700
Be wary of using the 746 with transverters as ALL power levels regardless of band are set by the front panel power pot.  Easy to forget in the heat of the contest while rover.  I was a very active an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-06/msg00107.html (17,587 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Height vs. foliage (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 19:25:51 +0000
Six Meters Propagation is NOT directly tied to sunspots except for long haul DX using F2... Often requiring the flux to reach 175/200 or better! Not a common occurrence. However... I have worked Most
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00087.html (10,846 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Yagis on masts (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:27:47 +0000
As one who was a rover for over 30 years (often in the top 5 nationally) please let me offer some common sense.. (1) I cant think of any reason to carry a 50 ft pushup mast... A 20 footer would make
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-12/msg00035.html (11,025 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Pat Dyer, WA5IYX--Propagation Researcher-SK (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:48:38 +0000
In my years as a VHFer I always had a great respect for Pat and his research. We exchanged emails a bit back when I wrote for "CQ VHF" in the late 90s and learned alot from his sharing . Its a sad da
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00062.html (9,940 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] K7XC DM09jh QRV Tonight (score: 1)
Author: k7xcnv1 <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:49:59 -0700
Hello all! Dug out the 6ele 6M yagi and got it back in the air a few days ago. Plan to do the same thing with the 16ele 2M yagi this afternoon.  Look for me grom DM09jh, Silver Springs Nevada tonight
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-04/msg00031.html (6,686 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF/UHF Panadapting (score: 1)
Author: k7xcnv1 <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:23 -0700
Both posted links were dead. Tim Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android device-- Original message --From: Huff David J <HuffDavidJ@JohnDeere.com> Date: 4/25/2017 08:11 (GMT-08:00) To: vhfcontesting@con
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-04/msg00077.html (10,562 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Date for January VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: k7xcnv1 <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 02:31:21 -0700
The real question is why its not between the AFC / NFC  championships and the Superbowl, like it used to be before the league added another week of football? Damn silly to not slide it a week to incr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-05/msg00082.html (8,091 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] K7XC Single OP 3B from DM09jh, June VHF QSO Party This Weekend (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 19:21:37 +0000
For this years June Contest I will be QRV from home here in DM09jh, Silver Springs NV. Using 6ele at 30' and 100W on 6M & 11 ele at 25' and 100W on 2M. No 222 or 432 this time. Will be QRV on CW, SSB
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00063.html (7,018 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] June VHF contest results (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:17:59 +0000
Congrats on a great score! Looks like you were a busy boy! 73s and GL de Tim - K7XC - DM09jh... sk Adapt, Overcome, Succeed! _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00095.html (9,296 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Beta Release: WSJT-X Version 1.8.0-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:30:40 +0000
Good Morning Everyone... I used FT8 the day it was released. Its was clearly not done and needing to evolve but that early version was very impressive! It has only got better since. The latest versio
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00023.html (11,618 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m JT65 at -1 (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 02:07:24 +0000
It Makes NO SENSE AT ALL! FT8 or JT9E would be a much better way to go.... JT65 as a 6M terrestrial Mode is a waste of time compared to what can be done in the same time with a MODERN mode DESIGNED F
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00028.html (9,668 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 2m (score: 1)
Author: k7xcnv1 <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:16:13 -0700
It has to be above 144.100 by law. Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android device-- Original message --From: Nick Pick <nicolasgagnon@hotmail.fr> Date: 7/12/2017 07:04 (GMT-08:00) To: vhfcontesting@cont
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00035.html (7,679 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 2m (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:04:46 +0000
Take a moment to look at the IARU Region 2 band plan proposal at: https://wsjtx.net/home/proposed_band_plan.html He makes some valid points not to mention his website is a wonderful resource of VHF+
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00037.html (9,383 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 on 2m (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:10:45 +0000
I would suggest we don't place a terrestrial Digital signal in the Middle of traditionally a CW EME passband. What about above .300 like around 144.313? Well below any FM activity on the band plan. 7
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00045.html (8,792 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] K7XC Single Op DM09jh 50 & 144 MHz (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 18:01:17 +0000
Hi Folks, I will QRV from home in Silver Springs NV - DM09jh Will be on 6 and 2 Meters CW SSB FM FT8 & MSK 100W and 6ele @ 28 ft for 6M 100W and 11ele @ 24 ft for 2M Watching the cali vhf/uhf page ht
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00025.html (7,563 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] September VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:31:06 +0000
Notice the man with the rant has the highest score because he did the work of juggling all those distractions and managed to operate well. Yes it sounds like a bitch but that's what separates the win
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00047.html (23,312 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] On Line Sept VHF Log Submission to ARRL Problem (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:41:16 +0000
Pete, Why not use the ARRL Log Submission website that allows you to input only the data and it does the formatting etc for you. I dont remember the URL but a quick look at the rules would surely rev
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00048.html (9,944 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] The digital modes and the Sept contest.... (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:57:53 +0000
The point folks that you all have missed is the new FT8 mode gives people with NO CW SKILLS the power of CW without having to learn it. It also automates most of the process making it easier to multi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00070.html (12,394 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] ROVER Power Needs And Solutions during a VHF Contest. (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:05:14 +0000
For what its worth... I was a very competitive Single and Multi Op Mountaintop Portable in the June VHF contests for over 20 years. In that same time period during the Sept and January events I elect
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00113.html (22,795 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] ROVER Power Needs And Solutions during a VHF Contest. (score: 1)
Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:06:14 +0000
Connect them in series with no load present. You never cross these terminals or allow them to reach ground. Very simple and safe. There should be no worries working with these batteries if you don't
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00116.html (28,930 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu