I have filed a Petition for Rulemaking with the FCC, asking that they finally address covenant restrictions under PRB-1. 2 previous Petitions for Reconsideration by the ARRL have been denied, but I a
Don definitely got the better deal!!! :-) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
I just did, using a trial version of CHM2PDF, so it has a banner at the top of each page declaring that it "was created with the unregistered version of CHM2PDF", but othe than that, it appears to be
You could try temporarily setting the desktop to a higher resolution, and seeing if you can grab the top of the VC window then, and drag it down near the bottom of the screen, then go back to your or
Be absolutely FANATICAL about hand-washing, Don, or use plenty of waterless hand sanitizer: after some very minor flooding here in the Chicago area back in the 90's, many people wound up with systemi
I am not a contester... After my KAM-E died, I used TrueTTY ($20 to register, but functional even unregistered) until MMTTY came out. I now use MMTTY exclusively - better demod under poor conditions
Ooops........ TrueTTY is now $39 to register, not $20. A couple of nice features, though: it does some other modes, such as AMTOR, AX25 (HF and VHF), ASCII-7 and -8, PSK, MFSK-16, and it decodes touc
ARQ and FEC normal or fast sync! Just downloaded the latest version, and am going to test it against MMTTY again. It's been a while, so I want to see if Sergei has improved the decoding. Just gotta f
Don't you mean 599 EASY? (couldn't resist..............) George, KA3HSW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
Number one is covered, in general terms, by 97.101, 97.105, and 97.109(d). Number two is already explicitly covered in 97.309 (a)(4). _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
Okay, to play devil's advocate: just WHAT would you have the software listen for, to determine that a frequency is in use? I'm no software engineer either, but it doesn't take one to figure out that
But since the horse is out of the barn, so to speak, that's not likely to happen, so parking them on fixed, known frequencies is probably the best solution. I really don't see any other way... now th
Still not buying it, Joe... all that is necessary is to record the offending signal & send the recording to the FCC. No need to decode it at all. That's still "self-policing" - and it has worked just
If it's an INTERFERING signal, the CONTENT is irrelevant!! Which interference is.... See above _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.conte
End of discussion. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! You seem to be forgetting that amateur radio is an INTERNATIONAL hobby... The requirement that digital protocols be publicly documented is an ITU rule, echoed in the FCC rules. O
And it would have ZERO impact, because all of the new protocols & software developed OUTSIDE the US would be unaffected by the ban. You are welcome to file a Petition for Rulemaking: I guarantee you
And it would have ZERO impact, because all of the new protocols & software developed OUTSIDE the US would be unaffected by the ban. You are welcome to file a Petition for Rulemaking: I guarantee you
Radio Shack used to sell a tool called a "nibbler" that would very quickly turn a 3/8" round hole into a square, rectangle, or whatever shape you wanted.... I have one and have made EXTENSIVE use of