Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb0fhp@comcast.net: 212 ]

Total 212 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TowerTalk] Good manners (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:33:36 -0400
so has the FT817 group on Yahoo....terrible. A general demise in manners and civility... Yeah, rec.radio.amateur.antenna has just gotten obliterated in the last couple of weeks. _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg01000.html (8,750 bytes)

122. [TowerTalk] TVI and Direct TV (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:49:44 -0400
My new neighbor, a football coach, just installed a DirectTV dish approximately 30 feet from the site of my tower, and approximately 12 feet up. My tower was going to be approximately 40' tall, with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00099.html (6,786 bytes)

123. Re: [TowerTalk] TVI and Direct TV (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 18:02:38 -0400
Even running a KW? BTW, my station is clean. I have a TV located approximately 8 feet away from the amp without any issues. Scott --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00101.html (9,410 bytes)

124. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking V-UHF antennas. (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:38:25 -0400
There was an excellent write-up at the website directive systems regarding stacking.... Should answer your questions. www.directivesystems.com Scott Am I correct in my thinking that when you stack 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00308.html (8,298 bytes)

125. [TowerTalk] American Tower (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:13:08 -0400
Is the American Tower Base compatible with the Rohn 25G - would I expect any problems? Scott _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00401.html (6,480 bytes)

126. [TowerTalk] Tower Identification - STB 12 (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:50:31 -0400
Have an opportunity to obtain a 40' crank up tower. Marked with STB12 on the legs. 40' feet tall, nested to 20'. Sections are triangular, and nest into each other. I am trying to identify the manufac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00492.html (6,802 bytes)

127. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 meter loop (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:27:53 -0400
I think it depends on what you want....From you description, I gather you are putting the loop up vertically - if so, it will be an excellent performer for DX (from ON4UN's book), when loaded to prov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00512.html (8,463 bytes)

128. Re: [TowerTalk] "A Horizontal Loop for 80 Meter DX" (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:51:59 -0500
It does work for DX. I have done it. You have to get it up in the air a considerable amount - However, it is primarily a cloud burner, with most of the radiation straight up in the air. I personally
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00054.html (8,900 bytes)

129. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vee vs. Dipole QRN (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:49:57 -0500
That only assumes that the dipole is up high enough to matter - and to show the 2 typical lobes - this would have to be at least 1 wavelength - and more than likely, substantially higher - like 3-4 w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00080.html (9,325 bytes)

130. Re: [TowerTalk] Urban Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:06:05 -0500
While I also rely on friends in the country for contesting, I use a variety of antennas at my meager suburban lot. I use a Gap Titan for 10-40M, and wire vertical with capacitance hat for 80M contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00109.html (10,503 bytes)

131. Re: [TowerTalk] Max Unguyed Rohn 25 height to support dipole end (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:59:06 -0500
height is 40 feet - with a 1.5 ft^2 loading - no ice. Scott --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of KDM Sent: Friday, Novemb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00237.html (8,870 bytes)

132. Re: [TowerTalk] Max Unguyed Rohn 25 height to support dipole end (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:18:45 -0500
OK - I was assuming that the dipole was going to be at the center and draped inverted V style. I didn't think about using multiple towers - guess that is what happens when I assume. When set up as an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00242.html (9,789 bytes)

133. Re: [TowerTalk] Max Unguyed Rohn 25 height to support dipole end (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:44:27 -0500
THe Rohn Catalog recommends temporary guys when climbing....but the big question is - how do you guy the top if you can't climb it? Hello Ken I think you would over load that 40' when you climb it.20
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00259.html (11,599 bytes)

134. [TowerTalk] Dumb Question (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:22:06 -0500
I am trying to set up a set of 2 phased verticals in a similar fashion to this: http://home.comcast.net/~kb0fhp/80M_Vertical/80M_Vertical.htm With the limited space I have available, I have decided t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00459.html (7,568 bytes)

135. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing 2 Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:48:11 -0500
Thanks for the help Jim: I was looking at using a Christman feed system per OH4UN Low Band Dxing (p 11-34 3rd edition). It looks like the simplest and best way to accomplish the match. I just need to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00482.html (9,704 bytes)

136. Re: [TowerTalk] Earth Station Radio Site, complete,Avaialable for Purchase (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:08:31 -0500
Interesting - when I looked at it in Google Earth, a portion of the area was "fuzzed out" - but I was able to see the dish very nicely. --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00563.html (10,474 bytes)

137. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Vertical Opinions NEEDED... (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:15:34 -0500
Actually - the report that K7LXC did, is a good, well written report, with good experimental data to back up the claims. It certainly helped me make an informed decision based on DATA as opposed to o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00712.html (11,038 bytes)

138. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m inverted l (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:42:18 -0500
I keep cutting and cutting - and it is still too short If you've got an antenna analyzer like the MFJ-359, you can see where the SWR is minimum. Cut off a few inches of antenna. See where the new min
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00231.html (12,040 bytes)

139. Re: [TowerTalk] OT - Milky-Way setting behind the HF tower (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:27:27 -0500
Nice Images - my efforts at astophotography pale to your excellent and publication quality images. I really enjoyed them! Scott KB0FHP Being off work for a neck surgery and then a back injury I had s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00534.html (9,744 bytes)

140. [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated - Equipment Wanted (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:31:50 -0500
Since this is the end of Amateur Radio, and so many of you are quitting in disgust, your equipment is now worthless. Please make a list for me, and I will pick it up for you, so you don't have to sen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00594.html (10,141 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu