Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb0fhp@comcast.net: 212 ]

Total 212 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] Extending a concrete base? (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:39:50 -0400
I would also look at drilling the old concrete and putting in some concrete anchors or rebar that has been appropriately bend. In addition to the chemical treatments, this will help with the mechanic
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00773.html (9,767 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager failure (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:18:04 -0400
As an aside - I had absolutely no problems getting a new capacitor from them - I had one for the high part of the band - and needed on for the DX window - I called, and sent in my check - it arrived
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00165.html (9,855 bytes)

163. Re: [TowerTalk] Loose rotor bolts (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:09:43 -0400
Can you take pictures of the fracture surfaces of the bolts - really good close ups? I may be able to take a look and tell you why - fatigue, overload or?... Scott --Original Message-- From: towertal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00811.html (11,376 bytes)

164. Re: [TowerTalk] Installation Rohn 25G (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:14:23 -0500
That is not quite true. It depends on the height and load rating. From the Rohn Catalog (Revised 2004), Dwg # A871266R, 25G is self supporting, and they provide the allowable loading and height....Fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00239.html (11,341 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] Installation Rohn 25G (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:51:08 -0500
That is absolutely true - a larger base is needed. But I was just putting my 2 cents worth regarding the self-supporting 25G And yoiu forgot to mention a totally different Rohn drawing for the free s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00247.html (9,331 bytes)

166. Re: [TowerTalk] Installation Rohn 25G (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:31:53 -0500
Bracketing makes all the difference in the world. Looking at the Rohn catalog, it makes a huge difference in the load carrying capacity whether they are freestanding or bracketed. Your results do not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00253.html (12,660 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G Tower (score: 1)
Author: kb0fhp@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:53:49 +0000
Follow the manufacturers instructions, and unguyed RG25 is acceptable. Obviously, free standing to 70+ feet does not meet the manufacturers recommendation. Rohn 25G can be self supporting per the man
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00291.html (13,060 bytes)

168. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter receiving loop antenna schematic hasbeenposted (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:25:04 -0500
What size would you suggest for 80M? --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richard (Rick) Karlquist Sent: Tuesday, January
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-01/msg00016.html (9,201 bytes)

169. Re: [TowerTalk] Fees for Amateur Radio (score: 1)
Author: kb0fhp@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:15:42 +0000
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00120.html (9,930 bytes)

170. Re: [TowerTalk] Johnson Matchbox (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:19:16 -0400
There was an article in QST several years ago, where they indicated that it was rated for AM service with a lot of extra heft for additional safety.... I think you will find that they were rated for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00279.html (9,501 bytes)

171. Re: [TowerTalk] CD-44 & HAM4 controller, Mosley A-320 Manual (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:34:11 -0400
You need to check the serial number on the bottom of the rotor. I trashed my rotor (series II) by using a newer (series III box). I just got a NOS CD-44 with controller at the Timonium Hamfest, and I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00635.html (9,542 bytes)

172. Re: [TowerTalk] TOWER PERMIT (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:31:05 -0400
Spend the money and buy a stamp...At least on the East Coast there is reciprocity for most stuff - but California doesn't accept other PE paper as valid - so others do not consider California stamps
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00091.html (9,131 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical plans (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:35:22 -0400
If you can't put up a full size 4 square array with at least 5 miles of radial field - you are wasting your time and any one else that will have to try and hear your puny signal. It is a waste of mon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00092.html (10,816 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical plans (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:31:49 -0400
That was what I was told - that I would be wasting my time and time of everyone else by putting up a simple vertical on 80M. Then I guess I've been wasting my time working 192 countries on 75m with a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00106.html (9,957 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical plans (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:00:20 -0400
Actually the website is out of date. It is approximately 285 countries, and 7000 contacts. I believe you misread it. Not as many as those here. However as I have been told here numerous times - anyth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00113.html (10,266 bytes)

176. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical plans (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:01:01 -0400
I think the you are the only one to have gotten it correct..... I think the problem is that sarcasm doesn't work well in print, guys ;-) contacts on 80M using a Gap Titan I don't believe you have an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00114.html (10,415 bytes)

177. Re: [TowerTalk] Ultrabeam (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:05:44 -0400
A lot depends on where they got the patents. For instance, if they got the patents in only the US, then I don't think it would be valid in Europe. I know when we file a patent, it is filed in Eu, US
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00471.html (9,019 bytes)

178. [TowerTalk] Matching Sections - Modified Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 12:20:40 -0400
Gentlemen: I have modified an old CC 215WB 2M beam which was purchased used. Previously, it used to have a triagonal reflector. It was previously modified using a more conventional single reflector.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00156.html (8,143 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] Matching Sections - Modified Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 16:00:12 -0400
Thanks Ralph. I have the manual - I was able to download it. One issue that I have, is that I substantially modified the antenna. The only thing I kept was the matching section and the driven element
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00166.html (9,699 bytes)

180. Re: [TowerTalk] Matching Sections - Modified Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 19:43:23 -0400
Thank you John. The antenna in question is not a split element design - it uses a ingle element with a delta match. Something like: __________________ -- Where one leg is the shield and one side is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00168.html (11,629 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu