Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb3aug@juno.com: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT 9.65 and Cabrillo Question (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:14:34 -0500
I used 9.65 last weekend and did the Writelog today. When I look at the Cabrillo file it has a number 1 on the left side between each QSO line. I have been using 9.65 since it was the latest version
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00034.html (6,973 bytes)

2. [ct-user] CT 9.65 and Cabrillo Question (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 00:35:30 -0500
My mistake! I looked at the file in DOS and it was placing the 1 at the end of each QSO on the next line all by it's self. Looking at the file in Wordpad it looks fine. Thought there was a problem be
/archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00035.html (7,891 bytes)

3. [ct-user] Trouble with Callouts (Announce) window (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:22:26 -0500
I'm still using CT 9.65 and have never had a problem with it until this weekend. I ran Single Unlimited and had comtsr 1 and 2 loaded. The Communications Setup window was correct also. The radio and
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00103.html (7,154 bytes)

4. [ct-user] FT1000(not D or MP) rig interface problem (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:33:01 -0500
Pete, When you loaded the comtsr I did not see where you loaded the -I for IRQ number. Did you forget to do that? Mine is comtsr1 -b4800 -n82 -i4. 73, Bill KV3R On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:40:52 -0500 Pet
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00110.html (9,403 bytes)

5. [ct-user] FT1000(not D or MP) rig interface problem (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:51:37 -0500
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:58:24 -0800 (PST) Jim Reisert <ad1c@yahoo.com> writes: And now I find out that I have been typing all that and didn't need to.... 73, Bill KV3R
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00118.html (8,223 bytes)

6. [ct-user] IARU writearrl and date (9.45) (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (kb3aug@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 20:42:23 -0400
When I do a writearrl the date comes out as, 08/07/100. Is it ok to submit it this way? The ARRL asks for no headers or page breaks correct? If I do a writelog the dates are correct. With either one
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-07/msg00056.html (7,183 bytes)

7. [ct-user] B2R9 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Hinkle <kb3aug@juno.com> (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:30:31 -0500
Hello All, I just got around to doing a Writelog today for CQWW. The 99CQWW.ALL file has all the times and dates correct. I did B2R9 to be able to import the contest log into my everyday logging prog
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00128.html (7,245 bytes)

8. [ct-user] Master.dta files for DX and SS (score: 1)
Author: Bill Hinkle <kb3aug@juno.com> (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 22:34:28 -0400
I down loaded 9.45 and the master data files, DX and SS. They are both named master.dta. Do I want to change the names to masterDX and masterSS? Or to something else? I'm not sure I will want to use
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00124.html (7,410 bytes)

9. [ct-user] CTY files (score: 1)
Author: Bill Hinkle <kb3aug@juno.com> (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:56:09 -0400
If I understand this right, I do not need ARRL.CTY, CQWW.CTY and IARU.CTY files if I'm using 9.45, just the CTY.DAT file. Is this correct? 73, Bill KB3AUG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Admin
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00139.html (6,590 bytes)

10. [ct-user] FT-1000 Communications (score: 1)
Author: Bill Hinkle <kb3aug@juno.com> (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 00:46:49 -0400
Ron, I do not see the -I switch for the IRQ number. Mine is COMTSR1 -b4800 -n82 -i4 Give that a try. 73, Bill KB3AUG -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@co
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-07/msg00014.html (7,682 bytes)

11. [ct-user] DVP Questions (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle) (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 22:21:55 -0400
Hello All, I never thought I would get rid of my old trusty 386SX-16 Ham puter but, I picked up a 486DX4-100 with Windows 95 on it for almost nothing. I want to have Cluster and rig control along wit
/archives//html/CT-User/1998-06/msg00083.html (7,530 bytes)

12. [ct-user] DOS CT to continue (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle) (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 20:57:29 -0500
Thank God, I have a pentium 133 that sits across the room from my rig and it makes lots of noise on 160 and 75 when it's turned on. My old trusty 386 SX-16 is the Ham puter and it still works like a
/archives//html/CT-User/1998-03/msg00064.html (8,121 bytes)

13. [ct-user] Video card problems (score: 1)
Author: kb3aug@juno.com (Bill Hinkle) (Bill Hinkle)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 16:06:44 -0500
I am running CT 9.31 and having trouble with the Video display showing the spots. On some calls it will miss some of the call or freq. I have the same problem with Logic 4, my logging program. The Vi
/archives//html/CT-User/1997-11/msg00151.html (7,155 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu