Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb9cry@comcast.net: 288 ]

Total 288 documents matching your query.

181. [TowerTalk] Subject: Shunt Fed Trylon 72 Ft for 160? (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:17:49 +0000
I do close to the same as Gene does for my Trylon 72 ft tower. I use a cage of three wires held out about 2 ft from the tower with PVC pipe. See piks at link below. They terminate about 35 ft above g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00638.html (8,017 bytes)

182. Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Shunt Fed Trylon 72 Ft for 160? (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:51:16 +0000
Hey, brilliant minds think alike. But, I don't think you have the same high tech lid securing device that I use???!!! <vbg> C all on Top Band, Phil KB9CRY ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00643.html (9,439 bytes)

183. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated guys to aN extreme (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:12:08 +0000
I don't think that the guys mean to burn your ears Mark. Your own remarks in your write-up on the website tend to steer us in that direction. You may have been lucky the past 5 years and/or the whole
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00647.html (8,031 bytes)

184. [TowerTalk] Making a self-supporting tower rotate (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:08:07 +0000
Why go through the bother of engineering a rotating self supporting tower? You are certainly going to have to have a structural engineer bless any design. Personally I use a rotator and just turn the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00241.html (7,386 bytes)

185. Re: [TowerTalk] Screw Anchor Question (score: 1)
Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:45:10 -0600
Don't take this personally, but IMHO screw anchors are only to be used for a temporary installation. A 70 ft. tower is a sizable structure and needs adequate anchors, meaning, anchors that have concr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00293.html (7,347 bytes)

186. [TowerTalk] Screw Anchors (score: 1)
Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:04:18 -0600
I'm sure screw anchors do have a place somewhere. And some folks have successfully used them to hold up amateur radio towers with antennas on them. However, and even if you use deadman concrete ancho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00347.html (7,157 bytes)

187. [TowerTalk] Locating Buried Feedline (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:27:45 +0000
I'm getting ready to trench in a cable line to a new tower, and before I do, I'd like to mark where the existing cables are buried, particularly near the shack where they all come together. Any ideas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00095.html (8,734 bytes)

188. [TowerTalk] radials for a 4 sq system (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:48:28 +0000
Correct me if I am wrong, but I had heard that terminating and tying each of the radials to a common bus line where they intesect it to be the prefered way now; and that is why Com Tek shows this met
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00142.html (6,967 bytes)

189. [TowerTalk] re TitanDX (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:09:53 +0000
I'm joining this thread late and have not read all the previous posts but the Titan Dx is 25 ft tall and per GAP, it does not require guys. That said if the desire is the guy it, 3/8 size rope is way
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00424.html (7,288 bytes)

190. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 pier pins (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:09:28 +0000
There is no such thing as a "2 pier pin" base. The Rohn flat plate for use with a pier pin installation is to be used with a single pier pin. These plates are not to be bolted down. I think you do no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00455.html (7,767 bytes)

191. [TowerTalk] Fall Arrest Reels (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:22:20 +0000
Do a Google search on Fall Arrest Reels and you'll find many kinds. We use them at work and have them "permanently" mounted on fixed attachment points where workers routinely have to use fall protect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00266.html (7,217 bytes)

192. [TowerTalk] Fall Arrest Forces (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:30:15 +0000
What I remember from my safety training (Plant Enginner & EHS Manager for major chemical manufacturing firm) is that when you fall without any shock absorbing device, the forces on your body (typical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00307.html (7,331 bytes)

193. [TowerTalk] Soldering Ground Connections (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:49:00 +0000
This should never be done, period. The reason is, think about it, during a major energy surge event, tremendous heat may be present during large current flows and any kind of soldering/brazing/etc wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00164.html (6,831 bytes)

194. [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Cadwelding vs Silver Solder for GroundRadial, Systems (score: 1)
Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:31:57 -0500
DO NOT Solder (or braze or anything like that) any ground connections. NEC only allows mechanical or exothermic connections. (I wonder why?) As pointed out, CadWelds are NOT expensive and you get the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00278.html (7,215 bytes)

195. Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Cadwelding vs Silver Solder for GroundRadial, Systems (score: 1)
Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:24:40 -0500
As can be seen from the info below from Wikipedia and from Erico, CadWelds involved much higher temperatures and a totally different joining process than brazing or soldering. This type of connection
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00287.html (14,122 bytes)

196. [TowerTalk] SECOND FLOOR SHACK (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:37:49 +0000
Have you thoroughly read through the Polyphaser and ICE (Industrial Communications Engineers) technical articles yet? If no, then do so than ask your questions, please. Also a search through the Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00385.html (6,835 bytes)

197. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Installation (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:53:05 +0000
IMHO Use solid bare copper wire to connect to the ground rods, #4 bare solid at min. No need to tie each legs' ground radial together, they're already tied together at the tower. Polyphaser recommend
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00603.html (7,532 bytes)

198. [TowerTalk] Towers and Sea Birds (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:11:49 +0000
I've had two hawks take up perch on my 120 ft. tower and 40M beam. Keeps most others away as well as squirrels and rabbits. However, I'm not so excited to make my annual inspection climb!! Phil KB9CR
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00716.html (7,999 bytes)

199. [TowerTalk] SPG (score: 1)
Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:03:00 -0500
I have a vertical on a large flat metal roof. Around the edge of the building is a lightning rod system using pointed air terminals and dedicated ground wires down the side of the building to ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00790.html (7,895 bytes)

200. [TowerTalk] Ground Windows (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:19 +0000
My shack is at the other end 72 ft. away. I intend on installing polyphaser coax and rotor protection devices at the bottom of the tower to ground. Do I also have to have the same devices at that end
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00828.html (7,736 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu