Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kc9cdt@aol.com: 561 ]

Total 561 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:59:40 EST
Bill, Thanks you very much for that hard work. Now that sounds like a filter I need both for SSB (mostly) and useful for CW as well!!!! 73, Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00722.html (7,448 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:31:11 EST
Bill, Yes, I found that out some time ago, as a matter of fact I beleive Grant told me that way back because I complained of the sound being 'Not Crisp'. Bill, Thanks for the reminder! Now I almost a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00727.html (7,605 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:33:15 EST
Grant, Have you e-mailed DitsnBits about this SUB RX bandpass issue. Or has anyone else?? I have not yet. 73, Lee, KC9CDT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00744.html (7,625 bytes)

244. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:34:40 EST
Grant, Thanks for sending it to them. You are the man, as you have all the details! Even though I'm sure they have their hands full, they will put it on the list.... Kind of beginning to remind me of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00754.html (8,150 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:42:42 EST
Well, I just checked the specs... It definetly says in the specification page that the audio output is designed for 16-32 ohm headphones. I have been using my standard 600 ohm AKG A-240 stereo phones
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00767.html (7,706 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:10:30 EST
Larry, Thanks, not bad, but brand new ones are $99.00 73, Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00794.html (8,147 bytes)

247. Re: [TenTec] TT Testing of V2 (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:15:10 EST
Once again... point proven...TT needs for someone to go there and assist them in setting up a comprehensive product test plan, including regression testing with ANY change. This plan should test all
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00795.html (6,680 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] Orion Sub Receiver BW (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:30:09 EST
I also like to listen to AM SW. If I am stuck with 3KC BW, I'm not going to be very happy with that. As far as I'm concerned it's a bug in the code. That's what they said the 20KHZ (and 6) filter was
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00813.html (8,285 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Headphones (Orion) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:54:26 EST
Stuart, Well, where do I start. I am using 600 ohm phones. Very good ones. If I put the audio gain to where it is comfortable with phones then unplug them... POW! very loud. Paul at TT told me the lo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00833.html (8,501 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] SW defined radios (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:13:19 EST
Hey guys... If a company is going to build firmware (software defined) radios they better have PLENTY of programmer development time and plenty of resource for testing/debugging the code! After all t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00853.html (6,673 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] Orion II NR with V2 (and probably OI V2.xxx) (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:26:14 EST
Just to ad a little of my experimentaion and observance... Maybe the distortion we are hearing is the noise, not the signal being distorted? When I listen to the OII with NR on what I hear that is mo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00913.html (8,063 bytes)

252. Re: [TenTec] eBay auction (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:29:17 EST
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00914.html (6,871 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:58:57 EST
That may be the way it used to work, As I remember 1.371 it was. The OII does not get 'VERY QUIET' anymore.... What has happened is TT rewrote it all (V2) and now things are not the same. IMHO most s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01011.html (7,379 bytes)

254. [TenTec] Fwd: Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:21:56 EST
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01012.html (6,762 bytes)

255. Re: [TenTec] OII Audio testing/optimization (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:31:10 EST
Ron, I guess I missed you last night.... I did hook up with another OII owner, Charles K5UA, and Ron N9AU on the side (coild not copy Ron). We did some extensive on air audio testing with my OII and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01062.html (8,406 bytes)

256. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:04:18 EST
Buck, Amen..... Is TT listening? I hope so..... 73, Lee, KC9CDT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01063.html (8,269 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:29:54 EST
Well, in answer to all this tech stuff on NR.... All I can tell you is: When I had an Orion with 1.371 I USED the NR !!! Now I hate the way it sounds, and I keep it OFF !!! Does anyone else feel that
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01065.html (8,501 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:34:55 EST
I have an OII so I can't do the trest here I am suggestiong. Someone with Orion please try this out... Start with Orion V1.371 find a band with some normal noise like 20 right now (during the day) Tu
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01068.html (7,180 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:18:25 EST
Grant, NOW you are talking,,, that's what we have been saying all along, (us nonengineers) It's broke! So, some of you guys with pull, (betatesters etc) Please help to get it back the way it was....
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01069.html (8,156 bytes)

260. Re: [TenTec] V2, TT where are we going? (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:53:10 EST
Is this rocket science??? All that needs to be done is for TT to take an OI with 1.371x, and an OII (And/or OI with V2), and compare the way the TX audio (especially SP, and EQ) and the DSP NR, NB, A
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01113.html (9,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu