Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ke1fo@arrl.net: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] A thought about contest reporting (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:10:10 -0500
I've always enjoyed reading the contest write ups on 3830 or my contest club e-mail list. I noticed that more often than not folks with big scores (and big stations) do write ups. That led me to star
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00119.html (13,538 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] EZ4EBL (score: 1)
Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:48:57 -0500
I've gone back and forth on this one. At first, I thought it was a rather innocent question as it was asked in terms of DXCC credit, not about the contest. But after I thought about it more, and read
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00173.html (9,887 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a deadline a deadline ? (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:23:45 -0500
Steve, If accepting late logs has no impact on getting the results on time, either the deadline should be later, or the results should come out earlier. Log deadlines are well known and posted with t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00179.html (8,961 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:27:58 -0400
Almost every contest has some rule that discourages participation, some more blatantly that others. CQWW CW and SSB definitely favor certain geographic areas, while CQWW RTTY puts the twist in of hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00190.html (11,930 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Writelog still in business?? (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:55:34 -0400
Every time I've renewed my WL registration, my new code has gone into my junk mail folder. Check your spam filtering to make sure it was not caught there. 73 de Al, KE1FO -- Visit my amateur radio co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00028.html (9,109 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Supplements (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:55:17 -0400
Hello everyone, I want to echo Bob's original comments. I work in the human services field, and part of our job is to provide medical oversight for the consumers my agency serves. The state regulatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00196.html (15,256 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Watch your dits this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:36:58 -0500
I do, and over the last 10 years, I've noticed I make a lot less of these mistakes as I copy more CW. See you this weekend! 73 de Al, KE1FO -- Check out my Amateur Radio Contesting blog at ke1fo.word
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00497.html (11,341 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] "shuttle jog" devices for rig control (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:24:03 -0500
Hello everyone, I'm considering a "shuttle jog" device to use with Writelog and my K3 so I can put the most used rig controls closer to the keyboard (tuning dial, filter settings, etc). I see 3 diffe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00388.html (8,374 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CQ CONTEST COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:48:13 -0500
Really? added by me: World SO 25,646,796 10,253 176 692 World SOA 14,979,055 8,114 137 500 % Difference -42% -21% -22% -28% OC SO 11,894,730 7,473 170 392 OC SOA 7,619,776 5,156 151 385 % Difference
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00232.html (9,849 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] AN OPEN LETTER TO THE CQ CONTEST COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:10:48 -0500
Bill, Again, really? I'm not buying it in either theory, or looking at the mult totals. For a top SOSB entrant, I would expect to see totals similar to a MM because just like a MM, a SOSB entrant can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00253.html (12,163 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rookie Contest (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:21:40 -0500
I think the instant logging is an attempt to keep it as simple as possible. Think about how complex contest logging software is. A simple web form is much easier for somebody just trying out contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00099.html (14,770 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:02:09 -0400
There seems to be this general sense that if you've got a list of stations that have been spotted (skimmed), you just click and hit the fkey that sends your call and you're done. Even if I narrow spo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00155.html (14,271 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] What are YOU doing this summer in preparation for next year's DX contest season? (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:17:20 -0400
Having looked at my Sweepstakes CW scoring report, I need to focus on better CW copying skills, especially with number groups - I often make a mistake on the middle numbers of a group of 3 or more nu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00288.html (10,840 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field (score: 1)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:17:34 -0500
I've long thought that being able to identify other "stations like mine" to compare contest scores would be wonderful. For a while the World Contest Station Database was maintained by Pete Smith, N4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00136.html (10,581 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu