Mail Archive Search: <+from:ke1fo@contesting.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ke1fo@contesting.com: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Safe crank up work? (was: Crank-up mishap) (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:32:20 +0000; I use an extention ladder while the tower is "fully retracted". I lower the tower as far as the limit switch will allow, then I place the ladder on the lowest section, and never on any of the higher; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00273.html (9,653 bytes)
22. Crankup safety (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 18:45:06 +0000; I use an extention ladder while the tower is "fully retracted". I lower the tower as far as the limit switch will allow, then I place the ladder on the lowest section, and never on any of the higher; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00276.html (8,972 bytes)
23. Tangled cables on crankup!!! (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 17:35:33 +0000; Anybody out there have recommendations for keeping cables on a crankup tower from tangling in the wind? On my US Tower TX-472 (which I keep down unless I'm using it) the cables get all tangled up in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00250.html (7,060 bytes)
24. Coax Antenna question (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 00:23:44 +0000; Someone wrote and was qoted in a summary: In response to your request for a 'QUICKIE 160 ANTENNA' let me point you to an article in the August 1984 CQ..... It is the W4TWW Coaxial Inverted "L"......; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00556.html (7,342 bytes)
25. Tower Ratings - Stupid Question (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 17:31:56 +0000; And US Tower sent me away to a PE to find out what the rating would be at increased wind speed, they do not even have those numbers. I would think so. As before, the answer to this question according; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00344.html (8,990 bytes)
26. Tower Ratings - Stupid Question (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 19:04:04 +0000; Just had a local amateur here have his "guyed self suporting" tower com down. The recent heavy wet snow we had brought down a large (12+" diameter) branch that landed on one of his guy wires. The to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00396.html (9,630 bytes)
27. Grounding tower legs (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 23:31:58 +0000; There are other issues besides the size of the grounding wire, there is also the issue of dislike metal corrosion when you attach the copper wire to the galvanized leg. Check out http://www.polyphase; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00028.html (8,293 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]