Mail Archive Search: <+from:kelly@thejohnsons.ws>

Results:

References: [ +from:kelly@thejohnsons.ws: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Tough to solve TVI problem (score: 1): Author: kelly at thejohnsons.ws (kelly@thejohnsons.ws); Date: Fri Jun 6 12:19:56 2003; I've gotten several e-mails with various suggestions. Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I will keep experimenting. In response to requests for additional information, here it is for everyone to po; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00019.html (8,124 bytes)
2. [RFI] Another Noise Source (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:03:32 -0700 (PDT); For the past few weeks I have noticed a new noise source in the evenings. It sounds to me like modem packet bursts. The noise is fairly wideband and pulses (like a packet transmission) with additiona; /archives//html/RFI/2003-09/msg00022.html (6,984 bytes)
3. RE: [RFI] HF RFI From Toshiba 32A42A 32" Television (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:53:53 -0800 (PST); I've been warned numerous times that Sony is notorious for generating RFI. Needless to say, my next TV will not be a Sony. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contest; /archives//html/RFI/2003-10/msg00021.html (8,909 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] HF RFI From Toshiba 32A42A 32" Television (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:57:52 -0800 (PST); I had very similar noise from my Mitsubishi 35". The noise was S5 or S6 on twenty meters. It was broadband and sounded like typical line noise. I was able to eliminate it with about 5 or 6 ferrite be; /archives//html/RFI/2003-10/msg00022.html (10,738 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] HF RFI From Toshiba 32A42A 32" Television (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:45:08 -0800 (PST); I've been monitoring this e-mail reflector for the past 6 months or so. I've seen occasional discussions about problems with certain types of tv's, but does anyone know of a website or anything where; /archives//html/RFI/2003-10/msg00025.html (8,607 bytes)
6. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:24:09 -0800 (PST); One of the things people are always told in regards to RFI/TVI is to "keep your own home clean". I've tried for almost a year to eliminate the TVI my TV receives on 40 and 80 meters with as little as; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00013.html (9,118 bytes)
7. RE: [RFI] Formal RFI complaint to the FCC (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:29:44 -0800 (PST); And what technology might that be? I'm curious. I'm sure I'm not the only one around here looking for a quiet replacement for my 10 year old CRT. _______________________________________________ RFI m; /archives//html/RFI/2003-11/msg00028.html (8,616 bytes)
8. [RFI] Eliminating TVI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:45:11 -0800 (PST); While I have some spare time during the Christmas Holiday season I am going to try once again to eliminate my TVI problem. I have tried everything and nothing fixes it. I still think it is probably d; /archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00073.html (9,253 bytes)
9. Re: [RFI] Eliminating TVI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:25:55 -0800 (PST); Yes, I've been trying to fix this for most of this past year (off-and-on). As I said, the problem is in the color. I don't see any herringbones or any other visual distortion. I also hear no interfer; /archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00080.html (9,604 bytes)
10. Re: [RFI] Eliminating TVI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:36:12 -0800 (PST); Thanks for the advice, but that test proved to be inconclusive. The problem is that the primary symptom of the interference is that a color signal becomes somewhat black-and-white. I can see little h; /archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00097.html (9,023 bytes)
11. Re: [RFI] Eliminating TVI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 21:28:58 -0800 (PST); As I mentioned in an earlier e-mail, I already verified that I get interference when I disconnect the satellite set-top and VCR and ONLY play a DVD. I figured this was as good (or better) than a rabb; /archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00101.html (9,332 bytes)
12. Re: [RFI] Eliminating TVI (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:17:57 -0800 (PST); I will work on the power line filtering. Thanks for the advice. There is light at the end of the tunnel! Today, I did some experiments. I was able to reduce the interference by adding another toroid; /archives//html/RFI/2003-12/msg00105.html (9,823 bytes)
13. Re: [RFI] Response to news FCC okays BPL proposal (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:50:55 -0800 (PST); I somewhat agree with you, Cortland. The BPL proponents did not gain seem to gain ground here. Most hams are unhappy because hams didn't make a touchdown here and squash BPL completely. It will take; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00086.html (11,474 bytes)
14. Re: [RFI] Response to news FCC okays BPL proposal (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:42:57 -0800 (PST); expectation that many amateur radio operators will not complain because it is > their only option for high speed low cost internet access and VOIP in rural Anyone with half a brain knows that it won; /archives//html/RFI/2004-02/msg00088.html (8,049 bytes)
15. Re: [RFI] BPL and the BBC (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:27:48 -0800 (PST); I think it would be a mistake to assume that the FCC (or the US in general) cares a lot about international law (or ITU treaties). Why is the EU imposing sanctions on the US right now? Because the US; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00010.html (8,702 bytes)
16. Re: [RFI] BPL--FCC Proposed Rules//We Need to Respond (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:32:47 -0800 (PST); As I was rereading the NPRM today, I noticed something interesting that I haven't heard anyone else mention. -- Begin Quote -- Campus radio systems have been operating for over fifty years in the Uni; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00012.html (9,319 bytes)
17. [RFI] More BPL NPRM comments (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:06:51 -0800 (PST); Here is yet another tidbit from the NPRM: -- Begin Quote -- 21. Southern indicates that it is unaware of any reported cases of harmful interference from use of its Access BPL technology. The HomePlug; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00015.html (7,602 bytes)
18. RE: [RFI] re bpl qrm (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:24:56 -0800 (PST); Thanks, Ed, but this looks like a dead link. Did it work for anyone else? in/near _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00017.html (10,021 bytes)
19. [RFI] Portable Shortwave Antenna (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:57:13 -0800 (PST); I'm planning to do a little RFI checking soon. First, I plan to check out the RF environment around a home I am considering moving to. Second, I plan to check out the RFI from various TV's before I b; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00043.html (7,146 bytes)
20. Re: [RFI] Ominous comment from FCC Chair Powell (score: 1): Author: kelly@thejohnsons.ws; Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:35:11 -0800 (PST); Following this argument, why aren't we drilling for oil in Anwar? Why should a small minority of environmentalists be able to prevent the rest of the country from getting what it wants...in this case; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00049.html (8,734 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]