Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net: 666 ]

Total 666 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [TenTec] New hams (doesn't matter what generation) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:46:25 -1000
Hi Geoffrey, I'm glad you recognize that you are a special case. You are really missing out. One of the great joys of CW, for me and I'm sure others too, is to be in a QSO when that band is open and
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00001.html (11,767 bytes)

302. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuners...questions (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 18:43:19 -1000
Be careful! There are many products out there with model numbers which suggest certain power ratings, but the real ratings are much lower than the "model number implied power rating". A good example
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00033.html (9,831 bytes)

303. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuners...questions (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 09:49:21 -1000
I have heard of useing two pieces of coax to make balanced feeders in this manner before. I am sure that it can work, however I wonder what you lose when you do this. It seems to me that you would n
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00083.html (9,780 bytes)

304. Re: [TenTec] HRD and computer control for OMNI VI ver.3 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 19:17:45 -1000
I have both a model 301 remote knob and computer serial communications connected to the DB-25 connector on my Omni VI, and it works fine. I had to make a 'Y' adapter with three 25 pin D connectors. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00095.html (9,963 bytes)

305. Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut 509 (score: 1)
Author: "ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net" <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 00:47:54 +0000 (UTC)
"N" connectors, when properly installed have much less loss than so called "UHF" (PL259/SO239) type connectors. At HF the loss may not be much for a brand new, shiny PL259, and the extra care and exp
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00186.html (9,936 bytes)

306. Re: [TenTec] Lowest loss matching an antenna for my Argonaut 509 (score: 1)
Author: "ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net" <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 00:49:22 +0000 (UTC)
Oops, I just reread your message and see that you are advocating type "N".... _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00187.html (9,054 bytes)

307. [TenTec] Coax shields (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 16:12:15 -1000
I was once bench testing a brand new pair of 2 GHz radios. They were Motorola Starpoint radios, capable of carrying perhaps a couple of dozen 4 kHz mulitplex channels. The transmitters put out about
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00216.html (10,174 bytes)

308. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI S-Meter lighting (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 08:48:14 -1000
And sometimes they get replaced with higher voltage bulbs intentionally, to make them last longer. Mouser, Digikey, Allied and others who sell Chicago Miniature lamps, or similar brand, have a large
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00235.html (7,750 bytes)

309. [TenTec] Omni VI problems, need help (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:02:46 -1000
Hi all, I am having some difficulties with my Omni VI. The first noticed problem is low TX power, particularly on 160 meters. The power is near enough to 100 watts on 80, 40, 30, 20 meter bands that
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00280.html (8,848 bytes)

310. Re: [TenTec] Little more TVI 95% Shield (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:26:31 -1000
The one I visited in Grimeton, Sweden put out 250 kW 900 years! Wow! He must have been over 800 years old when he was designing HF alternators. DE N6KB ______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00329.html (8,691 bytes)

311. [TenTec] TVI (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 10:22:06 -1000
Hi all, I have not carefully read every post in the recent 95% coax shield/TVI discussion, so perhaps someone has already stated the following. Even so, perhaps it bears repeating. TVI causes can be
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00360.html (8,997 bytes)

312. Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:17:55 -1000
Too bad not all installations use good engineering practice. In my experience paging system transmitters we're the most likely ones to not use isolators or filter cavities. I guess the reason is tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00365.html (9,392 bytes)

313. Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 21:48:13 -1000
And if you do the math, you'll probably find that a watt of cell phone power a couple of inches from the body is a lot stronger RF field than many thousands of watts ten or twenty feet away. _______
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00394.html (8,623 bytes)

314. [TenTec] Omni VI problems, continued (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:46:44 -1000
Hi all, My Omni VI is not producing full power on all bands. I have not fixed it yet, though I am probably closer to understanding the problem than I was when I last posted to the reflector about it.
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00526.html (10,364 bytes)

315. [TenTec] Omni VI problems, continued (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:10:04 -1000
Hi all, Changing C19 on the XTAL OSC LO MIXER BOARD did not make any big change in the power output, and I can still hear a periodic "relocking" sound when on 30 meters (maybe on other bands too). By
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00594.html (9,250 bytes)

316. Re: [TenTec] Coax connectors (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:08:37 -1000
Hi Marinus, The male "UHF" connector is a PL-259 and the female is SO-239. At MF and HF they are fine if they are quality versions and are installed correctly and kept clean and dry. You see a lot of
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00629.html (9,196 bytes)

317. Re: [TenTec] Coax Connectors (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:19:40 -1000
BNC, TNC and N connectors are identical on the inside. That is, the center "hot lead" pin and the outer shield fingers are the same dimensions. You can plug a N male connector into a BNC female conn
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00654.html (9,863 bytes)

318. Re: [TenTec] Bazooka antenna.. More than you wanted to know! (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:08:30 -1000
Hi Steve, With some resistive losses in the cable, or lumped constants, the SWR improvement will be much "better" at the expense of inefficiency. Since SWR is easier to see on your meter than a few d
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00057.html (9,422 bytes)

319. Re: [TenTec] Bazooka antenna.. More than you wanted to know! (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:06:19 -1000
Hi Jim, A lower S meter reading, when only noise is present, could be an indication that the antenna actually somehow responds less to noise, while working equally well (compared to the other antenna
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00066.html (9,502 bytes)

320. Re: [TenTec] Bizuka antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:07:46 -1000
There is at least one email reflector I subscribe to that is so strictly moderated that it is almost useless. Many questions are posted and very few of the responses are posted. The person who asks t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00158.html (10,892 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu