Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net: 666 ]

Total 666 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] 9420 Problem (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 10:39:55 -1000
Hi Chris, The 9420 has five transformers. Four are for the 4 high current 12 VDC linear mode (not switching mode) regulated power supplies, and the fifth transformer is for a regulated supply that ru
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00076.html (9,088 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ on it's way (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:40:52 -1000
The reason I got started with Ten-Tec is that I had trouble with close (in frequency) strong signals while operating in 160 meter contests using a Kenwood TS-440. I did some studying about receivers
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00127.html (9,052 bytes)

43. [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 11:21:31 -1000
Hi all, I'm toying with the idea of getting a "non digital" rig. I'd like to have most of the capability of an Omni VI without any PLLs. Just crystals and a PTO. I don't care if it can operate in any
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00141.html (7,519 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:19:41 -1000
What does this mod do? Is it a mod to an audio or RF stage? What is the problem without the mod? DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00145.html (7,732 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:41:35 -1000
Most SSB capable transceivers, that can also transmit in AM mode, do so using the same balanced modulator that they use to produce DSB. When in SSB mode the DSB output of the balanced modulator is ru
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00196.html (9,835 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:22:26 -1000
Hi Joel, Given an equal noise power distribution across the whole 6 kHz, using a 3 kHz filter should cut the total received noise power in half. All of the TX power (both carrier and sideband) with S
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00198.html (9,995 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:07:23 -1000
Joel, Yes I see what you mean. Using the same amount of power in the remaining sideband as was in that sideband before would result in the same SNR. I wonder about doubling the power in one sideband
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00214.html (10,522 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:39:28 -1000
Do any of you know whether when running SSB-AM the carrier power has to be the same as it was for DSB-AM in order for a regular AM detector to demodulate the signal properly? Or when removing one sid
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00226.html (9,647 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] AM, was "Just noticed ..." (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:19:00 -1000
Yes both SSB and DSB suppressed carrier are modes defined by FCC and/or ITU standards. However DSB suppressed carrier mode, is not the same thing as adjusting the carrier level lower than 100 watts w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00248.html (14,727 bytes)

50. [TenTec] Omni VI XTAL OSC Adjustment (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:22:50 -1000
My Omni VI has recently started to have a slight warble in both TX and RX frequency when on 30 meters. About the only thing unique to 30 meters that would affect the frequency stability is the band s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00310.html (8,632 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI XTAL OSC Adjustment (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:32:57 -1000
And also, where is that XTAL OSC board? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00311.html (7,094 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Using Airpax breaker (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:08:19 -1000
Specifications for both fuses and circuit breakers are probably available, which would include the amount of time that it take to transition from closed to open after an over current condition begins
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00348.html (13,695 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Using Airpax breaker (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:53:24 -1000
I would like to point out a few things about circuit breakers versus fuses. 1) I made no recommendation one way or the other. 2) I suggested that my intuitive sense that fuses may be faster is quite
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00362.html (10,406 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Opt 3: Problem on 15 and 10M band decoding (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:47:14 -1000
The band select lines in the Omni VI versions 1-3 take a rather complicated route through the radio, existing in several forms. In some places they are twelve parallel lines, one for each band includ
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00372.html (10,180 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] interesting eHam review (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:45:22 -1000
I'm not convinced the 7800 is worth it. I'm keeping my Omni VI, Titan 425, AND my wife. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00000.html (6,865 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI - Binding of main tuning knob (nota dragadjustment issue) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:47:03 -1000
That was an excellent post about replacing the Omni VI VFO encoder. If you want to find DeOxit contact cleaner, it is made by Caig Labs, not Craig Labs. DE N6KB ______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00001.html (7,030 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:37:28 -1000
Carl's explanation is a good one, except he lost track of his decimal places. 14.15015 is 150 Hz above 14.0150 kHz. 1500 Hz above 14.150 would be 14.151500 kHz. DE N6KB ______________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00035.html (7,998 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:16:00 -1000
I got it wrong too. Here is a revision: 14.15015 is 150 Hz above 14.015 MHz. 1500 Hz above 14.150 would be 14.1515 MHz. DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00059.html (7,704 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] OMNI6+ SSB transmit quality - HELP! (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:16:14 -1000
On the rare occasions that I have operated my Omni VI in SSB mode I have received excellent TX audio reports. I use a Ten-Tec 705 microphone, with the MIC gain control set at about 11:00 (40%). I spe
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00095.html (10,598 bytes)

60. [TenTec] Dual Receivers (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:33:22 -1000
Two identical phase locked receivers in a single box would be a first ( at least in the past decade or two ) and would be welcomed by low band operators wanting to use diversity/interferometry/phasin
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00131.html (7,111 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu