- 201. [TenTec] Finished....depends. (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:41:33 -1000
- I understand that Drake is finished with the R4, but a lot of hams are not. I understand that Yaesu is finished with most every radio after it leaves the factory, clicks or no. I understand that Ten-
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00415.html (6,611 bytes)
- 202. Re: [TenTec] VERY Interesting News... (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:27:40 -1000
- A JA manufacturer fixing known problems in a whole production run of a rig, instead of only one at a time only after the buyer complains? That really is news! ________________________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00565.html (6,980 bytes)
- 203. Re: [TenTec] E-Ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:37:02 -1000
- I know some of the older generation are vehemently against putting up with any little glitches etc. that are common in most computer defined electronics of ALL kinds today. Well, maybe I am one "of t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00594.html (8,781 bytes)
- 204. Re: [TenTec] E-Ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:56:54 -1000
- Hi Mike, There are many radios that have much better performance than the Drake 2b / 2BQ Heath DX-60 / HG-10, and do not get "stuck" and require rebooting or power cycling to start working again. So
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00610.html (9,383 bytes)
- 205. Re: [TenTec] E-ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:13:13 -1000
- It shouldn't have to be a choice between performance and reliability in the price ranges of today's radios. You should get BOTH, "Right out of the box". I'll go back to observing threads now. 73. Tod
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00694.html (9,352 bytes)
- 206. Re: [TenTec] Using a 253 Tuner in a Contest (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 09:30:13 -1000
- Hi Eric, I also have a 253 Autotuner. I have not yet interfaced it to my Omni VI. I don't have the cable to do so, and haven't taken the time yet to make one. I am not sure exactly how I will interfa
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00061.html (12,218 bytes)
- 207. Re: [TenTec] Using a 253 Tuner in a Contest (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 09:31:37 -1000
- Eric Rosenberg wrote: I've recently picked up a 253 Autotuner that I will be adding to my station, which consists of an Omni-6 Plus and Herc II (and 301 remote encoder). What is the difference betwee
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00062.html (7,811 bytes)
- 208. [TenTec] Re: Hercules versus Hercules II (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 10:40:10 -1000
- I guess I should have changed the subject line..... I wonder if the original Herc running on 48 V has better IMD, more output, or anything else good about it to offset the fact that you can't run it
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00067.html (8,302 bytes)
- 209. Re: [TenTec] 7.040 Audio Stream and New Rig! (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 19:03:58 -1000
- In center stage of the W8KC shack is a fairly-new Omni IV Option 3. Is that a Ten-Tec rig I have not heard much about, or are you a dislexic Roman? _______________________________________________ Ten
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00196.html (7,481 bytes)
- 210. Re: [TenTec] RE: Jupiter firmware (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 20:57:07 -1000
- I recall that the DSP engine in the Jupiter really is the same unit that was used in the Pegasus. I understood that the Pegasus and Jupiter are essentially the same radio, not just the same DSP engin
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00257.html (7,167 bytes)
- 211. Re: [TenTec] WTB...LDG tuner (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:36:06 -1000
- I built the 30 watt model from a kit. One of their techs told me it was good for 60 watts, and soon they upgraded its ratings to 50 watts, I believe. I have been running it at 100 watts without incid
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00293.html (7,479 bytes)
- 212. Re: [TenTec] Does TT list have Virus??? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:51:44 -1000
- Hi Dan and group, It happens to me too. I am not using AOL. I am using Verizon DSL. Hay guys, I noticed that when I send out mail to the TT list it goes through but I get the same mail returned to me
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00392.html (7,561 bytes)
- 213. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:37:44 -1000
- I have a Kenwood TS-440 which I have put a lot of operating hours on, and got a lot of enjoyment from. It is certainly not a top of the line rig in performance. Nevertheless I don't regret buying it
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00418.html (10,067 bytes)
- 214. [TenTec] DRM website a Nightmare (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:12:43 -1000
- The dream caused a seizure in my PC. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00420.html (7,890 bytes)
- 215. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:49:18 -1000
- Speaking of which, anyone have an idea as to why the '7800 transmit composite noise and rx phase noise is incredibly high? Since this rig is "Astonishing" and has "Phenominal performance" it is unnec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00545.html (9,064 bytes)
- 216. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:26:01 -1000
- Just took a look at the 7800 specs on ic-com's web site. In the transmitter spurious emissions it says "More than 60 dB" and even more spurious emissions than that on 50 MHz band. I have always been
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00552.html (8,423 bytes)
- 217. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:01:44 -1000
- Thanks to the "media" for using non legal time zone designators. This is why amateurs use (Z)ulu or GMT (Greenwich Mean Time). I applaud TenTec for using Z times only Once upon a time the ARRL used Z
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00572.html (8,239 bytes)
- 218. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:09:25 -1000
- But QSK (in my book) it did not have. Neither does the OMNI VI+! The Argonaut V does...and so does the Elecraft K1. If I hear a relay, I am always thinking if it is gonna click before I start sending
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00588.html (8,836 bytes)
- 219. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:51:49 -1000
- The Omni VI+ relay (not the external amp one) is plenty audible. Okay, I tried real hard, and yes I can hear the little reed relay in my Omni. I have to turn the receive audio down to zero, and then
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00627.html (8,993 bytes)
- 220. Re: [TenTec] Stupid Tech Question On Hookup Of Station (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:48:04 -1000
- Hi Dan, It is likely that it will not make a difference, however having the test gear between the transmitter and the impedance matching unit would be my preference. Here's why: When you have your im
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00740.html (9,011 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu