Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 532 ]

Total 532 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [TenTec] Centaur (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 16:43:40 -1000
don't use the Centaur much due to the fan noise. What mod. (size) Papst 57 CFM do you use? Would like to use the Centaur on ssb too. Taylor 572B's from RF Parts and replaced the original 100 CFM fan
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01014.html (8,364 bytes)

302. Re: [TenTec] RE 28.634 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:16:27 -1000
Hi Bob and group, What Uses Color Decoders A very good question, and you have explained it very well. Another good question is: What uses 3.5795454 crystals? The answer is: Many many things that need
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00198.html (8,419 bytes)

303. Re: [TenTec] Re; Adding 2.8 kHz filters to OMNI VI (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:26:07 -1000
Question: what are the practical effects of an "unbalanced" SSB signal? As Barry has noted, there is an enclosure with the 2.8 kHz filter that says the carrier "may have to be balanced." I haven't do
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00218.html (8,427 bytes)

304. Re: [TenTec] 2.8khz and Carrier Balance??? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:42:55 -1000
Steve N4LQ wrote: Would someone please explain to me what changing the filter from 2.4khz to 2.8khz has to do with carrier balance. I see no relation. The carrier is nulled by balancing the dc voltag
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00244.html (8,815 bytes)

305. [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:54:27 -1000
You guys have got me confused. "I notice that my used (new to me) Omni VI Plus upgraded to option 3" I thought that an option 3 upgrade was something that could be done to a non-plus version of an Om
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00282.html (7,802 bytes)

306. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:59:39 -1000
John L Merrill wrote: FWIW,I've had 2 Opt3 pass through me and neither one said OMNIVI Plus on them. Wow! That must have hurt! Did you swallow them whole, or one resistor at a time? _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00323.html (9,162 bytes)

307. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:35:59 -1000
Hi Jason, I understand why someone with a non plus or version 3 upgraded Omni VI would want the Inrad modification, in order to get another narrow 1st IF filter option. And I can also understand that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00467.html (7,840 bytes)

308. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:38:50 -1000
Hi Rick, Yes I understand where that Inrad mod puts the new roofing filter. I guess what I did not understand is that with only one NAR button on the Omni VI (non version 3 or Plus) you sort of have
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00492.html (11,754 bytes)

309. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:27:38 -1000
Hi Clark, Yea, I got it. With only one button to control it you would either get the new roofing filter AND the narrow option filter in line OR neither of them. Leaving the narrow option filter out a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00495.html (8,794 bytes)

310. Re: [TenTec] 9420 Power Supply Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:57:27 -1000
Hi Joe, The "Power On" pin of the four pin transceiver power connnector is pin 3. The "Power On" pin of the twelve pin amplifier power connnector is also pin number 3. When the 9420 is plugged in to
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00558.html (8,675 bytes)

311. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Omni V / 301 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:06:52 -1000
Looks like it might be a nice web site, but I'm not getting any of the images. The 301 wiring description is enough without the schematic image anyway. Still I'd like to see his station pictures. Is
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00564.html (7,764 bytes)

312. Re: [TenTec] Tricks for tuning weak signals? Omni6(opt3) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:30:06 -1000
Hi Tom, I also have an Omni VI and I love it. I also use only CW. I usually keep the LP audio filter set at 1000 Hz. Sometimes I tune around using the 1.8 kHz 2nd IF filter with the NAR (500 Hz in my
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00565.html (9,222 bytes)

313. Re: [TenTec] 9420 Power Supply Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:12:09 -1000
The transceiver "power on" is activated by connecting a load to this "power on" lead. The text does not say what they mean by a load, and it does not say just to ground it. I'll look at my Omni VI ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00575.html (8,640 bytes)

314. Re: [TenTec] 9420 Power Supply Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:44:22 -1000
The lables on my schematic for the 9420 show where the 3 non-ground wires of the transceiver connector go, to HI I, LO I and PWR ON. Putting a "load" (perhaps a short to ground) on the PWR ON lead wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00582.html (10,175 bytes)

315. Re: [TenTec] 9420 Power Supply Question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:25:35 -1000
Okay, now I get it. Any voltage about one PN junction forward breakdown lower than +REG will turn on Q1. So when turning the Omni VI on, zero volts will turn on the 9420. And when the 9420 is up, the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00596.html (11,290 bytes)

316. Re: [TenTec] Re: Paragon (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:07:44 -1000
Paragon II. I like it very much, especially its ability to do 60 meters. It has a number of upgrades from the Paragon I. If you have your choice and want to control by computer, use FM, and gain a nu
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00627.html (7,355 bytes)

317. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:29:43 -1000
Hi Jason, But to answer your question as to why I do not have any filters in the NAR slot it is primarily because every filter i've put in there has had more than 2 S-units of signal attenuation - I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00870.html (10,554 bytes)

318. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:43:17 -1000
Hi Jason, But to answer your question as to why I do not have any filters in the NAR slot it is primarily because every filter i've put in there has had more than 2 S-units of signal attenuation - I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00871.html (10,652 bytes)

319. Re: [TenTec] Models of OMNI V and VI (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:40:16 -1000
Hi Jim, I cannot tell you anything about the Omni V. I do have some information on the OmniVI. Here is what I understand are the various versions of Omni VI: 563 Omni VI = The basic Omni VI 563 Omni
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00973.html (9,062 bytes)

320. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI CI-V Address (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:36:33 -1000
1200 baud and C-Id is 04, according to my manual. Does anyone know what the default CI-V address and default serial baud rate is for the Omni VI is? DE N6KB __________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01045.html (8,146 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu