Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 532 ]

Total 532 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Pls CW hum (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:36:31 -1000
Jorge, Since you have made adjustments to PA circuitry, I am guessing that you hear this hum on your sidetone during transmit? Maybe it is a power supply problem. Perhaps the filter capacitors are go
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01059.html (8,184 bytes)

322. Re: [TenTec] Cheap Ferrites (was Orion reset) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:41:09 -1000
Is not the resistance dependant on the wire material (copper or other), cross section (gauge) and length, and not dependant on the core material? How can the core have an effect on resistance, other
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01063.html (9,717 bytes)

323. [TenTec] Omni VI Power output low (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:52:46 -1000
Hi all, I have an Omni VI. When first turned on the CW TX RF power output is nearly 100 watts, and then after being on for maybe an hour it is down to about 60 watts. I have not yet got inside to mak
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01144.html (7,527 bytes)

324. [TenTec] Inrad Omni VI roofing filter upgrade installation (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:43:08 -1000
Could someone please tell where to find pictures of this. It had been posted before, but I cannot seem to find it again. Thanks, Ken N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01151.html (6,671 bytes)

325. [TenTec] Fixed BFO freq = Fixed Beat Note (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:36:22 -1000
There has been a lot of discussion about Omni's 1st IF filters, and the CW audio note that we hear using them. I want to state the situation in a way that might help understand it. When we have a fil
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01185.html (9,289 bytes)

326. Re: [TenTec] Fixed BFO freq = Fixed Beat Note (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:59:31 -1000
Hi Chuck, But doesn't the "ST" (sidetone) adjustment on the OMNI VI also adjust the BFO frequency? No. There are only five adjustments to the BFO and they are trimmer capacitors for "alignment" and n
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00003.html (12,315 bytes)

327. Re: [TenTec] Re: Paragon 585 again (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:19:11 -1000
Hi Rick, In many (perhaps most) applications it is desirable to have the non selected coax switch positions grounded. There are also some applications in which you do not want the non selected positi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00159.html (7,821 bytes)

328. Re: [TenTec] 1000 Hz bandwidth filters? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:28:26 -1000
I'm interested, probably for the 9 MHz IF. DE N6KB The question of this post is to see if other Tentec fans would like to join in a special order from INRAD for a 1000 Hz bandwidth filter in either o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00193.html (7,750 bytes)

329. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Kenwood TS-2000 (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:07:46 -1000
There are a lot of performance reasons to choose the Omni-VI over the TS-2000 which no doubt others have already pointed out. In my opinion cosmetically the Omni-VI has it all over the TS-2000. I'm n
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00216.html (7,970 bytes)

330. Re: [TenTec] Inrad roofing filters for Omni VI, anyone using? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:11:15 -1000
I guess that you can only install either the CW or SSB roofer, but not both. The CW bandwidth seems about right, but I actually wish they would offer a 1000 Hz option, that would be perfect for S&P,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00217.html (7,953 bytes)

331. Re: [TenTec] Inrad roofing filters for Omni VI, anyone using? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:32:38 -1000
The Inrad web site does not specifically say whether the roofing filter kit puts the new roofing filter in instead of the stock 2 pole 15 kHz, or in addition to it. However one can surmise, based on
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00219.html (8,813 bytes)

332. [TenTec] Inrad Roofing filter board in Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:23:20 -1000
Hi Jason, Now that you have had the Inrad roofing filter modification in you Omni VI for a while, I wonder what are your impressions? I don't know what kind of operating you do, so you may not have n
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00269.html (8,415 bytes)

333. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:00:14 -1000
Omitting the resistors and substituting a quarter wave stub is not the same thing. In order for a Vee beam to be unidirectional, you have to terminate the ends in the characteristic impedance of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00459.html (9,368 bytes)

334. Re: [TenTec] Fw: OMNI SIX PLUS problem with carrier on SSB (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:08:44 -1000
Hi Bob, I have an Omni VI, not a Plus version. I'm pretty sure there is very little difference in their respective balanced modulators. The manual for it does not give a procedure for adjusting R3 an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00489.html (9,136 bytes)

335. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 roofing filter (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:27:55 -1000
Hi Jason, I have tried to send mail to you directly, off the reflector, and it bounces. I have questions about your experience with the Inrad roofing filter mod. Can you send me a message with an add
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00526.html (7,442 bytes)

336. [TenTec] Hercules II / 9420 high duty cycle (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:46:01 -1000
Hi all, I used my Hercules II and 9420 power supply in the ARRL DX contest this weekend. The amplifier worked great, never showing any signs of strain or overheating. The 9420 power supply got quite
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00554.html (7,703 bytes)

337. Re: [TenTec] Herc II and 9420 duty cycle (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:52:56 -1000
Hi Phil, Thanks for the suggestion. I see how the currents to the four PA modules is monitored by the voltage drop across the 0.015 ohm resistors on the DC Distribution Board, and then combined toget
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00564.html (8,506 bytes)

338. [TenTec] Herc II idling collector current adjustment (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:40:10 -1000
Thanks to all for the information. I have decided to open up the Hercules, check the individual power supply voltages (and hopefully not have to get into the 9420 to adjust them), measure the individ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00571.html (8,597 bytes)

339. Re: [TenTec] Herc II idling collector current adjustment (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:13:36 -1000
Thanks again Phil. The PA module idling currents were not high. With the amp not keyed they were all zero. And keyed with no drive, they were all around 0.4 to 0.5 Amp. I now have them adjusted to as
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00573.html (10,360 bytes)

340. Re: [TenTec] Herc II idling collector current adjustment (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:59:44 -1000
I only see a U1, U2 and U3, all LM358N. There is a non-zero DC input on the + input of U3, with the amp on and not keyed. So I think that the DC offset may be coming from U1 or U2. I would replace th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00577.html (9,368 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu