Mail Archive Search: <+from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Relays in *TX* array (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:13:28 -1000; Regarding contact spacing: DE N6KB _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband; /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00173.html (8,187 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: how to set up a Skype receiving beacon (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:39:38 -1000; I can see some utility in having "reverse beacons". I don't really care about cheating, as those who would cheat will always find a way. What concerns me is QRM, and the following suggestion I find s; /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00067.html (10,149 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Topband and the DX-Window (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:15:26 -1000; I think it is just an accident of history. With the 25 kHz regional segmentation of the band in the days of Loran it did not make sense to have CW and Fone subdivisions for each region. It was alrea; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00173.html (8,600 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:43:17 -1000; For a noise canceling unit to work, the noise antenna has to: 1) pick up the same noise that your main antenna is picking up that you are trying to cancel and 2) the power ratio and phase relation of; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00315.html (8,991 bytes)
5. Topband: Beverage above chain link fence (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:10:55 -1000; Hi all, Probably the only way I will ever have a Beverage antenna at this QTH is to run it along the top of a chain link fence. I understand that a Beverage really needs to have poor to mediocre grou; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00394.html (6,981 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Beverage resistor triming (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:11:18 -1000; The terminating resistor needs to be equal to the impedance of the Beverage antenna wire against the ground. The goal is to have signals traveling towards the terminating resistor completely absorbed; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00363.html (8,959 bytes)
7. Topband: Log Submission (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:47:09 -1000; Hi all, A couple of questions about my log submission: I used CT DOS IARU mode and am editing the log using word pad. The log submission robot can be very picky, so I want to get every detail right t; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00227.html (7,741 bytes)
8. Topband: QRP scoring in contests (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:12:20 -1000; In every contest I know of, which gives a higher multiplier for QRP operation, the QRP multiplier is an all or nothing deal. You cannot use your better judgment and switch on the PA to complete a QSO; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00131.html (7,634 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ? (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:15:09 -1000; Any comments? Yes, I do have a comment about QST reporting of the scores. QST has reduced their coverage of the 160 meter contest scores to show only the top ten in each catagory and then in their "R; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00034.html (8,455 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: WB4ENE - MRA (minimal reactance antenna) (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:45:50 -1000; This antenna may well fit some specific application with better efficiency than any other design. For instance an application that requires it can fit on a large truck, and be driven under bridges wi; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00243.html (7,820 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Tuning elevated radials (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:38:16 -1000; We could balance the radial currents by putting series resistances in them. Given the choice, I would rather have less resistance and higher current regardless of balance. Especially considering the; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00044.html (8,394 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Reversible Beverage (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:11:39 -1000; Hi Mike, I once built seven two wire Beverages at the Cuesta College Radio Club. I used the method explained by Misek in his book Beverage Antenna Handbook. I believe that several issues of the ARRL; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00036.html (8,611 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: phasing two verticals (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:47:28 -1000; In that case, even if you do get the currents equal in magnitude and in the correct phase relative to each other at the feed points, the current distribution over the whole of each vertical is not n; /archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00030.html (7,637 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: phasing two verticals (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:10:35 -1000; Hi, Regarding the following: Is the folloing true? If you can make the verticals identical, and the surrounding ground system the same for each vertical, and the effects of nearby objects negligible,; /archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00025.html (7,572 bytes)
15. Topband: QSLs in the mail (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:06:45 -1000; Hi all, QSLs for contest QSOs with NH6KB went into the mail in SASEs today to the following stations: WA5VGI, AA6XV, K6UIZ, KA6UMQ, W6VFU, AC7PN, WA7FKV, K8NKQ, W8TE, K0SR, W0GG I'll try to be more p; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00140.html (6,286 bytes)
16. Topband: Radials (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:40:20 -1000; "If you have really good soil, you might get by with less. If it were me, I would go with 40 to 60 depending on how hard it is to put them down." In most cases, I would guess, the harder it is to put; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00118.html (6,383 bytes)
17. Topband: CQ Long Path (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:09:51 -1000; Hi all, I wonder why does anyone call "CQ LP"? I can understand calling "CQ DX". That generally means you don't want the guy down the street, or in the adjacent state, or in the same "DXCC entity" to; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00139.html (6,921 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Hi Contacts (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:27:53 -1000; Hi Gene, and anybody else who wants a KH6 QSO on topband, Yes I am in Hilo, on the big island (that is what we call the island of Hawaii here) I'll be glad to attempt a QSO with any mainland station.; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00065.html (7,293 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Elevated vs Buried Radials (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:23:55 -1000; Hi Gary, This is so typical of vertical/radial system performance comparison data. Of course more data is better, and I am glad this data has been published (even though I can't see it) I sure would; /archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00055.html (8,036 bytes)
20. Topband: 160 meter condx tonight (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:53:32 -1000; I'd like to thank all the operators who stuck with me and repeated their callsigns over and over and over tonight. The QRN is absolutely terrible in KH6 tonight. Signals from NA are very good, but th; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00326.html (6,546 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]