Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ki4yik@arrl.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: David Taylor <ki4yik@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:51:24 -0400
I may be new around to the contesting realm, but I don't see the need to berate anyone who stated an opinion. That being said, I don't think it is wrong to control a radio remotely. Your rig, still h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00102.html (12,901 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: David Taylor <ki4yik@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:49:17 -0400
And if my power source fails, or my radio fails, I am also off the air. Anything can fail and take us off the air so I am not sure how that makes any sense to argue that if the internet goes out, we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00184.html (14,509 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW (score: 1)
Author: David Taylor Jr <ki4yik@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:18:53 -0500
Now it is down to just minutes. Very well done! On 1/13/2013 12:06 AM, Bill Parry wrote: After all the negative comments about LOTW (I didn't say anything but I was irritated too), I think it is only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00079.html (7,422 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu