Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kim.ostman@tut.fi: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Audio and logs from OH4A online (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:17:05 +0200
Hi, Have you ever wondered what your signal sounds like in Aurora-ridden Finland? Now you can find out: I've uploaded logs and audio of my SO2R/SOSB contest efforts from OH6LI's station as OH4A since
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00227.html (7,149 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Contribute to the PileUP! magazine (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:28:58 +0300
Call for Contributions Your contesting magazine PileUP! is again breaking barriers and will publish a special theme issue on "Budget contesting" to go with the times. We welcome low-cost-contesting a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00068.html (7,617 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] WPX CW around Kansas City? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 19:07:20 +0300
Hi, I will be in Kansas City, MO, for a conference at the end of this month, leaving for home on the morning of Saturday 29th. If there is a single-op possibility or a multi-op effort in the general
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00011.html (7,099 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Scandinavian Activity Contest: Heat up the Polar Battle! (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:40:53 +0300
The Nordic Radio Amateur Union invites you to the 53rd Scandinavian Activity Contest (SAC), taking place as follows: CW: 17-18 September, 12 UTC - 12 UTC SSB: 8-9 October, 12 UTC - 12 UTC Full rules,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00002.html (8,197 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Reminder: Scandinavian Activity Contest, CW (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:36:24 +0300
Busy this weekend? Here's a good excuse to relax instead. Whether you were going to shovel snow, repair the surf board, or get a tan, get inside. Sunspots are at a C24 record, and who cares about a C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00112.html (7,177 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2011 SAC CW - All 3830 Claimed Scores 20Sep2011 (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:12:31 +0300
Dear Barry, Sorry to hear about the troubles that you've had with the log robot. We've done our best, but unavoidably some glitches always remain. It was a well "attended" SAC CW this time, and we're
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00176.html (10,388 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Final reminder: Submit your SAC CW logs at www.sactest.net (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 22:57:10 +0300
Dear all, Please submit your logs from the CW leg of the Scandinavian Activity Contest before 24:00 UTC tomorrow on Sunday, 2nd October. Click http://www.sactest.net and the "Upload contest log" butt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00010.html (7,268 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Record Number of SAC CW Logs -- Now Grab Your Microphones! (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:10:20 +0300
Dear all, This year's Scandinavian Activity Contest on CW was a great success, despite the poor propagation. Up to the deadline, over 1180 logs were submitted. This breaks the previous record number
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00024.html (8,463 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] SAC SSB log deadline / Sun 23 Oct, 2400 UTC (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:46:29 +0300
Hello all, The deadline for logs from the SSB part of this year's Scandinavian Activity Contest is Sunday 23 October, 2400 UTC. Please upload your log at http://www.sactest.net if you haven't already
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00289.html (7,081 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] SAC 2011 CW Results Ready (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:26:49 +0300
Hello all, The final results of the CW part of Scandinavian Activity Contest 2011 were delivered to the webmaster at http://www.sactest.net yesterday and should be uploaded shortly, together with a b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00300.html (7,514 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] SAC 2011 Logchecking Finished (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:21:14 +0200
Dear all, The logchecking of this year's Scandinavian Activity Contest SSB is now complete. The final results will be published on http://www.sactest.net in the next days, with the CW results having
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00051.html (8,091 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Status of getscores.org? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:20:56 +0300
Hi, "IMHO, the more contesters do real-time posting, the more fun the contest will be for all participants. I bet scores will go up, records will be broken, and the publishers will have more to write
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00250.html (8,835 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Realtime features from Radio Arcala in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:40:19 +0300
Dear all, In addition to being on the air, the Radio Arcala station network will be on-line in this weekend's CQWW SSB. In an effort to promote the social and spectator aspects of our sport, along wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00285.html (7,433 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Radio Arcala hits CQWW CW with open cards (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:12:51 +0200
Radio Arcala, a Finnish-based initiative for developing leading-egde Amateur Radio technology and concepts, has taken another advance initiative for the contest community to review. It is about viabi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00219.html (9,240 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:33:55 +0200
Hi, I just took the CQWW survey, and one question in particular sparked a further question: What is the origin and rationale for the CQWW rule where North American stations get 2 points for intra-con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00159.html (7,183 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] National Team Contesting trial in SAC CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:28:35 +0300
Hi, For the second year in a row, the Scandinavian Activity Contest is featuring a trial in "National Team Contesting," this weekend on CW (12z - 12z). This means that six top-tier entrants are selec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-09/msg00180.html (7,661 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:20:30 +0200
Dear all, Bob's N6BK / HS0ZIA e-mail to the reflector triggered some (long...) thoughts in my head. He wondered why North American (NA) stations in CQWW get 2 points for each NA QSO outside their own
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00389.html (13,130 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:10:33 +0200
Kelly, I think we all agree that the continental divides and the 1/3-point rule make it impossible for just anybody from anywhere to win. VE4 is probably even more disadvantaged than OH6 in terms of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00396.html (19,408 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:08:44 +0200
Dear Mike, I agree that leaving out AF was quite an oversight on my part, thanks for bringing it up. To see whether this really changes the situation I again looked at the numbers. There are 77 AF co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00401.html (9,994 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Towards a critical examination of the 2-point rule in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Kim Östman <kim.ostman@tut.fi>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:15:45 +0200
Gents, Taking into account the added analysis (thanks for the prompting critique, Mike W0MU) about the negligible effect of AF, is somebody on the reflector actually able to rebut in point-by-point f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00454.html (11,171 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu