Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kk7uv@bresnan.net: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: End Fed Twin Lead Marconi Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:12:36 -0700
I have a similar antenna. Mine is about 75 foot vertical wire with a 75 foot topwire, over a field of 60 radials that vary from 50 feet to 130 feet on a steep slope. My feedpoint Z measured 25 + j0 a
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00013.html (8,700 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Fwd: JD1BMM will be QRV soon. De JH2RMU (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:32:04 -0700
It has been a month now since JH2RMU announced it. Has anyone heard JD1BMM yet? Steve, KK7UV _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00018.html (7,190 bytes)

3. Topband: RF parts plate choke (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:34:31 -0700
I see lots of reference to the RF parts RFC-4L as a fine plate choke for use down thru 160m. Yet I do not see it offered on their website. Is their RFC-3 the same or at least suitable? I did ask them
/archives//html/Topband/2008-03/msg00019.html (7,120 bytes)

4. Topband: L-network coil size (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 19:00:14 -0600
I am designing an L-network for my 160 vertical which I would also like to put on 80 and 40m. I have figured out the component values for the 3 bands but would like to know how large the coils need t
/archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00039.html (7,172 bytes)

5. Topband: EU signals (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:25:19 -0700
For those of you in my region around MT (W7LR, N6TR, W7IUV, K7TJR, etc) who have little problem hearing DX, I am curious as to whether the signals from EU of the past several days have been arriving
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00033.html (7,030 bytes)

6. Topband: QEX article and T-vertical improvement (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:46:57 -0600
I currently have a wire T-vertical with a 75-ft. vertical portion and a 75-ft. topload wire over about 60 radials. Feedpoint is around 25 + j0 at 1.825 Mhz, which I match with a toroid 1:2 unun. The
/archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00075.html (7,788 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: RST original meanings ... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:48:49 -0700
The original RST scale seems needlessly overdetailed. Each R,S and T could be reduced to perhaps 3 subjective qualifiers with fewer ambiguous adjectives/adverbs. Readability 1 - Barely readable 2 - R
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00185.html (7,568 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Receive antenna pattern. (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:40:46 -0600
I don't think modeling will not tell you much at all about antenna pattern at ground level over real ground - which is essentially what your trying to measure empirically with your receiver and GPS s
/archives//html/Topband/2010-06/msg00006.html (8,806 bytes)

9. Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 08:54:36 -0600
I have a 73.5-ft. wire vertical over a decent field of radials (about 60 or so, 50 to 120 ft. long). I have configured this vertical two ways over the past several years and am wondering if they are
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00105.html (7,625 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Loss comparison between two antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 19:59:38 -0600
for your two antennas in detail. Both antennas were built over the same radial system, just at different times. (see my original message). I have 60 + radials of 14awg aluminum high-tensile electric
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00119.html (8,286 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: RX 4 SQ Phasing (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:55:19 -0600
You might look at your local soil surveys for better information, or contact your local NRCS office. I use the online Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm Once you se
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00178.html (8,411 bytes)

12. Topband: T8CC QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:29:41 -0600
Has anyone been able to get a card out of UA4CC for the T8CC operation last winter? I have tried direct mailing and followup email with no luck. Steve, KK7UV _________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00025.html (6,161 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: T8CC QSL (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:50:11 -0600
Thanks to all for the replies. Ark contacted me via email and is sending a card. My mailing was obviously lost and I may have originally used the wrong email to contact him. Steve KK7UV _____________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00030.html (6,971 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 3Y0IOF (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 17:03:13 -0700
Could you also please log in to the ON4KST topband chat so I can confirm my QSO with you there. You can see my callsign right there in case you only copied a partial. Otherwise I have to ask the othe
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00137.html (8,018 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Power Line Noise Direction Finding (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:05:15 -0700
I have a similar noise-finding arsenal Don. My VHF tool is a Moxon rectangle which has a very deep narrow null. I mounted it to a short section of broom handle so I can hold it overhead and turn the
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00029.html (7,823 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: RDF (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:44:41 -0700
A fairly similar design, although quite a bit larger dimension, appeared about 10-12 years ago on the hardcoredx website. It was 6 triangle loops arranged on a mast. Each loop 30 feet tall and 20 fe
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00210.html (8,048 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: inverted L issues (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:27:00 -0700
Water in the coax perhaps? Steve, KK7UV _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00276.html (6,441 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:42:39 -0600
Carriers here this morning are at 3500.85 khz 3501.58 khz 3503.16 khz Using nulls from my 8-direction K9AY loop, I put the signal between 135 and 150 degrees from DN36. If that helps at all, Steve, K
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00012.html (7,949 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 07:07:55 -0600
3501.6 is SE of me. 3500.9 is definitely NW of me and strongest of the three. Steve, KK7VU (DN36) _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00053.html (8,509 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 03:50:16 -0700
degree pennant Observing the same character here. With several daytime and nighttime readings, I can only best guess the following from DN36. 3500.845 is at 320 - 340 degrees 3501.580 is at 100 - 12
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00078.html (9,069 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu