Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 285 ]

Total 285 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [ForSale-Swap] More Antenna Analyzers (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:13:14 -0400
Ive been more than pleased with a MFJ 259B where it has mostly been used on 40-160M setting up vertical arrays and a HB 2/2 for 40M. It also was a help setting up Beverages. I dont need VNA accuracy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00265.html (12,765 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:50:39 -0400
The sign of a very insecure person with a high level of self doubt is when the most intelligent statement they can make is a personal attack. Thankfully, only a very tiny minority with that personali
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00458.html (13,302 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:19:19 -0400
-- Original Message -- From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> Sent:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00452.html (12,304 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:19:06 -0400
What you really mean is that on this reflector you have read something that happens to agree with your view while dismissing all others. What a great concept. If The ONLY determining factor is the fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00451.html (11,776 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Conductivity - Was:Re: Inverted L for 160meters (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:29:14 -0400
Has anybody ever wondered about those sweet spots while driving around and listening on the AM band? Im talking about those spots where the complete band comes alive and not just one station. No HV p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00447.html (13,000 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Galvanized grade 8 bolts (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:21:30 -0400
Since the thread starter was questioning what bolts to us on Rohn 65G tower the comment about crushing a tower leg irrelevant. The original question remains unanswered. Since I have some 65 clone sec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00446.html (14,897 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:07:58 -0400
A tree can be effective as an antenna also. It all depends upon what level of efficiency you are happy with. What you are talking about is called a ground plane and has been around since the 30's. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00445.html (11,536 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:57:45 -0400
That is a blanket statement that doesnt hold much water. Belrose and others have published also and believe that 12' is adequate on 160 in many cases. BC band engineers have proven that an elevated s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00423.html (10,328 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:14:05 -0400
With all due respect to the mechanical engineers, but is there a real need for an antenna of double the weight and probably 4 times the selling price of a Cushcraft? Up here in New England the CC see
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00409.html (9,482 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Where to buy some bolts for 65G tower? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:02:29 -0400
You can buy hardware in bulk at a fastener company, most of which have a walk in counter; a lot cheaper than a hardware store. Grade 8 is the best unless you want to get into mil-spec grades. Carl KM
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00406.html (7,935 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:06:31 -0400
Im sure you wouldnt fault your location or the sun spot cycle either. Other than that it only takes time and money Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00388.html (9,441 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:43:46 -0400
Given enough time and DX Cluster spots you could do it with QRP. I have over 200 on 40 with 5W but I still dont like the KLM. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: RICHARD SOLOMON To: jeremy-ca ; jo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00382.html (11,377 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty 40 (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:51:36 -0400
I had a pair of 4 el KLMs and was never overly impressed by their performance. Before that I had a Hi-Gain 2 el and it was often referred to as a rotary dummy load. One of my KLM's has been sold and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00379.html (9,349 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Figuring degrees of a coax line (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:41:14 -0400
If the exercise is simply to find that particular length then calculate at what frequency it is a 1/4 wave using the published velocity factor. Cut it a few percent longer. Then short one end and con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00371.html (9,696 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] How tall is that tower? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:18:11 -0400
I thought this this ancient thread died off over 2 months ago. If your idea works for you then use it. However I grew up as a teenager in the 50's with the ARRL Handbook and dimensions were in feet a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00259.html (8,782 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:03:16 -0400
2" at 432 MHz is almost .1 wavelength and becomes an impedence transformer as you already mentioned. If it is at the antenna end you would need a Smith chart or an asymetrical impedence transformer f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00245.html (11,083 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:18:36 -0400
Several published tests show a good PL-259 coming to almost a perfect 50 Ohms at 222 MHz but exhibiting a bit under 2:1 at 432. While that VSWR wont bother a FM wanker or scanner its not good at QRO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00237.html (10,219 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Saturn6 + (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:10:55 -0400
I used a pair of Hilltopers to put VT on 6M SSB for the first time from the top of Mt. Equinox in 1961 and again in 63. A generator, 20A, HB TX and RX converter and a HQ-129X the first time; all of 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00236.html (9,492 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259's (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:36:46 -0400
If you redid that sequence without the flowery backround and better camera focus I might be able to view it. All it does now is make my eyes water! Give an old man a break. Carl KM1H Great point Stev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00224.html (12,532 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] VE3GK stacking drawing (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:44:20 -0400
At one sun peak I had a hard time running JA's with a 4 stack starting at 30' that could be selected as upper pair, lower pair and all four. Put a single fixed antenna at 20' and ran them for hours.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00190.html (11,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]


This search system is powered by Namazu