Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 288 ]

Total 288 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TowerTalk] masts with steps (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:10:06 -0400
The steps I have here came from Create in Japan back when Orion was their US distributor. They are made of rebar, about 3/4" and welded to a bracket and also a muffler clamp. All galvanized after wel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00866.html (11,119 bytes)

142. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/mast height above tower? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:41 -0400
1 inch. As long as no part of the antenna or mount scrapes the tower you are OK. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00879.html (8,385 bytes)

143. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:49:11 -0400
My take on the subject from many years of 80/160M operation at different locations is as follows: Superb to very good ground such as a salt water marsh, a fresh water swamp with plenty of dead vegata
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00880.html (12,480 bytes)

144. Re: [TowerTalk] minimum height (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:51:02 -0400
The 1" was somewhat tongue in cheek. However the 1' in order to clear a coax loop is somewhat arbitrary and not supported by actual needs. My home made boom to mast plates are 6" to 12" tall. With a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00894.html (10,294 bytes)

145. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:59:07 -0400
Frank has the good fortune of having decent ground conductivity, not all of us have that luxury. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00895.html (17,141 bytes)

146. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:07:11 -0400
I dont need to Google anything. I suggest that you do the reading on what happens to the near field elevation pattern as a function of ground resistance. If you need assistance consult with a broadca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00897.html (9,959 bytes)

147. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/mast height above tower? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:41:14 -0400
Depending upon the length of the mast and the arrays that are on it there is going to be some moderate to strong imbalance that will kick the mast out at the bottom when releasing the rotator clamps.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00902.html (10,257 bytes)

148. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:46:22 -0400
I dont remember the details from NEC, Dean Straw, N6BV, did the modeling when he lived in the next town. All I can say was that going elevated made a huge performance improvement. Carl KM1H _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00903.html (21,343 bytes)

149. Re: [TowerTalk] Stainless Clamps Needed (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:40:43 -0400
Have you tried Cushcraft? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00918.html (7,724 bytes)

150. Re: [TowerTalk] Stainless Clamps Needed (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:26:01 -0400
The plated clamps I bought in bulk directly from Dorman in 1983 were in the $.30 to .75 range from 1 1/4 to 3". The plating is still fair and no nasty rust, just light and still on the surface. I rem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00925.html (10,040 bytes)

151. Re: [TowerTalk] Why copper ground road and not stainless??? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:44:57 -0400
Electrical supply and CATV suppliers in some areas have sectional ground rods that can be stacked as needed. They came in 8' or 10' lengths when I last looked many years ago. Carl KM1H ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00932.html (8,614 bytes)

152. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite beads for common mode current (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:58:29 -0400
That is a 43 mix and a good choice; that is what I use on my 6M yagis. Six to eight is adequate. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00941.html (8,341 bytes)

153. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite beads for common mode current (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:05:03 -0400
It aint easy getting 5 turns of RG-213 thru a 2.4" OD dia toroid! The definitve tests for Fairite 43 Mix beads as a sleeve balun was done in the early 80's and published in Scuttlebut and most likely
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00946.html (10,890 bytes)

154. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite beads for common mode current (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:48:49 -0400
On higher HF and 6M simply winding all the turns in one direction adds a lot of capacitance which defeats the effectiveness. Using RG-142 or RG-303 has been popular for decades on these toroids. Wind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00952.html (13,950 bytes)

155. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite beads for common mode current (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:12:58 -0400
By going from the conventional to the crossover method I was able to get a G5RV to cooperate that I was using at the summer cottage decades ago. No amount of twidling of the conventional turns worked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00963.html (13,162 bytes)

156. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite beads for common mode current (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:15:54 -0400
My shop currently has a 8757A, 8753B and an assortment of SA's, sig gens, sweeper, NF meter, cal sets, etc. Older technology but more than adequate for my needs. Plus they show up at rather distress
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00966.html (10,348 bytes)

157. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding Standard (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:10:18 -0400
I see no reason why tinned stranded wire couldnt be used since the oxidation issue of bare copper is minimized. However 2/0 is ridiculous for ham towers, perhaps it is a typo in the regs and they mea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00969.html (10,126 bytes)

158. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite beads for common mode current (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:42:21 -0400
Until someone comes out with a VNA that does excellent work thru 24GHz for $1000 I'll have to rely on the old workhorse. Im very familiar with the 8510, used it and the other models I have for many
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00995.html (9,985 bytes)

159. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding Standard (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:32:07 -0400
What I find strange is that the prior NEC grounding codes were sufficient for decades upon decades. So why the sudden change? Do they qualify their reasoning? Is it via a "concensus" which is like tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01004.html (11,451 bytes)

160. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:46:00 -0400
Even side mounted near the top but upside down? Lots of commercial 2 way sticks are mounted that way sharing a common side arm. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01005.html (8,561 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu