Mail Archive Search: <+from:km1h@juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@juno.com: 316 ]

Total 316 documents matching your query.

201. TopBand: Slinky test results (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 13:16:30 EDT; On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 07:58:52 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: SNIP OK, then I now come up with a VP = .45 for the ones here. Since they work fine and do not require a preamp on 160-8; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00130.html (7,819 bytes)
202. TopBand: Rohn SSV as 160M antenna? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 14:10:38 EDT; On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 12:39:56 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <topband@contesting.com> This goes way back to the late 1920's; early 1930's when AM broadcasters were initially usi; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00131.html (8,609 bytes)
203. TopBand: Rohn 25 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 16:17:48 EDT; On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 15:37:58 EDT k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham) writes: Both of your assumptions above are correct Earl. I also started those tests (April-May 1984) with #12 for the gamma. Even wi; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00132.html (14,073 bytes)
204. TopBand: Slinky test results (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:19:38 EDT; On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 17:44:05 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <topband@contesting.com> That makes no sense if I go by your prior postings. Rather than waste my time in another ar; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00138.html (9,577 bytes)
205. TopBand: 5H activity (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:27:19 EDT; On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 16:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Larry Tyree <n6tr@teleport.com> writes: MANY calls do not exist in the FCC database that us mortals can access. That does not mean the call is bogus. Or vice; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00139.html (7,081 bytes)
206. TopBand: Baluns (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 17:19:37 EDT; I use an almost identical setup with a pair of verticals. I suspect that the problem is in your selection of ferrites. While the 73 mix is good for the purpose, the current handling capacity of those; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00157.html (9,427 bytes)
207. TopBand: FCC NPRM to Peempt Local Zoning for B/C Stations (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 09:27:46 EDT; Thought this might be of interest to a few 160 ops. 73....Carl KM1H The FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making on Aug 18th in which they proposed to peempt local zoning, land use, radio frequenc; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00163.html (7,996 bytes)
208. TopBand: Rectangular loop (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 10:00:26 EDT; On Wed, 27 Aug 1997 06:34:52 -0400 "Robert g. Flory" or 20 feet off the ground. Has this Six Pack ever been written up? If not, how would I and others obtain the details ? Tnx....Carl KM1H -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00169.html (7,149 bytes)
209. TopBand: Light Dimmer Noise (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 08:57:19 EDT; I have had good results bypassing dimmers with .1MF 600V Mylar caps right at the dimmer inside the wall box. There are 4 dimmers in this house and 3 were noisy. They are all the same brand and purcha; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00039.html (7,397 bytes)
210. TopBand: NI6T (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 13:56:16 EDT; On Wed, 9 Jul 1997 06:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Larry Tyree <n6tr@teleport.com> writes: If you think Gary's setup is strange today I can tell you stories when we were kids back on Long Island in 1957 or so.; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00043.html (6,901 bytes)
211. TopBand: TS940 CW filter performance?? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 09:09:15 EDT; Hi Mel, I own four TS-940's so here are a few comments. I have never tried just a single filter, but from your description it sounds like you just hit it lucky on the carrier oscillator slope. There; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00065.html (8,220 bytes)
212. TopBand: New antenna on loaded tower (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 16:50:09 EDT; NAH! If the tower stayed up it is not overloaded Tree. The nice thing about the KLM 40M yagis is that they are almost invisible electrically. Unless you ground the parasitic elements that is. The boo; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00085.html (10,332 bytes)
213. TopBand: New antenna on loaded tower (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:52:07 EDT; Fred, the John True articles in HRM will put you darn close. If you are looking for an Appliance Operator solution, I am afraid you have come to the wrong band. There are just too many variables and; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00092.html (10,801 bytes)
214. TopBand: Tower matching (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 19:12:31 EDT; On Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Larry Tyree <n6tr@teleport.com> writes: Change might to will. Color me somewhat old fashioned. Everyone and his dog wants to create a web page. I really dont; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00096.html (10,593 bytes)
215. TopBand: 160m shunt feeds (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 11:56:26 EDT; Although it obviously radiates Bill, I question the efficiency of a #12 wire 4' away from a large tower cross section. Do you have anything to show that this is a correct d1/d2 ratio and spacing? It; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00132.html (9,513 bytes)
216. TopBand: Shunt Feed (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:24:32 EDT; I was just cleaning up a pile of reading material in the Throne Room and came across the Fall 1991 Communications Quarterly. The article is 9 pages long and includes many graphs, pictures, etc. A lar; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00136.html (6,811 bytes)
217. TopBand: 160m shunt feeds (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:24:33 EDT; On Tue, 29 Jul 1997 23:27:07 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <topband@contesting.com> Perhaps I used the wrong word but we mostly agree here Tom. My concern was indeed with band; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00137.html (13,442 bytes)
218. TopBand: 160m shunt feeds (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 18:10:05 EDT; Not that I can notice Jay...which does not preclude the possibility. Even as a single antenna the performance over the Inv V was substantial. I have done absolutely nothing for "tuning". The phasing; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00139.html (9,454 bytes)
219. km1h: Re: TopBand: Slinky Beverage (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 17:54:36 EDT; As the originator of the Slinky Beverage some 10 years ago I will say it works very well indeed. It may not equal a 2 wave wire version on 160 but it does very well in a limited space. There were man; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00150.html (8,200 bytes)
220. TopBand: Slinky Beverage (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 18:07:20 EDT; On Thu, 31 Jul 1997 14:50:36 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: To: <topband@contesting.com> I doubt if anyone has ever tried to do it in 10' Tom.... As you VERY WELL know this subject; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00151.html (10,497 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]