Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@juno.com: 316 ]

Total 316 documents matching your query.

61. TopBand: Re: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 12:40:21 EST
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 10:09:07 -0700 Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account existing OK...confusion factor again! Would I not expect to see the maximum benefit in the first and second stage...6 to 12 and 12 t
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00428.html (7,822 bytes)

62. TopBand: Aki JA5DQH (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 12:47:46 EST
Aki, my private reply to you bounced. My sunrise is 1030 on April 1 1008 on April 15 I sure hope to work you. MANY still need H44 for a new one. 73 Carl KM1H _________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00429.html (6,799 bytes)

63. TopBand: More on Echoes, etc (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 21:40:31 EST
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:05:17 -0800 (PST) Robert Brown Bob, I have been asking around and have nothing to report...yet...on any unusual VHF event over the Alaska to South America coastal path. Perhaps
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00443.html (8,215 bytes)

64. TopBand: shunt-feeding towers and elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 21:40:30 EST
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 21:07:48 +0000 Andrew Williamson SNIP I am not familiar with peat...except in Sherlock Holmes tales! Isnt that just a mass of organic growth? In the US, the good topsoil and clay
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00444.html (9,978 bytes)

65. TopBand: From the bit bucket (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 09:52:49 EST
SNIP On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 22:20:23 -0900 (AKST) Dan Robbins <kl7y@alaska.net> writes: A good point Dan and another reason that it may be advantageous to know the wx conditions over both the sea paths.
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00456.html (8,963 bytes)

66. TopBand: Delta dimensions (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 09:47:38 EST
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998 17:54:26 -0500 (EST) Bill Tippett <btippett@CTC.Net> writes: It is ALL due to that great soil Bill! Have you run EZNEC to determine if the TOA was different between the two? There
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00468.html (8,060 bytes)

67. TopBand: From the bit bucket (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:47:01 EST
And those ducts are fairly well established year after year as high as 10GHz. The W6 to KH6 path is an example and it is almost predictable. Others exist along the East and West Coasts. Long establis
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00469.html (13,252 bytes)

68. TopBand: ROTAHR Radar (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 09:16:30 EST
There was an interesting DX Cluster post from AA1BU this AM about the 2-30MHz DoD radar testing in Virginia. It was certainly evident on 160 this AM. Perhaps someone can repost that to the Reflector.
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00483.html (7,223 bytes)

69. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:04:55 EST
Tom that agrees right on the nose with the ARRL Antenna Manual ( 17th Edition here) ground conductivity chart. Most of GA is rated at 4 mS/m on the chart wheras my QTH is listed as 1 mS/m. Would you
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00484.html (8,593 bytes)

70. TopBand: ROTAHR Radar (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 18:03:46 EST
Several have asked me for info but I have no way of transfering DX Cluster messages to this reflector. Also, the K1EA link was down for a few days so I suggest that those interested get in touch dire
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00500.html (7,111 bytes)

71. TopBand: Question YB0ARA/9 SUNRISE EFFECTS Question (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 11:47:41 EST
Speaking from strictly a VHF/UHF perspective this has been my experience Tom: The duct is most often preceded by or during weather conditions associated with storm fronts, extreme high atmospheric pr
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00521.html (12,378 bytes)

72. TopBand: Nye Viking Out of Range on 160 (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 17:38:52 EST
The NYE is only an L network tuner and has very limited range...particularly on 160M. A T network tuner may be a better choice in this instance. If you decide on home brew go for 400-500pf on the cap
/archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00245.html (8,263 bytes)

73. TopBand: cqww 160 (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 14:29:09 EST
Lars, you were consistently one of the loudest stations from MOST of Europe; not just Scandanavia. Plus you could hear very well also. I'm very interested in hearing your comments about the TS-870; w
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00020.html (8,244 bytes)

74. TopBand: Comment on slinky on 40 meters (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 1997 14:29:09 EST
Tnx for the comments Mel. I use mine regularly on 40 and 30M but sometimes a preamp helps on 30. On 40M they are used when rain/snow static wipes out the yagi. On Saturday I put up a new 5 Slinky Bev
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00021.html (10,261 bytes)

75. TopBand: SLINKY 160 METER VERTICALS (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 01:51:31 EST
On Mon, 1 Dec 1997 20:44:10 -0800 "Lane C. Zeitler" <km3g@cts.com> writes: Suggestion Lane: Take a few with you along with an Autek or some such device and then let us all know what you find. Serious
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00028.html (8,469 bytes)

76. TopBand: TS-870 Comments (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 01:51:33 EST
On Mon, 01 Dec 1997 22:14:42 +0100 Lars Harlin <lars.harlin@pocab.se> writes: Lars, thank you very much for your TS-870 comments. I had one here, on loan, during the CQWW SSB in 1995 and the operator
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00029.html (10,712 bytes)

77. TopBand: "Paul Kelley N1BUG" <mmss@agate.net>: Aurora Monitor TEST (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 12:06:47 EST
The following is a follow up on a previous mesage from Paul. His page is an excellent tool for Topband addicts also. 73 Carl KM1H -- Begin forwarded message -- From: "Paul Kelley N1BUG" <mmss@agate.n
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00040.html (8,552 bytes)

78. TopBand: "Baker, Donn B" <Donn.Baker@UNISYS.com>: Sunspots & Propagation (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 17:26:14 EST
Some more interesting stuff from the VHF group that may be of interest to Topbanders. The more I get involved with VHF, the more info I find that also pertains to 160M. I wonder how many others here
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00047.html (9,259 bytes)

79. TopBand: Re: [AMPS] TL922 and burned grid choke (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 10:54:33 EST
On Wed, 03 Dec 1997 12:44:29 +1300 Martin Ellis <jmellis@ihug.co.nz> writes: That would be a mistake Martin. In that amp the chokes make poor current limiters. In fact I would suggest even lower curr
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00063.html (8,918 bytes)

80. TopBand: : Important Note Re: Au Monitor TEST (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 14:45:59 EST
-- Begin forwarded message -- From: "Paul Kelley N1BUG" <mmss@agate.net> To: vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu Subject: Important Note Re: Au Monitor TEST To: <topband@contesting.com> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 07:21
/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00070.html (8,441 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu