Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@juno.com: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Big tower - big antenna (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:55:03 -0400
I aint no injuneer! You should put some anchor rods into the rock Pretty much planned on that Steve but the big questions are: Should I use the original pivot pin base or go to a mount based upon the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00497.html (11,078 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] BIG Tower/Antenna suggestions (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 15:39:34 -0400
I'm looking for some serious ideas and suggestions before I go to Dudley Tower Service for a price quote. The tower is very similar to Rohn 65, 20' sections and a 24" face. Triangle mounting plates w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00466.html (8,222 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] copper flashing (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:51:40 -0400
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 22:56:28 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: Try a scrap metal dealer. A place called Merrimac Metals in Nashua, NH often has rolls of copper at scrap prices. Not flas
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00434.html (8,526 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] KLM Balun (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 11:30:41 -0400
It appears that I will have to replace the 4:1 balun on my KLM 40M-4. Symptoms indicate the case is cracked since the VSWR goes way up when it rains. I have two questions: What is the most rugged 4:1
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00377.html (7,243 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:53:56 -0400
Eric, The DE mounting method would appear to be marginal for QRO or rain also. I've built many HF and VHF antennas and would not want to use the specified phenolic or G-10 in that application. In add
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00378.html (10,345 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Balun(s) Testing (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 12:10:31 -0400
It indeed uses a hairpin match, almost a clone of the HiGain 66 which has been described in several VHF pubs as a rather inefficient performer. Changing the DE to an all metal T Match as used by CC
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00345.html (8,836 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Tower windload with trees blocking (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:27:38 -0400
Hank, I'm a bit confused with that last paragraph. As a for instance I have 70-80' trees at my QTH. Just about anytime I climb the 180' tower I can start with almost dead calm at ground level all the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00346.html (10,122 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Guying questions (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 11:41:44 -0400
My neighbor has 150' of 45G with elevated guys due to a narrow and sloping lot. The anchors were H beams which have more strength than a I beam. He also purchased them and had cut to size at a scrap
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00260.html (9,426 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:12:53 -0400
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999 04:24:41 -0700 Tom Osborne <w7why@harborside.com> writes: It works up to a point and certainly worth a try. The problem is that in some soils all you wind up with is a big void 8'
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00236.html (10,717 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:10:09 -0400
On Fri, 09 Apr 1999 21:44:09 -0700 Tom Osborne <w7why@harborside.com> writes: My experience with them is they rust out faster than the rocker panels on a 49 Ford. I buy 5/8" x 8' rods from an industr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00215.html (11,012 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction - Murphy's in the details (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:33:01 -0400
Most are made by one source these days. I used one made in 1998. Only to those who dont care to find or hear the answer. IMO it is not the equipment that is in question either, rather the test fixtur
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00200.html (9,797 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:58:18 -0400
Reasoning?? Too fast a deteriation with copper clad maybe? 73 Carl KM1H ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00195.html (8,623 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction - the devil is in the details (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 18:04:28 -0400
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999 15:07:27 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: NO, I think I used some junk from MFJ for that old test. The Wavetek is a recent addition that works well. When I want to d
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00180.html (11,434 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction - the devil is in the details (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 12:41:39 -0400
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:22:05 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: How incorrect? My handy dandy hand held Wavetek LCR meter cant even read that low when I just tried to measure a few minute
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00166.html (11,003 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 12:45:27 -0400
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999 08:12:19 -0500 (CDT) Shane Dugas <shane@eatel.net> writes: If you use Phillystran go to the 1/4" EHS equivalent. Also dont expect that solid tower feel of real steel. Dont run it a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00150.html (9,908 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 12:34:38 -0400
Amen! Sometimes we hams are way too worried about a minor point. Or be absorbed. The crux of the matter is how much relative to the main Modeling is a powerful tool. However a model is only as good a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00148.html (11,686 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Tower Identification (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 11:11:43 -0400
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999 21:03:48 -0400 "Mills, Chuck" <millscl@msx.upmc.edu> writes: Bring a section to a Rohn dealer and have them identify it for you and maybe even confirm on their letterhead. If you c
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00146.html (10,162 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Using a Transit (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 11:06:23 -0400
Back around 1982 a few YCCC members pooled some cash and bought a Sears transit for under $300. It more than paid for itself over the years in peace of mind and ease of installation. Later as others
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00147.html (8,923 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:54:35 -0400
Bill, At the old QTH I used Phillystran ( upper 2 sets) on the 100' 20/15M tower and guy insulators every 28' on the 140' tower with another 15M stack plus a bunch of 10M. Never could notice any inte
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00127.html (10,607 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 vs 45 ? (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 01:29:10 -0400
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:51:23 -0400 "Dennis Shoaf" <dshoaf@Mondobaking.com> writes: Well I wont comment about published Rohn specs but I had a KLM 4el 40M and a 4el CC for 10M 10' above that on 140' of
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00114.html (10,250 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]

This search system is powered by Namazu