Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km3t@contesting.com: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] hola - test (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:47 2003
Cool! Can't wait for this to start getting active.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00069.html (6,259 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] New VHF Contest Reflector (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:48 2003
The proper way to subscribe is to not send an email to the whole list, but rather to go read this: <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting> 73, Dave KM3T
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00110.html (6,864 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Suggestions on Antenna Heights for 50 MHz (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:48 2003
Fred's right. The importance of the low (high angle) antenna can't be overemphasized. I was the 6m op at the K1TR/3 Blue Mountain operations (1990-1993 or 1994, can't remember) in Pennsylvania (FN20,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00120.html (8,782 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
I'm familiar with HSCW and WSJT but have personally not operated either mode. I look forward to trying both, from a technical and fun perspective. But, for contesting, I fall in the camp who believes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00180.html (9,811 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest CW (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:59 2003
There does seem to be an overwhelming amount of SSB operation. There ought to be a lot more CW operation, especially in the slower periods. I'm sure people would work more grids if they went to CW. A
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00555.html (7,650 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Pre-contest skeds (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:05 2003
Great topic, Kenneth. I have been active with a few large-scale multi-op VHF operations, namely K3MTK (the old W3BBS group), K1TR/1, K1TR/3, and W2SZ (once). I've also done some single-op VHF contes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00959.html (10,441 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Pre-contest skeds (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:05 2003
And obviously, something I forgot to mention, making skeds during the contest using other than amateur means is against the rules. -Dave
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00960.html (7,916 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Pre-contest skeds (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:06 2003
And that's very admirable. And really in the spirit of what contests were meant to be. And should be. Believe me, I'm no major champion of skeds. I've just seen skeds as both a competitive edge, whet
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00965.html (12,418 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Pre-contest skeds (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:06 2003
And this is exactly where some contesters (HF and VHF alike) lose QSOs. Just copy what you hear, and log it. If you don't hear it, don't log it. And if you decide to use a database, and that station
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00980.html (9,914 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] Pre-contest skeds (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:06 2003
That's what happens when 6m is wide open from Texas. :-) Not sure this is a valid or representative data point. That being said, there are many factors that go into a winning effort. Most of the read
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00993.html (9,702 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] DPR (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
Tom Take a chill pill. We just upgraded the Mailman software and it required a few changes to get the spam protection back in. I think I saw one piece of spam come through here today. I'm sure you a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01934.html (7,233 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest CW (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:59 2003
There does seem to be an overwhelming amount of SSB operation. There ought to be a lot more CW operation, especially in the slower periods. I'm sure people would work more grids if they went to CW. A
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-01/msg00107.html (7,646 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Sept Contest (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
I'm familiar with HSCW and WSJT but have personally not operated either mode. I look forward to trying both, from a technical and fun perspective. But, for contesting, I fall in the camp who believes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-09/msg00006.html (9,878 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] hola - test (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:47 2003
Cool! Can't wait for this to start getting active.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-07/msg00001.html (6,259 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] New VHF Contest Reflector (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:48 2003
The proper way to subscribe is to not send an email to the whole list, but rather to go read this: <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting> 73, Dave KM3T
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-07/msg00042.html (6,864 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] Re: Suggestions on Antenna Heights for 50 MHz (score: 1)
Author: km3t@contesting.com (Dave Pascoe KM3T)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:48 2003
Fred's right. The importance of the low (high angle) antenna can't be overemphasized. I was the 6m op at the K1TR/3 Blue Mountain operations (1990-1993 or 1994, can't remember) in Pennsylvania (FN20,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-07/msg00052.html (8,781 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu