- 1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing (score: 1)
- Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:49:43 -0800 (PST)
- Some of the CQWWCW 3830 posts and a few individuals on this forum certainly are forthcoming with their opinions about Skimmers and the contesters that admit to using them (by entering the assisted cl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00315.html (8,046 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] SS Sundays (score: 1)
- Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:03:04 -0800 (PST)
- Since the SS Sunday doldrums is again being talked about (!) just a thought: Why does SS have to start late Saturday afternoon and end late Sunday evening? The pool of casual entrants that would get
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00171.html (7,682 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] The continuum between unassisted and assisted (score: 1)
- Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
- All this discussion - SO1R or SO2R/2V, then pick: hand-turned-knob or SDR w/blips or SDR w/local skimmer or Cluster skimmer spots. This seems to confirm the need for 2 Single Operator categories of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00559.html (7,718 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] SO (A) in ARRL 10/160 (score: 1)
- Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:55:48 -0800 (PST)
- Maybe this was discussed here before, but someone needs to refresh my memory, why is there no SO (A) category in the two big upcoming ARRL contests ? _______________________________________________ C
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00308.html (7,299 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] NAQP (A) class (score: 1)
- Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:02:29 -0800 (PST)
- IMHO, there really should be an (A) class in NAQP! Skimmers are being used, many times yesterday I had groups of 3-5 stations call in absolutely zero-beat. What's the point in making (A) stations ent
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00046.html (6,777 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu