Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kr2q@optimum.net: 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

121. [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB DEADLINE IS HERE NOW! (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:20:28 +0000 (GMT)
Dec 1 is the official deadline to get your CQWW SSB logs in. Hurry up! de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00601.html (6,404 bytes)

122. [CQ-Contest] Great new tool to see SSB & CW 2009 cqww claimed scores (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:37:50 +0000 (GMT)
HI everybody. Valery,RW3GU asked me to post this LINK on his behalf. http://pileup.ru/cqww/ You just have to play around with it to see all of the great sorting power there. This is a compilation of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00007.html (7,309 bytes)

123. [CQ-Contest] CQWW 10 cw (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:53:49 +0000 (GMT)
Heh heh heh.... Well, despite being QRP, I did manage several DX qsos (south). But the real killer was that I had to PASS a local W2 to 10 in order to NOT miss a double mult (zone 5 and USA). Gosh! d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00008.html (6,425 bytes)

124. [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:38:51 +0000 (GMT)
I did not know about this. Even more, look at their home page: http://www.mmsn.org/ The petition "background" is amazing to me. I quote: "The Maritime Mobile Service Net (MMSN) operates on 14300.0 KH
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00044.html (7,711 bytes)

125. [CQ-Contest] MMSN - can anyone explain? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:55:11 +0000 (GMT)
1. How come these boats/ships are using ham radio? Aren't there rules and regs or at least guidelines in place to have radio communication equipment (or something) in case of an emergency? I'm hoping
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00090.html (7,315 bytes)

126. [CQ-Contest] new CQWW scoring rules (100% conjecture) (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:09:51 +0000 (GMT)
This topic is right up there with "cut numbers." :-) First, the current rules (points/mults) are well established. When someone chooses to go to a 2 point country instead of a 3 point country, they k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00153.html (8,621 bytes)

127. [CQ-Contest] "Fair" in sports (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:33:08 +0000 (GMT)
".... V47NT out performed EF8M and lost. How is this fair?" This is NOT to "pick" on Dave, but this is a great launching pad (sorry Dave). In Tennis, who wins - the one with with the most games or th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00178.html (7,360 bytes)

128. [CQ-Contest] GI0KOW vs EA8CMX point structure (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:46:26 +0000 (GMT)
Hi all... 1. I like the discussion 2. Anecdotal evidence is often just that: a singular occurrence or a story that sounds good but is without a real basis - or more likely, not what really what it is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00251.html (8,081 bytes)

129. [CQ-Contest] Favorite mode correlations (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:01:15 +0000 (GMT)
A number of the comments here are inferring that "Years experience" is a substitute for "age." Please keep in mind that you can have a 65 year old in any of the "years experience" categories. Don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00030.html (6,728 bytes)

130. [CQ-Contest] long-time contesters, favorite mode, and missing those old calls. (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:58:30 +0000 (GMT)
Yup...agree. This last CQWW CW, I almost fell out of my chair when I heard a T5 note and "XX" Nah...couldn't be. It wasn't. Boy, do I miss hearing FB8XX. No cluster, no packet, but boy, once he got t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00047.html (7,919 bytes)

131. [CQ-Contest] have YOU submitted ur CQWW CW log? tictictictictic (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:35:50 +0000 (GMT)
hurry hurry hurry!!!! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00178.html (6,447 bytes)

132. [CQ-Contest] XTREME category...a colossal BUST? (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:31:40 +0000 (GMT)
My 2 cents.... Most folks on this reflector and most (vast majority) of entrants are traditional contesters. They like contesting for their own, already established reasons: Competing to win, globall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00250.html (8,728 bytes)

133. [CQ-Contest] WPX online score database (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:53:32 +0000 (GMT)
The WPX on-line database for score look-ups is SO COOL! Not only can you see your past scores, but for some, you can even print your own certificate, right there on the spot. How cool is that! Yes, I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00280.html (7,412 bytes)

134. [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:08:16 +0000 (GMT)
As long they decode one signal at a time, I see no problem. As others have correctly stated, we need more ops, not less. This is ONLY encouraging more activity. There isn't a CW "decoder" alive that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00204.html (8,559 bytes)

135. [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:02:08 +0000 (GMT)
Whatever TECHNOLOGY that you use INSIDE your station during the contest period should be allowed in the "unassisted" category. This specifically would allow decoders, "panoramic scopes", LOCAL skimme
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00266.html (7,815 bytes)

136. [CQ-Contest] IARU and other contest dirty secrets (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 03:30:20 +0000 (GMT)
So now there is a survey....sigh. The problem is not the rules; it's not the contest. The problem is that some have lost the sense of what a competition is. The concept of EARNING a win has, on many
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00212.html (8,515 bytes)

137. [CQ-Contest] Cheerleaders and the impact (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:03:48 +0000 (GMT)
Being spotted (whether by many others or by a few or even one cheerleader) does indeed have a sizable impact on rate based on my many decades as a log checker in CQWW. It is totally obvious that the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00209.html (7,638 bytes)

138. [CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW SSB results on the web now (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:59:43 +0000 (GMT)
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/cqwwhome.html When I first learned of this, I thought it was an error, but now I hear that it is intentional. VFB! _______________________________________________ CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00392.html (6,565 bytes)

139. [CQ-Contest] no no no...it MUST be 579 (was 599) (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:28:05 +0000 (GMT)
Sorry folks...but ever try reading the RULES? IV. NUMBER EXCHANGE: Phone: RS report plus zone (i.e., 5705). CW: RST report plus zone (i.e., 57905). So we are all REQUIRED to send 5705 or 57905, irres
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00439.html (7,094 bytes)

140. [CQ-Contest] it's time to appreciate the difficulty of entering the assisted category (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
The following is an expression of my opinion and should not, in any way, be construed to be the position of any contest committee with which I may be associated (although it could be). There are lots
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00441.html (8,482 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu