Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kz8e@wt.net: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C31XR & XM-240 (score: 1)
Author: kz8e@wt.net (Earl Morse)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:26:35 -0500
I have a Cushcraft 402-CD right at the top of the tower and a KT34XA 12 feet above it on a 4130 moly mast. I put the 40 meter beam at the bottom because it is more likely to need service and to keep
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00399.html (9,411 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] computer noises on low bands (score: 1)
Author: kz8e@wt.net (Earl Morse)
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 01:09:53 -0500
Mike, My bet says it is power supply related, but either way you have to narrow down the exact source of the problem. Start with everything up and running. Power down printer, monitor, etc one at a t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00212.html (10,351 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Any harm in pressure washing a tower ? (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:54:29 -0700
Have at it. I bought my Rohn 45 as a used red/white painted broadcast antenna. I rented a commercial power washer to blast off the paint and clean up the few rusted chip spots prior to painting it wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00218.html (8,528 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 6M Transmission Line (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:39:40 -0700
LMR-600 is 50 ohms. Shouldn't be any problem. http://www.nr6ca.org/pdf/LMR600A.pdf If it were 75 ohms the simple answer would be that it would bump the VSWR of a matched 50 ohm system to 1.5:1. For t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00394.html (8,093 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] remote tuner Vs lumped constants (K8RI) (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 06:50:08 -0700
Try an AI1H broadband dipole. This has worked well for me on 80 meters. I operate mostly CW but it covers most of the phone bands also. It's shown here on page 9. http://vss.pl/lf/08.pdf It's discuss
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00472.html (8,574 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireless Internet RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:36:13 -0700
Brian, Selecting the right bead is only the small part of the problem. The more important part is knowing where to put the bead. You didn't describe the noise other than that it is occuring at lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00548.html (9,446 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] FIRST TOWER & 2ND FLOOR SHACK --HELP (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:59:51 -0700
It shouldn't matter where the line of demarcation is between open coax and the coax running through the conduit. Whether you run the conduit to the top of the tower and put your polyphasers at that p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00193.html (13,561 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] FIRST TOWER & 2ND FLOOR SHACK --HELP (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:14:53 -0700
Sure there are better places to put the polyphasers. My own are located where the coax penetrates from outside to inside the building. The point was that they need to be put at the "boundary" between
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00202.html (11,815 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:55:12 -0700
Getting to the first set of guys is always the hardest part of installing a pier pin installation. I tip up the first 20 feet (with the aid of a tractor bucket), tighten up the temporary guys (at 20
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00426.html (8,086 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G (Pier Base) (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:07:41 -0700
The pier base is supposed to have that little bit of give at the bottom so if the tower twists in the wind (real tall towers) it doesn't fatigue where twisting tower meets immoveable concrete. It's a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00461.html (8,490 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast steps (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:20:36 -0700
I also built steps for my mast when I built the tower. I haven't used them yet as I haven't needed to service the antennas above the tower yet. That's going to change soon as the top yagi is acting u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00462.html (8,510 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Cutting a dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 06:42:03 -0700
Definitely too many variables going on to make the calculation easy and straight forward. Effects of height above ground, the actual ground parameters, and whether it is in an inverted vee configurat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00078.html (9,969 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna ID (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:34:57 -0700
Those are the same insulators I have seen on the base of a Hy-Tower vertical. So could be a Hy-Gain. Could be a homebrew, but that coaxial balun housing looks commercial. Earl N8SS -- Message: 1 Date
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00279.html (8,491 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Reactance at end of feedline (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 06:01:05 -0700
Looks like everyone covered that you need to know the sign (capacitive/inductive) as well as the magnitude of the impedance. Here's a brief tutorial that shows what happens to an impedance as it is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00092.html (9,197 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] 80M Inverted V - CW and SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:32:43 -0700
Try the Coaxial Resonator Match (AI1H) dipole. It has the double dip you are looking for and covers almost the entire 80M band. It is essentially an electrically OCF dipole made with coaxial cable. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00264.html (9,108 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] CM chokes (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:54:40 -0800
The 31 material will give you more common mode impedance at the lower frequencies than the 43 material. Depending on the core size and how high in frequency you are going you might be able to get awa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00114.html (8,053 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] rigging for lifting a heavy mast? (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:21:34 -0800
I have always used a clove hitch with an extra turn ( http://www.realknots.com/knots/hitches.htm#mwvsl ) which I tie just above center of gravity on the mast to prevent tipping on the way up. Never
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00123.html (8,786 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, guy wire? (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:18:14 -0800
Tighten it the same way you would if you were stacking it. From the bottom up. It will be hard to straighten it if you tighten the top guys and then have to straighten out a bend in it at the lower g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00329.html (7,700 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Rust & paint (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:14:59 -0800
In the mid 90s I went in with a couple of guys and bought 400 feet of used Rohn 45 that had been an AM transmit antenna. It was painted red/orange and white. The paint was old enough that it was fad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00020.html (8,988 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1)
Author: "Earl Morse" <kz8e@wt.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 07:20:04 -0800
It is easy science and engineering to make the tower base infinitely large, the cable permanently greasy, the ground plane perfectly conductive, and the guy anchors infinitely stout. The real work c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00083.html (8,703 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu