Mail Archive Search: <+from:lane@glerl.noaa.gov>

Results:

References: [ +from:lane@glerl.noaa.gov: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] Just curious..... (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:12:49 -0000; Principally, the FT902 has the WARC bands. Also the tuning dial turns the "right" way (clockwise to increase frequency). There are many minor circuit differences. I've always liked those radios. Buil; /archives//html/Yaesu/2001-11/msg00065.html (6,941 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] [DXR] FT100 & other mic's warning (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 16:53:41 +0100; Another issue is the lack of headphone jack and the floppy pig tail antenna connectors. I don't particularly care for the active mic's in the ICOM gear but it's better than what's described here. Gue; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-05/msg00026.html (10,547 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] Re: FT-1000 Shop Manual (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 16:04:19 +0100; I'm curious as to why it's thought that the FT-1000 has IMD problems? I've had one since '92 that's been used in many a score contests. I've never hooked it up for a bench test (the QST report was gl; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-04/msg00035.html (19,898 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] 747 757 767 840 differences? (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:22:06 -0400; Most of the radios you mentioned used an older PLL synthesizer technology which resulted in significant phase noise and rather high noise floors. There is nothing wrong with them (The 757 was a marve; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-09/msg00038.html (9,302 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] Feedback on FT920 or FT847 for 6 meter use and backup rig to FT1000! (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:30:21 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0032_01BDC9C1.A7FBA580 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See the attached pointer for inform; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-08/msg00026.html (10,832 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] RE: FT-847 CAT Shortcomings. (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:14:36 -0400; I'm sure the CAT function in the FT-847 does what it was designed to do. It's just that it should have been designed to do more. The contest and logging software I have used (NA, CT and LogEQF) allow; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-06/msg00034.html (9,521 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] FT1000 and CW sidetone (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 04:01:34 -0400; Ploppy? Well anyway I have an FT-1000 of similar vintage and the sidetone is clean. I would suspect pathology rather than genetics. I agree the stepped CW offsets are a pain (personally I prefer 650; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-06/msg00046.html (8,687 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] Radios for sale (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 02:32:48 -0400; I thought I'd let the list have a crack at these before I take them to Dayton. 1) FT-920, with OEM CW filter and FM Board, just back from Yaesu for updates: $1550 shipped lower 48. 2) FT-901DM, with; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00012.html (6,971 bytes)
9. [Yaesu] Yaesu at Dayton '98 ? (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 20:44:55 -0400; I was very impressed with the FT-100. About the same footprint as the IC-706. 100W HF-50Mhz, 50W 2 Meters and 20 watts 440. Available late summer. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.ht; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00061.html (7,633 bytes)
10. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 20:50:27 -0400; My (and everyone else's) experience with the IC-211 was enough to cure me of ever wanting another ICOM. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00062.html (10,311 bytes)
11. [Yaesu] FT920 (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 01:50:55 -0400; In a forum like this problems and bugs are what your likely to hear. Perhaps the newer ICOM's are better but many of the older units I have owned have had serious problems. My most serious gripe (alt; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-05/msg00066.html (9,367 bytes)
12. [Yaesu] Yaesu FT-920 opinion please (score: 1): Author: lane@glerl.noaa.gov (John Lane); Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 20:20:14 -0400; I own both You'll gain: 6 Meters General Coverage Receiver Memory CW keyer DVK Memories Better receive performance You'll loose: Calibrator signal Audio output level Internal AC supply Simple operat; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-04/msg00053.html (8,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]