Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lejeuned@centurytel.net: 137 ]

Total 137 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TenTec] Orion Freezing (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:35:16 -0600
for a commercial used Lambda switching power supply that will easily handly 80 amps. I was fortunate to get one rated at 100 Amps for not much more than the price of an Astron linear that would hand
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00679.html (8,859 bytes)

22. RE: [TenTec] Remotely controlling my Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 03:23:27 -0600
I use Microsoft's Net Meeting (assuming you're using windows). Works OK, but setting the mic gain and volume control on both sides is a bear. Finally had to bring the laptop into the shack and adjust
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00031.html (8,627 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] VHF linear questions (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 18:06:50 -0600
N4PY with XP Pro runs fine here, controlling my Jupiter. been using it for 6 months +, and absolutely no problems. Great piece of software. Dave K5WNV questions: resolved with the seller,I have an ol
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00047.html (8,554 bytes)

24. RE: [TenTec] re: (TenTec) Orion ALC (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 19:36:45 -0600
Actually, not - the Herc II (a transistorized AMP) uses no ALC - but does have lots of protection, including over-voltage and over-current lockout, and an automatically switched input pad to protect
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00241.html (8,051 bytes)

25. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:26:56 -0600
It "appears biased" only because it's a TenTec reflector - Even though there are comparisons, most of the folks on here have chosen TenTec. Little suprise that every recommendation is TenTec. Mine wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00717.html (11,283 bytes)

26. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:12:43 -0600
I bought the Jupiter because I wanted to experiment with a radio that allowed me to practice my trade (hack software). It filled the bill. Love it. And honestly, there are very very few times when th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00727.html (9,909 bytes)

27. RE: [TenTec] Basic question - Long (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 07:26:06 -0500
Actually - not - I attended the first Altair World convention in Jan 1978. Had lunch with Bill Gates - Apple 1 was not yet available. Altair 8800 was actually first commercially available microcomput
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00055.html (10,656 bytes)

28. RE: [TenTec] Basic question - Long (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 07:26:06 -0500
Actually, some of us do - from scratch! Dave K5WNV Golly Gee! You built your own computer??? Really??? You went to the beach, brought home a bucket of sand and made your own chips? Mined and smelted
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00056.html (13,152 bytes)

29. RE: [TenTec] Basic question - Long (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:41:54 -0500
Actually, I built it from discreet components (transistors for you youngsters!). not much memory, and not very fast, and only machine language (0's and 1's) for programming purposes, but it worked! D
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00058.html (15,988 bytes)

30. RE: [TenTec] Basic question - Long (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:23:18 -0500
Nope - The first Altair had no OS - just the 4K and 8K basic - it had all the IO built into the basic interpreter, including later 8" floppy drivers - I know, cause I had to disassemble part of it to
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00063.html (12,588 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Orion prize? (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:07:59 -0500
I have the Jupiter and the OMNI VI+. The Jup is a great little transceiver, and I really like the filtering, but for weak signal performance overall, hard to beat the OMNI VI+. Haven't been able to c
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00276.html (8,473 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] RF (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:09:30 -0500
Strongly recommend an isolation transformers (Radio Shack 500-500 ohm) between the computer and the OMNI VI+ in both the mic and spkr/headphone lines. Only way I was able to rid myself of both audio
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00323.html (8,221 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:15:00 -0500
Well, now In the early days of ham radio we learned to build 'hardware' receivers and transmitters from scratch - why not learn to program software defined radios from scratch? Then we wouldn't have
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00619.html (11,163 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec]software vs. hdw. etc. (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:34:59 -0500
nah - ain't that dumb. Just using software and software development tools like we used old parts from TV sets - building blocks. No matter what anyone says, I believe most competent 'amateurs' can le
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00645.html (15,935 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Re: Open Source (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:43:25 -0500
Wow, sounds like the guy that said these horseless carriages were a passing fancy! Dave K5WNV how one can be a 'futuristic thinker' if they don't know anything about the past? Maybe instead of being
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00652.html (10,404 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Why N1MM does not support the Tentec file interface (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 06:38:04 -0500
That would be a neat idea, Carl. Would complement some of the stuff I've been working on in terms of remote access. Your memory resident interface works fine, but is a bit slow, for what I want to do
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00003.html (11,131 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI "sport serial port" (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:14:47 -0500
If you mean the serial port that uses a 1/8" jack, I'm using the ICOM CV-1 interface adapter - works fine @ 19.2kbs Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Ed" <w3nr@comcast.net> To: "Tentec" <tentec@cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00127.html (8,572 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI "sport serial port" (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:29:38 -0500
Carl: Is there any advantage to using the DB25 instead of the Icom port? I'm also using the DB25 port to control my Herc II, but there is a Y so it's available for other purposes also, I assume. Dave
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00129.html (10,032 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI "sport serial port" (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:57:11 -0500
I bought it from HRO along with an ICOM IC-821. It's a standard ICOM accessory, I think. Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Ed" <w3nr@comcast.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, October
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00136.html (10,568 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI "sport serial port" (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:00:48 -0500
Just read the review on the K1NU interface - as I remember, this is alot cheaper than the ICOM interface. Only difference is the ICOM interface allows you to interface to up to 4 ICOM receivers/tranc
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00137.html (10,819 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu