Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 528 ]

Total 528 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:09:53 -0400
I would disagree with you there. Coax lengths that are an odd multiple of a quarter wave are the worst lengths for common mode problems in the shack as they place the shack at a voltage maximum. Prop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00406.html (8,997 bytes)

142. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:25:13 -0400
That, of course, is the problem. Even if the "entry window" at ground level includes a single drive ground rod, the coax may not be even qualify as poorly grounded for RF resulting in a significant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00409.html (12,489 bytes)

143. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:51:22 -0400
While common mode current may be a bit of a misnomer, it is accurate in that the effect of "outer shield current" is identical to that of common mode current in a balanced system because of the "pin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00419.html (9,943 bytes)

144. Re: [TowerTalk] HAM GATHERING SIGNATURES ON PETITION TO VOID ANTENNA PROHIBITIONS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:50:23 -0400
No, you will find the FCC's ruling on OTARD (over the air receiving device - e.g. satellite and TV antennas) applies to private contracts including HOAs, rental contracts, and builder imposed deed li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00492.html (9,520 bytes)

145. Re: [TowerTalk] 6 meter antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 21:22:25 -0400
Bill, Don't pay any attention to the elevation statistics for 6 meters from HFTA. In a private e-mail exchange with Dean some time ago, he pointed out that there are no elevation statistics in the pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00091.html (9,397 bytes)

146. Re: [TowerTalk] Temp mast pics. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:32:13 -0400
I disagree - don't burden my mailbox with bloated HTML e-mail, graphics and attachments. If you need to post pictures, put them on your web site and include a link. Still, I do not believe the softwa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00201.html (12,773 bytes)

147. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:00:15 -0400
RCS-10 uses a "binary tree" arrangement of relays. You will probably find the input relay has been arced so that both the normally open and the normally closed contacts are connected at the same tim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00039.html (10,531 bytes)

148. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 questions (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 08:40:15 -0400
The RCS-10 does not use double pole relays - at least according to the schematic in the Instruction Manual. It uses seven SPDT relays connected with four, two and one coils connected to the A. B and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00046.html (10,685 bytes)

149. Re: [TowerTalk] Sources of Coax Relays (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:02:21 -0400
Not if the overall switch is designed properly. If the switch is based on two relays per antenna and unused antennas "float" relay capacitance will cause coupling problems. However, if the switch use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-07/msg00126.html (12,594 bytes)

150. Re: [TowerTalk] Thoughts on a Grounding System for my new tower (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:22:55 -0400
1) I would run the coax and the ground/power via the same route even though they would be in separate conduits. 2) I would not bury steel conduit ... it will most likely rust in short order. Use PVC
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00012.html (11,678 bytes)

151. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 Sq array Dx or Hi Z (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 20:36:13 -0400
Absolutely not ... study "crossfire phasing" (W8JI term) or look for information on frequency independent phasing. For receive operation flipping phase of alternate elements allows phasing to work ac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00093.html (8,916 bytes)

152. Re: [TowerTalk] Example of typical gov waste (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:18:15 -0400
Jim, It's a company that BOUGHT stuff from the government and is reselling it. No, this is the government that is requiring "demilitarization" - total destruction of the trailer mounted towers. Note
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00190.html (10,320 bytes)

153. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Antenna spacing on mast (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 09:14:03 -0400
running this problem through a mast calculator program shows a wind survival of 93 mph with the following assumptions: That also assumes no ice. Add even 1/4" to 1/2" of ice and the wind survival dro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00266.html (12,150 bytes)

154. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Antenna spacing on mast (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:54:34 -0400
You were not only lucky, you were exceptionally lucky. 73, ... Joe, W4TV Mine lasted over 30 years!!!!! running this problem through a mast calculator program shows a wind survival of 93 mph with the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00269.html (18,132 bytes)

155. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:00:01 -0400
The person who asked the question has a KL7 callsign and the FCC database shows an address in Anchorage! Of course, current standards for towers require that most areas calculate windload and surviv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00270.html (8,635 bytes)

156. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: If you had a choice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:16:55 -0400
Based on the K7LXC/N0AX tribander tests, I'd take *anything* over a Mosley antenna - even a rotary dipole. 73, ... Joe, W4TV If you had a choice between antennas which would you choose a Mosley Pro 5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00240.html (7,708 bytes)

157. Re: [TowerTalk] If you had a choice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:33:11 -0400
near field measurements are full of problems also. besides the problems of projecting the near field pattern to something that is useful in comparing in the far field there are all the little distort
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00278.html (12,512 bytes)

158. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Testing (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:38:42 -0400
He tested several antennas against the quad, by visiting each test antenna owner's station, and reported how well each test antenna stacked up against his reference quad. The reference antenna was a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00285.html (12,088 bytes)

159. Re: [TowerTalk] bonding to AC power box or inside fuse panel? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:27:31 -0500
Not good practice in the US. Power supply ground (as opposed to neutral) and RF earth ground should be the same. Otherwise any lightning induced surge on one or the other will result in a voltage dif
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00232.html (10,340 bytes)

160. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower History Item... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:15:05 -0500
No - areal boom for fire fighting, yes. Notice the nozzle on the front end. Even then - before integral sprinkler systems - there was a need to deal with fires on the top floors of the "sky scrapers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00274.html (7,843 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu