Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lladerman@earthlink.net: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna recommendations appreciated (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:08:16 -0500
I am wrestling with what to get to replace my 15 year old KT34A, which has been an excellent antenna, but is getting long in the tooth. I'm also thinking about having 17M and 12M capabilities on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00434.html (7,572 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] 9913; Rotor loops (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:50:33 -0500
The string on 9913 has been very interesting. I have a major recabling project to do this summer, and am debating what coax to use for the runs to my tower (150 feet or so, 1HF, 1 6M, 1 2M beam). The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00543.html (7,735 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 9913; Rotor loops (score: 1)
Author: "lladerman@earthlink.net" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:42:39 -0400
Where do you find this "flooded heat shrink tubing." First I've heard of it. By the way, thanks to the persons who responded to my question. There is an amazing wealth of information being passed aro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00577.html (9,267 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 20:38:39 -0500
I have used it, with large rotor loops, and it's done well. My cable is over 15 years old now, and in need of replacement, which is no surprise. I do not use coax arms down the tower, I only use one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00104.html (8,940 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Using older rotor cable? (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 10:12:17 -0500
I'm refitting my rotor, and have rotor cable that's 18 years old but seems to work just fine. The "outside" run looks to be in good shape (a bit "dirty gray" in color, otherwise it appears sound), an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00598.html (7,961 bytes)

6. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] poor man's substitute for LMR-400? (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:47:13 -0500
I also noted the same seller has some "regular sized" (.405) cable available (black, 1000' spool): http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3704&item=5702721 421 Specs are here: http://
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00014.html (11,434 bytes)

7. RE: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 09:46:32 -0500
I had a Heights 64 foot crankup with an electric winch from 1980 through 1986 (pre-insolvency manufacture). The tower collapsed into itself when the steel rollers bound on the aluminum legs, and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00587.html (9,101 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Tri_ex Sky Needles (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:09:57 -0500
I have a Tri-Ex Sky Needle, a TM-358 (58'). it's a great tower. I would love to find a 70-footer (TM-370 or TM-370HD, which was the same size as the TM-390 (90') minus the top section, and quite rare
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00487.html (12,331 bytes)

9. RE: [TowerTalk] Tower/mast/antenna height -- a clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:31:19 -0500
The ordinance says that "This article shall not govern any tower, or the installation of any antenna: (i) That is under seventy (70) feet in height; and (ii) Is owned and operated by a federally-lice
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00672.html (11,229 bytes)

10. RE: [TowerTalk] Coax Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:44:28 -0500
I recabled my antennas (HF, 6 and 2M) recently with Davis RF Bury-Flex. Great stuff, it's flexible, tough jacket with good UV resistance, low loss, and easy to work with. Plus you can direct bury it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00154.html (9,186 bytes)

11. RE: [TowerTalk] Chicago Tribune news: Ham radio tower has the OKsignal (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:44:13 -0500
I would love Robertson's address, I would like to write him with the history of property values in my neighborhood over the last 16 years I've had my tower. Values are up 100-150%, which is just betw
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00555.html (18,496 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotors - your thoughts please (AlphaSpid Question). (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:55:49 -0600
Some reviews on eHam.com note noise issues with the AlphaSpid controller. Here are some quotes: NOISY - on 50MHz and on 144MHz !! Control box: yes, generates noise on HF (signal sometimes 9), but not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00886.html (9,018 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Selection Assistance (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:23:57 -0500
I've found the folks at SteppIR more than helpful. I had a motor failure shortly after installing my 3-EL. Mike, K7IR, spent aver an hour with me on the phone, and lots of email time afterward, runni
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00763.html (11,066 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Tashjian Towers (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:41:39 -0500
In addition to Tashjian, would also be curious to hear about US Tower experiences. I have been trying for over 5 weeks to get some wind loading calcs done by the engineer UST uses (not an employee, u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00022.html (8,208 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Tashjian Towers (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:38:01 -0500
The fellow is UST's retained engineer. When I asked UST about the wind load of my proposed antennas (not just 1 foot above the top of the tower, for which the towers are rated, but several stacked an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00029.html (10,617 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] distance between monobanders (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:14:25 -0500
Here's a good article that should help. http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/stacking/stacking2.htm Lou, WØFK Hi all, I have a 4-element 10 meter beam for my tower. I also want to put up a 6-meter beam, an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00093.html (7,971 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Interaction (score: 1)
Author: Lou Laderman <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:52:13 -0400 (EDT)
I sent this link in reply to another similar question a couple of days ago. http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/stacking/stacking2.htm Issue is not interference with the SteppIR from the VHF/UHF, but with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00166.html (8,322 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] SkyNeedle info (score: 1)
Author: "Lou Laderman" <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:08:07 -0500
Greg, what's the diameter of the tubing? The TM358 is 22'4" retracted, tube sizes 2-7/8", 4.5", 6-7/8". 58' extended. The TM370 retracted is 27'-3", so it what you have available sounds like a TM358.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00214.html (8,159 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing HG52SS (score: 1)
Author: Lou Laderman <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:15:46 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Absent an engineering analysis that what you're proposing will be adequate, and that the streeses from the guys won't compromise the structure, I wouldn't deviate from the manufacturere's engineered
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00267.html (8,846 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Tashjian towers (score: 1)
Author: Lou Laderman <lladerman@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:27:14 -0400 (EDT)
Tashjian's voicemail seems to be Karl's cell phone, and my experience has been that returning calls is low on Karl's totem pole. Emails can also be problematic. I suggest you call back several times
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00312.html (12,112 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu