Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lmecseri@cfl.rr.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: A35LT (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 06:18:40 -0400
So far no show. Lou KE1F 73 de Brian, KG8CO A35CO _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contestin
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00187.html (6,885 bytes)

2. Topband: RTTY on 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 20:42:51 -0500
Is there an officially designated frequency band for RTTY operation in the U.S.? 73 Lou KE1F _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00028.html (6,202 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: RTTY on 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:42:39 -0500
The reason I am asking that an experienced operator told me that RTTY mode is restricted bellow 1.810Mc There is no FCC rule and I can't find any "recommendation" such as the DX window anyplace. I am
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00033.html (8,376 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: That 1.9 MHz radar signal... (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:11:03 -0500
I am located in EL99, NE Florida. Using an inverted L. No radar signal on my P3. 73 Lou KE1F Mike va3mw On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Gary Smith <Gary@ka1j.com> wrote: FWIW, I've left the P3 on 1.
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00232.html (10,866 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: 160 Worked All States (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:32:15 -0500
...........and Lou, KE1F need one more state, WASHINGTON. Any top bander in Washington and using LOTW? 73 Lou KE1F I run an Elecraft K3/KPA500 into an Inverted L with a K2AV-designed FCP under it. Go
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00048.html (9,482 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:51:31 -0500
To us EP6T was European QSO Party. GL and 73 Lou KE1F Jeez how difficult can it be from the US, anybody with 100W and a wet noodle for an antenna can work it. On 80 I´m sure at least from the east co
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00153.html (10,554 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:14:27 -0500
Nermin, Lets wait for the final result from K1N. We do have EP6T data: 68,045 QSO 69.6% Europe 9.8% North America 17.6% Asia. I am willing to bet you a bottle of riesling, (Yellow Tail, my favored fe
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00163.html (12,151 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: [PVRC] AC line safety capacitors (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:53:00 -0500
Jim, As the result of such incidents, UL developed across line capacitor program to test capacitors for such applications. That program is under UL's component recognition system. Across the line cap
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00215.html (10,546 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Fw: Re: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:56:39 -0500
Luc, OK, lets wait and see. 73 Lou KE1F From: luc kerkhofs <luckerkhofs@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers To: "KE1F Lou" <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com> Date: Thursday, February 5, 2015, 5:2
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00216.html (10,331 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: RHR etc (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:59:20 -0500
Isn't this RHR is the extension of building your own radio versus buying it or renting it? I am 78 and considering to have my TX and antenna at my son's house and moving into a condo and operate remo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00357.html (8,096 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 07:42:00 -0400
All what is said is true. Dx also should listen on his own TX frequency and when they hear a carrier QSY +-1 and let the DQRM-er QRM an unused frequency. Just a suggestion. 73 Lou KE1F Usually a simp
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00063.html (21,305 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Use of remote receivers (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:45:54 -0400
During ARRL 100th celebration I was W1AW/4 on 160 meters. I was using a inverted "L" or more accurately a "1" antenna. I saw spots, "Can't hear", "No receiver" etc. A remote rx antenna would have all
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00107.html (9,051 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:11:20 -0400
Cheer up. "dumbed down" way is the only way to increase the number of available customers for QST and the hardware manufacturer's products. Enjoy it while you still can. 73 Lou KE1F On 7/11/2015 12:0
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00060.html (10,318 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: DXCC etc (score: 1)
Author: lmecseri <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:50:16 -0400
$$$$$$$$ KE1F Lou Sent on the new Sprint Network from my Samsung Galaxy S®4. By KE1F I just did a quick perusal of the current DXCC rules. If I understand them correctly: 1. Another ham can operate m
/archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00103.html (7,138 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Handheld Impedance Analyzer (score: 1)
Author: KE1F Lou <lmecseri@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:37:10 -0400
Is the lowest SWR is the resonant frequency? Resonant frequency is when Xl=Xc. When Xl=Xc is not necessarily the lowest SWR. 73 Lou KE1F On 3/27/2016 8:30 PM, Robert Harmon wrote: Maybe a dumb questi
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00240.html (11,372 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu