Mail Archive Search: <+from:lu5cw@qsl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:lu5cw@qsl.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL SSB ramblings (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Wed Mar 11 09:23:21 1998; a Well, c) should be the main reason, here is few people interested in answering to ANOTHER N9 Also, where did you call? For success with spanish calls you should try 28300-350 (novice band) and I s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00182.html (8,638 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Two contests within a contest? (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Sat Mar 7 06:22:59 1998; I always confirm the call I worked, if i need to correct it. That's the correct way... besides if I don't many will dupe me to make sure I have the call correct... So, lately I've been only answering; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00189.html (11,152 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Ethical question (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Fri Mar 13 08:21:20 1998; Well, this happens all the eime around here. I act as follows: I don't ack the "helper" and keep trying to work the weak station (unless he kept helping, when i said "thanks"). If I still don't hear; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00258.html (8,140 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] M/S READ THIS (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Mon Mar 16 10:09:27 1998; As I see it, those reports aren't the final result. the ubn is what the log checkers use to do they job better. Please anyone correct me if I'm wrong Ernesto LU5CW -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00284.html (6,703 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] penalty for 0 points bad calls (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Wed Mar 18 08:55:18 1998; Hello. What is the penalty for 0-point (own country) Bad calls? 3 x 0 points or 0 + 9 points?? Thanks Ernesto Grueneberg LU5CW (ex lu6beg & lu2brg) mailto:lu5cw@qsl.net -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00335.html (6,475 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] CQ-WPX..A Modest Proposal (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Fri Apr 3 23:02:06 1998; As some friend once said... "why do you want different rules or change your operating category in WPX? Even if you win you'll never receive a plaque/award" 73 Ernesto LU5CW mailto:lu5cw@qsl.net -- CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00061.html (9,021 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] WPX certificates and Plaques (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Sat Apr 18 14:39:52 1998; --Mensaje original-- De: Al Crespo <nh7a@radiomaui.com> Para: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com> Fecha: Viernes 17 de Abril de 1998 21:23 Asunto: [CQ-Contest] WPX certificates and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00320.html (7,197 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] team leader selection (WRTC2000) (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@qsl.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Wed May 13 12:37:17 1998; Hi WRTC2000 comittee Could you explain to me what is the criteria for selection of team leaders. I still don't understand it. Will you see how many times he won a contest. How many points he made. Av; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00120.html (7,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]