Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mail@jimforsyth.com: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll cont... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:19:59 -0800
Since I know the people involved and they pass through my area I have to say that I do not believe they refuse to work others and I do not believe they cause QRM any more than normally happens in a V
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00023.html (10,139 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll cont... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:30:48 -0800
We don't have any rovers on the west coast that do that. Yes it would be, can you name anybody who is saying that? 73 Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00027.html (7,546 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll, answer to Q's (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:26:15 -0800
Sounds like you are talking about when they went to Texas. Last time I checked Texas was not on the West coast. Are you saying they lied and there really were lots of stations they could have worked
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00029.html (7,897 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll cont... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 06:56:39 -0800
Your answer was non responsive. Here is my question again: Are you saying they lied and there really were lots of stations they could have worked but didn't? _________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00033.html (8,340 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll cont... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 07:03:59 -0800
Just to be sure I am understanding you correctly. We are talking about the N6NB rover team and you are asserting that there are a lot of stations that they deliberately do not work. Do I have your p
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00035.html (8,111 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll cont... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 08:23:24 -0800
Well you have no rational case to make so I will leave you with the following: I live in Southern California and when the N6NB rovers come through here I work them and I hear them working other stati
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00038.html (8,953 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll cont... (score: 1)
Author: mail@jimforsyth.com
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:53:28 -0700
There is a whole lot of time while travelling from one grid intersection to the next. Jim, AF6O Because working other stations takes time - time they need to move around the grid corner and work each
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00045.html (8,376 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Roving...whatever that is, really (score: 1)
Author: mail@jimforsyth.com
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:02:54 -0700
Ev, It's not possible to come up with workable definitions for captive roving or grid circling but that does not make it pointless to discuss it. Jim, AF6O Imaginations are powerful things. We can cr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00047.html (7,777 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Roving...whatever that is, really (score: 1)
Author: mail@jimforsyth.com
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:57:07 -0700
Well there is a common understanding, in principle, of both captive roving and grid circling and there has been a lot of discussion of both on here and some of it has been meaningful. The problem com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00049.html (8,699 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:15:49 -0800
Well I guess you could level a similar allegation against me. I made a deliberate decision to operate from my home QTH in California instead of moving somewhere back East where I could work a lot mor
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00061.html (8,562 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] [sidewindersontwo] Digest Number 1498 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:46:24 -0800
Is it April 1 already? Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00038.html (7,714 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Grid circling group & VUAC (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:31:34 -0700
Ah! a new reason to complain about them, good to see you are staying on top of things. What does "contiversy" mean? Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing lis
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00261.html (7,645 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:03:40 -0700
Well we cannot have all these undocumented rovers in the country without papers. It's clear we need comprehensive rover reform or would that be considered amnesty? Jim, AF6O _________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00264.html (7,180 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:36:18 -0700
Dave, you totally hit the nail on the head. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00382.html (8,557 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] KK6MCs figures (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:45:13 -0700
What a joke, you want everyone else to use real facts but you feel no need to do that yourself. The extract below contains a lie but you have no problem telling it. Jim, AF6O ________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00397.html (7,517 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:57:16 -0700
Well that guy should be in a special category because he is doing things that make it impossible for small stations to compete. (I am pretty sure I am following your logic correctly). _______________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00401.html (9,019 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:42:03 -0700
No, none of that is relevant. The guy in your example applied time, money and ability to win a contest, so did N6NB, an exact parallel. If N6NB did what he did but only ended up in tenth place this "
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00403.html (9,277 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Let's put it this way ... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:57:47 -0700
Going way beyond reality is a notable theme of this thread. I'm left thinking that the two main bashers must feel they could not make a case if they stuck with the facts. Jim, AF6O __________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00414.html (8,400 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:02:48 -0700
Well you did post something earlier today that is not true about "the undocumented rover" so if you have been getting emails calling you a liar, it is not without justification. The simple solution i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00416.html (9,422 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:10:37 -0700
Well heck John .. I never said I had other info regarding the operation, you are just jumping to conclusions. I just happen to know that one ham who is *not* a member of the N6NB group and does *not*
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00420.html (9,225 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu