Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark.k3msb@gmail.com: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M EWE Problems (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 18:39:19 -0500
Greetings fellow Top Band enthusiasts! I'm Mark K3MSB, and I live south of York PA. This is my first time posting to this list. Ive been licensed for 43 years and got on 160M in November 2014, so thi
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00111.html (9,608 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 160M EWE Problems (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:49:33 -0500
Good Evening Everyone Thank you for all the responses, some public, some private. Since some content overlapped, Ill post my answers to the group. I replaced the 2K pot with a 1.2K resistor. No chang
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00125.html (9,810 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 160M EWE Problems (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:54:56 -0500
By the way, there is a thread on 160M Noise Levels that is active. Is the noise that I'm seeing common to what others are seeing? If it is, that means it's not local to me (which doesn't mitigate the
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00126.html (7,064 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 160M EWE Problems (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:41:11 -0500
Bjorn, Tim: Thanks for your comments. I don't have much time to play with the antennas until the weekend, but I did manage to hook up an SWR Analyzer. The analyzer says 1.5:1 at 1820 Kc (35 ohms R).
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00139.html (13,616 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: ARRL 160CW Contest QRP Portable Op (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:05:48 -0500
Well, I think doing QRP is nuts on 160M, but I tired it during the RAC Winter Contest and made 26 QSOs in about 1.5 hours, and I have to admit it was kinda fun, and I was just pokin' along..... So, m
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00329.html (11,145 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Best DX QRP contact in the SP - N5IA (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:29:12 -0500
Same here! 73 Mark K3MSB _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00408.html (8,323 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: 160M EWE Problems (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:25:59 -0500
Good Evening I completely repositioned the EWE today, it's about 70 feet from it's original position and is not pointing at the INV-L. It's pointing towards southern EU. I Verified the feedline was O
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00466.html (12,880 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Huge NA-EU opening last night (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:21:00 -0500
Hello Tim I am a "Johnny Novice" on Top Band; my best was 25 EU DX contacts the night before last night. That was the first time I was able to call CQ and have EU stations answer me! Last night I wor
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00482.html (8,616 bytes)

9. Topband: 160M EWE Problems Part 2 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:32:03 -0500
Good Morning! Last night was the second night in a row with nice conditions between the east coast and Europe on 160M. I took the time to get a cup of coffee and spend a few hours comparing the Inver
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00483.html (9,446 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: K5P 160m run (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:33:31 -0500
I emailed the East Coast pilot station this morning inquiring about the 80M situation, and said I had heard that they may be having 80M TX problems. Don was kind enough to respond, and said "It seems
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00430.html (11,643 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: FT4JA easy copy tonite (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:00:19 -0400
Well, for some of us that don't have RX antennas (yet) he was definitely not super easy to copy, but there was at least a 30-45 minute interval when he was very workable using my Inv-L on TB and I wa
/archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00016.html (8,105 bytes)

12. Topband: FCC Public Notice DA 16-676 Noise Floor Technical Inquiry (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:11:19 -0400
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0615/ <http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0615/DA-16-676A1.pdf> DA-16-676A1.pdf <http://transition.fcc.gov/D
/archives//html/Topband/2016-06/msg00097.html (7,792 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: W3LPL station (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:47:56 -0400
I live about 50 miles northeast of Frank's QTH. My family was away for a few days and I was coming home just after lunch to take care of the critters, and I saw those thunder cells SW of me as I drov
/archives//html/Topband/2016-06/msg00114.html (7,611 bytes)

14. Topband: W0CM Coaxial Quarter Wave 160M RX Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:01:23 -0400
Hello All -- Do any of you have any experience with this antenna ? 73 Mark K3MSB _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00053.html (6,448 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: W0CM Coaxial Quarter Wave 160M RX Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:21:05 -0400
Hi Bob Thank you for your post. In addition to the link you provided, the only other info I have for this antenna is from http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/1996-10/msg00146.html and http://www.kcd
/archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00079.html (8,873 bytes)

16. Topband: 160M Inverted-L Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:33:54 -0400
I've been doing some reading on elevated radials for Inverted-L antennas. The existing literature seems to fall into two types; ground radials where the feed point is very close the ground, and syste
/archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00115.html (7,904 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: BOG - Selecting the Optimum Length (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:34:55 -0400
Based upon N9LBs comments, I just emailed Bruce and told him to hold my order for a KB-1. I have just enough room for 200 ft for a BOG. Extending it to 250, 290 feet etc is NOT an option for me. From
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00094.html (14,406 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: BOG - Selecting the Optimum Length (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:16:08 -0400
Gents Thanks for your very quick replies, a lot via private emails you guys are great and this 160M JN really appreciates it. I didnt realize the Lloyds BOG was a few inches above the ground, which m
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00100.html (17,544 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Where is everyone? (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:12:28 -0400
There's a lot of truth in what Jorge says. At 2 AM EDT (The timestamp of Don's post) I'm in the sack unless 160 has been open the evening before into EU, in which case I'll play radio until the SR li
/archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00135.html (11,838 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Contest conditions (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 09:26:24 -0500
I put in my BOG the Saturday before the contest. Its the basic 200 feet installation with a pair of 8 foot ground rods at each end. One of those rods was almost impossible to hammer in, but thats why
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00163.html (9,612 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu